from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2006, Issue No. 87
August 4, 2006
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
Support Secrecy News: http://www.fas.org/static/contrib_sec.jsp
SEN. BOND'S ANTI-LEAK BILL DRAWS FIRE AT HOME
"Sen. Kit Bond has gone way too far in an effort to curtail the public's right to information on government operations," according to one of the leading newspapers in his home state of Missouri.The Kansas City Star objected to a bill introduced this week by Senator Bond that would outlaw "leaks" or unauthorized disclosures of classified information. A similar provision was vetoed by President Clinton in 2000. Opponents of such measures argue that the ability of the press to uncover and report on misconduct in classified programs often depends on leaks of classified information, and that reporting on such leaks serves a larger national interest. So, for example, the fact that "numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted" on detainees at Abu Ghraib prison was classified "Secret" when it was first reported by the press. The unauthorized disclosure of these findings, from a classified report by Army General Antonio Taguba, triggered a series of investigations and continuing public controversy. "Bond should withdraw his proposal immediately," the Kansas City Star editorialized today. "It obviously is not well thought out." See "Law Would Go Against Ideals of Free Society," Kansas City Star, August 4 (free but intrusive registration required):
"Over the past few years, we have seen unauthorized disclosures of classified information at an alarming rate," said Senator Bond on the Senate floor on August 2."Each one of the leaks gravely increases the threat to our national security and makes it easier for our enemies to achieve their murderous and destructive plans. Each leak is a window of opportunity for terrorists to discover our sources and methods. Each violation of trust guarantees chaos and violence in the world." See the introduction of his bill to prohibit unauthorized disclosures as well as the text of the bill (S. 3774) here:
The bill has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
INFORMATION OPERATIONS IN IRAQ - WHAT WENT WRONG?
Information operations that are designed to influence the perceptions and conduct of enemy combatants and non-combatants can be a highly effective adjunct to military force, but they were not effectively executed by the U.S. military in Iraq, a new U.S. Army monograph reports.Information operations can include military deception, psychological operations, operations security, and electronic warfare. The Army monograph investigates the role of information operations in Iraq and presents recommendations for changes in doctrine, training, resources and intelligence support. See "Information Operations in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom -- What Went Wrong?" by Major Joseph L. Cox, US Army School of Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, May 2006 (134 pages, 3.6 MB PDF):
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, send an email message to firstname.lastname@example.org with "subscribe" (without quotes) in the body of the message.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a blank email message to email@example.com.
OR email your request to firstname.lastname@example.org
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT Secrecy News with a donation here: