from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
Volume 2013, Issue No. 14
February 5, 2013
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/
- KEEPING SECRETS FROM CONGRESS
- AN INTELLIGENCE HISTORY OF THE 1973 ARAB-ISRAELI WAR
- A REPORT ON CIA DETENTION AND RENDITION PROGRAMS
- THE JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE, AND MORE FROM CRS
KEEPING SECRETS FROM CONGRESS
When government information is classified or otherwise withheld from release, the possibility of government accountability to the public is undermined. But when the executive branch withholds crucial information from Congress, that may pose an even more fundamental challenge to democratic governance.
"The administration has refused to share Presidential Policy Directive 11 (PPD 11) with the Congress," said Sen. Richard Lugar last year at a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which has just been published. PPD 11 is the Obama Administration document that set the terms of reference for the Nuclear Posture Review Implementation Study, which will dictate the future size and configuration of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
Sen. Lugar voiced a polite objection to this unilateral act of Obama Administration secrecy: "I simply would say that our country is strongest and our diplomacy is most effective when nuclear policy is made by deliberate decisions in which both the legislative and executive branches fully participate."
The withholding of presidential directives from Congress is not a new practice. A 1992 investigation by the General Accounting Office found that Congress had not been routinely notified of the preparation or issuance of national security directives and that none of the relevant congressional committees "are regularly receiving copies" of such directives.
It is known that presidential directives can be used to establish national policy, to direct the implementation of policy, and to authorize the commitment of government resources. But without access to detailed information about the directives, GAO reported in 1992, "it is impossible to satisfactorily determine how many NSDs [national security directives] issued make and implement U.S. policy and what those policies are."
On the other hand, unlike many executive orders, presidential directives "do not appear to be issued under statutory authority conferred by Congress and thus do not have the force and effect of law," GAO said. Certainly such directives cannot limit congressional authority or power to legislate.
Yesterday eleven Senators wrote to President Obama to ask him to direct the release to Congress "the secret legal opinions outlining your authority to authorize the killing of Americans in the course of counterterrorism operations."
"It is vitally important... for Congress and the American public to have a full understanding of how the executive branch interprets the limits and boundaries of this authority, so that Congress and the public can decide whether this authority has been properly defined, and whether the President's power to deliberately kill American citizens is subject to appropriate limitations and safeguards," the Senators wrote.
Later in the day, Mike Isikoff of NBC News obtained a confidential Department of Justice White Paper entitled "Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who Is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa'ida or An Associated Force."
NBC said the document had been "provided to members of the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary committees in June by administration officials on the condition that it be kept confidential and not discussed publicly." This non-disclosure condition, now abrogated, is difficult to understand on national security grounds, but easier to comprehend as an attempt to manage or evade public controversy.
At any rate, the government's legal argument, such as it is, is now on the public record. The most important task before Congress is not to plead for release of additional, underlying source documents, but to respond as a legislative body to the Administration's now-public assertion of its position. To do nothing is to endorse it.
AN INTELLIGENCE HISTORY OF THE 1973 ARAB-ISRAELI WAR
The Central Intelligence Agency has published a series of essays on intelligence and the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, to coincide with a symposium on the subject held last week at the Nixon Presidential Library.
The publication itself ("President Nixon and the Role of Intelligence in the 1973 Arab-Israeli War") is a welcome addition to the literature. But it also "includes some embarrassing errors," wrote Amir Oren in the Israeli paper Ha'aretz on February 3 ("CIA report on Yom Kippur War: Israel had nuclear arsenal").
"For example," Oren wrote, "in the photograph labeled 'An Egyptian soldier holding up a portrait of President Sadat,' the soldier in question and the two soldiers flanking him are clearly Israelis, as evidenced by the 'IDF' stamped visibly on their shirts."
"The editors of the new study also err in attributing two things to lessons from the Six-Day War: the faulty prevailing conception among Israeli Military Intelligence 'that Israel would have at least 48 hours' warning before an invasion' and that Sadat wouldn't start a war before acquiring fighter planes. Furthermore, it seems they also confused war analyst Maj. Gen. (ret.) Chaim Herzog with one of his sons, Brig. Gen. (ret.) Mike Herzog," he added.
If these discrepancies are cause for embarrassment, then it is the kind of embarrassment that should be willingly endured. To put it another way, exposing such work to external review and criticism is an unsurpassed way of identifying and correcting errors.
A REPORT ON CIA DETENTION AND RENDITION PROGRAMS
In the absence of an official public account of post-9/11 U.S. counterterrorism programs, Americans (and others) must rely on unofficial accounts.
"Globalizing Torture" is a new report from the Open Society Justice Initiative, authored by Amrit Singh. It is said to provide "the most comprehensive account yet assembled of the human rights abuses associated with CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition operations. It details for the first time what was done to the 136 known victims, and lists the 54 foreign governments that participated in these operations. It shows that responsibility for the abuses lies not only with the United States but with dozens of foreign governments that were complicit."
It was reported in "Report Says 54 Countries Helped CIA After 9/11" by Scott Shane, New York Times, February 4.
THE JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE, AND MORE FROM CRS
New and updated reports from the Congressional Research Service that have not been made readily available to the public include the following.
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV): Background and Issues for Congress, February 4, 2013:
U.S.-India Security Relations: Strategic Issues, January 24, 2013:
Multilateral Development Banks: U.S. Contributions FY2000-FY2013, February 1, 2013:
IMF Reforms: Issues for Congress, February 1, 2013:
Medicare, Medicaid, and Other Health Provisions in the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, January 31, 2013:
Hemp as an Agricultural Commodity, December 18, 2012:
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.
The Secrecy News blog is at:
To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to:
OR email your request to [email protected]
Secrecy News is archived at:SUPPORT the FAS Project on Government Secrecy with a donation here: