from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2006, Issue No. 117
November 8, 2006
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
Support Secrecy News: http://www.fas.org/static/contrib_sec.jsp
- A GLIMPSE OF ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES
- FIRED AIR MARSHAL DEFENDS DISCLOSURE OF SENSITIVE SECURITY INFO
A GLIMPSE OF ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES
The role of special operations forces in the U.S. military is steadily increasing but relatively little is publicly known about the activities and performance of these specialized units.A new U.S. Army manual fills in some of the gaps in the public record with a description of the structure, capabilities and missions of U.S. Army Special Operations Forces (ARSOF). The manual has not been approved for public release, but a copy was obtained by Secrecy News. "ARSOF are specially organized, trained, and equipped military forces," it explains. "They conduct SO [special operations] to achieve military, political, economic, or informational objectives by generally unconventional means in hostile, denied, or politically sensitive areas." According to the Army, special operations forces can leap tall buildings in a single bound. "They provide to the Nation an array of deployable, agile, versatile, lethal, survivable, and sustainable formations, which are affordable and capable of rapidly reversing the conditions of human suffering and decisively resolving conflicts." Counterterrorism missions are a particular focus of special operations today. "ARSOF are, and will be for the near future, continuously engaged against terrorists whose goal is the destruction of American freedoms and the American way of life," the new manual says. Special operations also support intelligence collection. "ARSOF are a key enabler in the WOT [war on terror] by conducting SO, which obtain actionable intelligence.... The results of these activities may be fed directly to a commander or Country Team or may be input into the intelligence process for processing, analysis, and dissemination to military and other government agencies (OGAs)." There is also a domestic component to Army special operations, though it is not clearly specified in the manual. "The United States employs ARSOF capabilities at home and abroad in support of U.S. national security goals in a variety of operations." The manual spells out the principles of special operations warfare, including preemption, dislocation, disruption, and so forth. "SO [special operations] are frequently clandestine or low-visibility operations, or they may be combined with overt operations. SO can be covert but require a declaration of war or a specific finding approved by the President or the SecDef," the manual states. (The asserted ability of the Secretary of Defense to authorize covert operations has not been explicitly claimed before, to Secrecy News' knowledge.) "Significant legal and policy considerations apply to many SO activities," the manual observes. The new Army manual is unclassified, but its distribution is formally restricted "to protect technical or operational information." In view of the possible sensitivity of the document, Secrecy News is only posting the preface and the first of the eight chapters from the 119 page manual. See "Army Special Operations Forces," U.S. Army Field Manual FM 3-05, September 20, 2006:
The Congressional Research Service noted earlier this year that "The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) has called for a 15% increase in special operations forces beginning in FY 2007."
FIRED AIR MARSHAL DEFENDS DISCLOSURE OF SENSITIVE SECURITY INFO
A former Federal Air Marshal who was fired by the Transportation Security Administration last April for disclosing "sensitive security information" (SSI) to the press has filed suit against the government arguing that his disclosure was protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act.SSI is unclassified information regarding transportation security that is protected from disclosure by statute. "Your release of SSI to the media was unauthorized and not protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution," a TSA official wrote to Air Marshal Robert MacLean, notifying him of his termination. See:
But whistleblower advocacy groups, including the Government Accountability Project and the Project on Government Oversight, have rallied to the support of Mr. MacLean."The Federal Air Marshal Service is in blatant violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act, which protects the disclosure of unclassified information that an employee feels endangers public health and safety, and Robert certainly did that," said Adam Miles, legislative director of GAP, in a Washington Times story.
See "Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label" by Audrey Hudson, Washington Times, October 30:
See also "Air marshal's firing prompts whistleblower suit" by Stephen Losey, Federal Times, November 7:
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, send an email message to [email protected] with "subscribe" (without quotes) in the body of the message.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a blank email message to [email protected].
OR email your request to [email protected]
Secrecy News is archived at:
SUPPORT Secrecy News with a donation here: