FY98 Program Element Descriptive Summaries / RDDS

0303142A Satellite Communications (SATCOM) Ground Environment (SPACE)

COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
Total Program Element (PE) Cost 52821 39421 57827 44288 38779 37760 35886 36149 Continuing Continuing
D2PT SMART-T Operational Test 0 137 4715 26 0 0 0 0 0 4878
D2RT SCAMP Operational Test 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260
D253 Defense Satellite Communications Systems-Defense Communications Systems (DSCS-DCS)(Phase II) 17838 16510 14890 11610 8546 7439 11748 12120 Continuing Continuing
D384 SMART-T 20492 16413 17264 24641 13765 10087 7504 6520 214646 444164
D386 SCAMP Block I 9311 1007 2905 0 0 0 0 0 0 100576
D455 MILSTAR EDM Terminal 783 859 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299922
D456 Tactical Satellite Communications System 4137 4495 4235 4110 4684 4893 4889 4895 Continuing Continuing
D559 Automated Communications Management System (ACMS) 0 0 13818 3901 6778 9550 0 0 16328 34047
D561 Military Individual Communicator (MIC) 0 0 0 0 2006 2002 1004 1001 Continuing Continuing
D562 Multiband Integrated Satellite Terminal (MIST) 0 0 0 0 3000 3789 3782 4651 Continuing Continuing
D566 Transit MDR (TRAM) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6959 6962 Continuing Continuing

Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Military Satellite Communications (MILSATCOM) systems are joint program/project efforts with each Service, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), National Command Authority, Commanders-In-Chief (CINCs), National Security Agency and Office of the Secretary of Defense assigned specific responsibilities as specified in JCS Memorandum of Policy (MOP) 37. The worldwide MILSATCOM systems are the following: Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Fleet Satellite/Air Force Satellite (FLTSAT/AFSAT) system; the Super High Frequency (SHF) Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS); the Extremely High

Frequency (EHF) MILSTAR system; the UHF Follow-On Satellite system; and all MIL-STD-1582C compatible payloads. MOP 37 designates Army as the Executive Agent for MILSATCOM Ground Subsystems. As Executive Agent for MILSATCOM Ground Subsystems, Army is responsible for developing, procuring, and maintaining

the life cycle logistics support for satellite terminals; satellite control subsystems; communications subsystems; and all related equipment required to achieve end-to-end connectivity to satisfy JCS Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C3I) supporting the President; JCS; CINCs; Military Departments; Department of State; and other Departments and Agencies of the government. The projects in this Program Element support development acquisition programs or upgrades, still in engineering and manufacturing development (DoDD 5000.1), but which have received approval for production through DAB or other action, or production funds have been included in the DoD budget submission for the budget or subsequent fiscal year, and are, therefore, placed in Budget Activity 7.
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D2PT SMART-T Operational Test 0 137 4715 26 0 0 0 0 0 4878

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D2PT - SMART-T Operational Test. Project D2PT finances the direct costs of planning and conducting operational testing and evaluation of the Secure Mobile Anti-Jam Reliable Tactical Terminal (SMART-T) by the Operational Test and Evaluation Command (OPTEC). SMART-T is an Acquisition Category (ACAT) IC system with an Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOTE) in FY 98. Operational testing is conducted under conditions as close as possible to those encountered in actual combat with typical user troops trained to employ the system. OPTEC provides Army leadership with an independent test and evaluation of effectiveness and suitability of the system. Project D2PT is restructured from within PE 0303142A, Satellite Communications Ground Environment, and is not a new start. Starting in FY 96 and beyond, funding for operational testing of ACAT I systems is specifically programmed within the PE specific to each system.

Acquisition Strategy: Not Applicable

FY 1996 Accomplishments: Project not funded in FY 96

FY 1997 Planned Program:
134 Planning and preparation for IOT&E
3 Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)
Total 137

FY 1998 Planned Program:
4715 Conducts IOT&E
Total 4715

FY 1999 Planned Program:
26 Completes OPTEC independent evaluation of IOT&E required to support SMART-T Milestone III Decision Review
Total 26
B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 0 142 4708 106
Appropriated Value 0 137
Adjustments to Appropriated Value 0
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 0 137 4715 26

Change Summary Explanation: Funding: FY 99: (-80) Reduction due to streamlining

C. Other Program Funding Summary: Not Applicable
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Initiate IOT&E planning and preparation X
Conduct IOT&E X
Independent evaluation to support MS III

Decision Review

X
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Operational Test and Evaluation 134 4715 26
SBIR 3
Total 137 4715 26

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations: Not Applicable
Support and Management Organizations: Not Applicable
Test and Evaluation Organizations
OPTEC Jan 97 134 4715 26 0 4875
SBIR 3 3

Government Furnished Property: None
Subtotal Product Development
Subtotal Support and Management
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 137 4715 26 4878
Total Project 137 4715 26 4878
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D2RT SCAMP Operational Test 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D2RT - SCAMP Operational Test: Project D2RT finances the direct costs of planning and conducting testing and evaluation of the Single Channel Anti-Jam Manportable (SCAMP) terminal by the Operational Test and Evaluation Command (OPTEC). SCAMP Block I has been redesignated an Acquisition Category (ACAT) III system requiring Customer Test to evaluate early operational suitability of contractor prototype hardware prior to award of the FY 97 option. OPTEC provides Army leadership with an independent test and evaluation effectiveness and suitability of the system.

Acquisition Strategy: Not Applicable

FY 1996 Accomplishments:
260 Evaluated Pre-Award Equipment Demonstrations and Customer Test
Total 260

FY 1997 Planned Program: Project not funded in FY 97

FY 1998 Planned Program: Project not funded in FY 98

FY 1999 Planned Program: Project not funded in FY 99
B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 267 0 0 0
Appropriated Value 269 0 0 0
Adjustments to Appropriated Value -9 0 0 0
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 260

C. Other Program Funding Summary: Not Applicable
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Evaluate Pre-Award Equipment

Demonstrations

X*
Conduct Customer Test X*

*Denotes Milestone Completion
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Evaluate Pre-Award Equipment Demonstrations and Conduct

Customer Test

260 0 0 0
Total 260 0 0 0

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations: Not Applicable
Support and Management Organizations: Not Applicable
Test and Evaluation Organizations
OPTEC 1996 260 260

Government Furnished Property: None
Subtotal Product Development
Subtotal Support and Management
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 260 260
Total Project 260 260
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D253 Defense Satellite Communications Systems-Defense Communications Systems (DSCS-DCS)(Phase II) 17838 16510 14890 11610 8546 7439 11748 12120 Continuing Continuing


A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D253 - DSCS-DCS Phase II: This project provides funds required to develop strategic and tactical Ground Subsystem equipment to support JCS validated Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) for the worldwide Super High Frequency (SHF) Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS) program. Continuing upgrades for the DSCS are vital to support the emerging power projection and rapid deployment role of the Armed Forces. DSCS provides warfighters multiple channels of tactical connectivity as well as interface with strategic networks and national decision makers.

Acquisition Strategy: The Universal Modem System (UMS), Replacement Satellite Configuration Control Element (RSCCE), and Replacement BATSON (RBATSON), programs will be followed by Competitive Firm Fixed Price Procurement Programs that contain a basic production year followed by several option years of production. The DSCS Integrated Management System (DIMS) and Common Network Planning Software (CNPS) programs are software development programs that are not planned to have follow-on production.

FY 1996 Accomplishments:
7761 Completed Universal Modem (UM) development and continue Medium Data Rate (MDR) Technical Insertion UM Program
2050 Continued Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS) Integrated Management Systems (DIMS) Interface Software (Phase I)
4203 Continued Non-Developmental Item (NDI) Adaptation Phase of Replacement Satellite Configuration Control Element (RSCCE)
703 Developed the Specification and Acquisition Requirements Package for RBATSON
393 Completed DSCS Training Device development.
2328 Continued support and upgrades to the Integrated Research Facility (IRF) and Systems Engineering Technical Support (SETA) efforts
400 Task Force XXI
Total 17838

FY 1997 Planned Program:
2871 Complete MDR Technical Insertion UM Program
2513 Continue DIMS Interface Software (Phase II)
1769 Complete the NDI Adaptation Phase for the RSCCE
4587 Initiate development of the Replacement BATSON


FY 1997 Planned Program: (continued)
1945 Initiate development of the Integrated Baseband Workstation (IBWS)
415 Develop the specification and acquisition requirements package for the Common Network Planning Software (CNPS)
2020 Continue IRF and SETA efforts
390 Small Business Innovation Research / Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR)
Total 16510


FY 1998 Planned Program:
1200 Continue DIMS Interface Software (Phase III)
5215 Continue the RBATSON program
1900 Complete the IBWS program
3811 Initiate the Common Network Planning Software (CNPS) program
2764 Continue IRF and SETA efforts
Total 14890

FY 1999 Planned Program:
1000 Complete the RBATSON program
2000 Complete the DIMS Interface Software program
5940 Continue the CNPS program
2670 Continue IRF and SETA efforts
Total 11610
B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 18290 17063 15226 11946
Appropriated Value 18474 16510
Adjustments to Appropriated Value -636
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 17838 16510 14890 11610
C. Other Program Funding Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To

Compl

Total

Cost

OPA 2 - SSN: BB8500 74311 97406 87643 101727 70826 71375 59901 58396 Cont. Cont.
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
DSCS Trainer H/W & S/W Integration

Test

X*
UM Tech/International Test X*
RSCCE Testing including Init Oper Test X
Award R-BATSON Contract X*
DIMS Interface SW Testing (Phase I) X
IBWS System Specification Completion X
DIMS Interface SW Testing (Phase II) X
CNPS Contract Award X
RBATSON Testing X
DIMS Interface SW Testing (Phase III) X


* Denotes milestone completion
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Development (Prototype, Sys Engr, Test & Evaluation) 12223 10674 10500 7800
Integrated Research Facility 700 825 800 770
Contractor Engineering Support 1032 1050 621 570
Government Engineering Support 2255 1939 1505 1200
Program Management Support 1628 1632 1464 1270
SBIR/STTR 0 390 0 0
Total 17838 16510 14890 11610


B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information: Not Applicable
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D384 SMART-T 20492 16413 17264 24641 13765 10087 7504 6520 214646 444164

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D384 - SMART-T. The Secure Mobile Anti-Jam Reliable Tactical Terminal (SMART-T) will provide a range extension capability for the Army's Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE) to support the Force Projection Army. Specifically, it will provide a satellite interface to permit uninterrupted communications as our advancing forces move beyond the line-of-sight capability of MSE. This equipment will communicate at both low and medium data rates (LDR/MDR) over the MILSTAR satellite constellation. It will also be compatible with the UHF Follow-On (UFO); the Navy Fleetsatcom EHF satellite package; and MIL-STD-1582B/C compatible payloads. It will provide the security, mobility, and anti-jam capability required to defeat the threat and satisfy the critical need as stated above. The SMART-T will also have Low Probability of Interception and Low Probability of Detection (LPI/LPD) to avoid being targeted for destruction, jamming or intercept. The prime mover will be a High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) configured with all the electronics and the self-erectable antenna.

Acquisition Strategy: The SMART-T program employed a competitive development strategy. The development phase included two contractors performing under Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF) contracts. The contracts were awarded on 9 Nov 92 to Raytheon Company (Marlborough, MA) and Rockwell International (Richardson, TX). Twelve Engineering Development Model (EDM) terminals (6 from each contractor) were developed under the two contracts. The streamlining features of this phase included a reliability growth plan to achieve the required reliability by Follow-On Test and Evaluation (FOT&E). Both Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and Full Rate Production (FRP) were competitively awarded to Raytheon Company on 7 Feb 96 under a single contract based upon the development contract effort and LRIP/FSP proposals. The Project Management Office elected to defer discrete development initiatives until after down select for greater cost efficiency. A SMART-T Milestone III Decision will be conducted prior to exercising the first FRP Option in FY 99. The total Army terminal requirement is 209, of which 43 will be procured during LRIP (base year plus one option) to ensure sufficient quantities are available for the launch of the first MDR satellite in FY 99. The full scale production (FSP) quantities (157 Army terminals) will be awarded as fixed price options to the LRIP/FSP contract following Milestone III approval. Additional quantities (i.e., 178) will be procured for the Air Force, Marine Corps, JCSE, Navy, and other DoD Special Users.

FY 1996 Accomplishments:
13574 Completed Contractor Technical Test and obtain Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Decision
6198 Began development effort for Joint Interoperability Standard, Automated Communications Management System, Network Control, and Demand Assigned Multiple Access
720 Began development of interactive training courseware
Total 20492




FY 1997 Planned Program:
10684 Continue development of Network Control, Demand Assigned Multiple Access, Payload Specification Changes and C4I Technical Architecture
3385 Continue development of interactive training courseware
1949 Conduct Terminal Test with Lincoln Labs MDR Simulator
395 Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR)
Total 16413


FY 1998 Planned Program:
11764 Continue development of Network Control, Demand Assigned Multiple Access, Payload Specification and C4I Technical Architecture
3900 Complete development of interactive training courseware
1600 Initiate Polar modification development work
Total 17264


FY 1999 Planned Program:
17841 Continue development of Network Control, C4I Technical Architecture and Demand Assigned Multiple Access
4500 Continue Payload Specification Change development work resulting from test with on-orbit MDR Payload satellite
2300 Complete Polar modification development work
Total 24641
B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 21226 17217 23764 95
Appropriated Value 21440 16413
Adjustments to Appropriated Value -948
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 20492 16413 17264 24641

Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY 98: (-6500) reprogrammed to establish for Automated Communications Management Systems (ACMS) program line (D559)

FY 99: (+24546) reprogrammed from OPA to fund DAMA, Polar modification, Payload Specification changes and C4I Technical Architecture
C. Other Program Funding Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To

Compl

Total

Cost

Other Procurement Army 2 - SSN: BC 4002 51429 34670 22762 61019 65957 44791 16268 11160 Cont Cont
Other Procurement Army 4 - SSN: BS 9720 0 0 1042 1454 0 2919 2656 2053 Cont Cont
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Complete Contract Technical Test X*
Obtain LRIP Decision X*
Award FFP LRIP/FRP Contract X*
Receive 12 EDM Terminals X*
Begin Joint Interoperability Standards

Development effort

X*
Conduct SIM 2 Test X
Complete Interactive Training

Courseware

X
Complete DAMA Development X
Begin Polar Mod X

*Denotes Milestone Completion
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Contractor 13286 9508 12157 18557
Government Systems Engineering & Project Mgmt 7206 6510 5107 6084
SBIR/STTR 395
Total 20492 16413 17264 24641

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations
Dual Development

Contracts

C-CPIF 09 Nov 92 11713 11713 108786 8387 0 0 0 0 117173
Other Contracts MIPR/PWD Various 63797 63797 349 4899 9620 12157 18557 14891 60473
Govt Support N/A Various 23625 23625 5482 3260 2526 2137 2084 8685 24174
Support and Management Organizations
Other Contracts MIPR/PWD Various 15475 15475 10260 630 361 685 700 8685 21321
Core Support N/A Various 6227 6227 3094 678 317 300 300 17370 22059
Lab Activities MIPR/PWD Various 10057 10057 2428 838 652 1300 1800 43425 50443
Lincoln Labs MIPR Various 3049 3049 20160 1800 2542 685 1200 121590 147977
SBIR/STTR N/A N/A 395 395

Government Furnished Property
Item

Description

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Delivery

Date

Total Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Property
CDH Chips/Chip

Carriers

MIPR Jul 93 149 149
Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Subtotal Product Development 114766 16546 12146 14294 20641 23576 201969
Subtotal Support and Management 35942 3946 4267 2970 4000 191070 242195
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Total Project 150708 20492 16413 17264 24641 214646 444164
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D386 SCAMP Block I 9311 1007 2905 0 0 0 0 0 0 100576

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D386 - SCAMP. The SCAMP BLK I Terminal will provide four simultaneous channel full duplex data, half duplex voice communications at 2400 bits per second (bps) each in a 37 pound manportable configuration. These satellite terminals are to be employed by units that require range extension for command and control communications. Block I will provide priority tactical ground users with the capability to transmit and receive intelligence, command, and control traffic from a base station. It will transmit in the Extremely High Frequency (EHF) band and receive in the Super High Frequency (SHF) band. It will provide Low Data Rate (LDR) secure voice at 2400 bps and secure data at 75-2400 bps, as well as interface with Common Hardware/Software devices such as the Lightweight Computer Units and the Hand-Held Terminal Unit. The SCAMP BLK I will be fully interoperable within the Army C4I Technical Architecture. The terminal will have embedded COMSEC and TRANSEC with set-up and tear-down in less than 10 minutes. In addition to operation on MILSTAR satellites, the SCAMP BLK I will operate on all satellites which utilize the MIL-STD-1582C/D LDR waveform. It will be required to operate in environmental conditions that include smoke, aerosol, rain, fog, snow, haze and dust, and must operate in the transmit, receive or stand-by mode throughout an entire mission (typically 30 days). SCAMP BLK I is the first EHF manportable terminal and provides direct support to the tactical warfighter mobile forces with greater anti-jam protection, lower probability of intercept, and lower probability of detection.

Acquisition Strategy: The Block I development phase initially included two competing contractors performing under Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF) which were competitively awarded in Sep 92. Based upon unexpected cost growth of both contractors and the lack of government affordability to retain two, an early determination was made to Terminate for Convenience the Lockheed Corporation contract on 16 Sep 93. A Market Survey was conducted in Jun 94 in which 5 vendors participated. On 26 Oct 94, the AAE restructured the SCAMP Block I program and the Martin Marietta Corporation contract was Terminated for Convenience. A Milestone III Decision for a competitive full scale production buy (quantity of 312 multi-service terminals) was approved on 15 Nov 94. An Advanced Planning Briefing to industry was held at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, on 29 Nov 94. On 7 Apr 95, the SCAMP Block I was redesignated an ACAT III program. Team Fort Monmouth awarded the SCAMP Block I Firm Fixed Price Production Contract to Rockwell International, Richardson, Texas, on 23 Feb 96. Engineering Feasibility Efforts (EFE) to develop the objective terminal in the range of 12-15 pounds was approved in the Acquisition Decision Memorandum to begin in FY 96 through FY 99. These efforts provide confidence in technical approach and lead to Milestone II/III Engineering/Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase for the objective system. The SCAMP Block II effort previously funded in this PE is restructured to PE 0603856A, Project D389 beginning in FY 97.

FY 1996 Accomplishments:
3825 Completed Pre/Post Award Evaluation/Demonstrations/Reviews/Customer Test/MILSTAR Spec change
5486 Began Engineering Feasibility Efforts (EFE) (i.e., lightweight composite structures, paging prototype system, enhanced vocoder, etc.)
Total 9311

FY 1997 Planned Program:
748 Conduct System level tests
237 Initiate/complete UHF Follow-On (UFO), Fleetsat EHF Package (FEP) Control Planning Tools
22 Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfers (SBIR/STTR)
Total 1007


FY 1998 Planned Program:
2905 Initiate/Complete Polar Modification development
Total 2905


FY 1999 Planned Program: Programs not funded

B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 9549 1029 6056 0
Appropriated Value 9645 1007
Adjustments to Appropriated Value -334
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 9311 1007 2905 0


Change Summary Explanation: FY98: (-3151) Zero reprogrammed to support Automated Communications Management System (ACMS) D559.

C. Other Program Funding Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To

Compl

Total

Cost

Other Procurement Army 2 - SSN: BC 4003 20057 14425 4305 4813 1763 1655 494 241 Cont Cont
Other Procurement Army 3 - SSN: BS 9718 2571 2853 Cont Cont
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Begin Engineering Feasibility Efforts

(EFE)

X*
Complete Pre-Award Equipment

Demonstrations

X*
Conduct Pre-Award Review X*
Award FFP FRP Contract X*
Conduct Customer Test X*
Award Rebuy X*
Conduct Follow-On Test and Evaluation

(FOT&E)

X
Begin Fielding and Support X
Conduct System Level Tests X
Initiate/Complete UHF Follow-On (UFO)/

Fleetsat EHF Package (FEP)

Planning Tools

X
Initiate/Complete Polar Modifications X

*Denotes Milestone Completion
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Contractor 4067 609 2806 0
Government Systems Engineering and Project Management 5244 376 99 0
SBIR/STTR 22
Total 9311 1007 2905

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations**
Martin Marietta CPIF Sep 92 38998 38998 38998 0 0 0 0 0 38998
Lockheed CPIF Sep 92 9650 9650 9650 0 0 0 0 0 9650
Other Contracts PWD Various N/A 19232 11750 4067 609 2806 0 0 19232
Govt Support MIPR/PWD Various N/A 7902 6628 1199 0 75 0 0 7902
Support and Management Organizations:
Other Contracts MIPR/PWD Various N/A 8177 6673 1128 376 0 0 0 8177
Core Support N/A Various N/A 3830 2916 890 0 24 0 0 3830
Lincoln Labs MIPR Various N/A 12352 10385 1967 0 0 0 0 12352
Lab Activities MIPR/PWD Various N/A 353 353 0 0 0 0 0 353
SBIR/STTR 22 22
Test and Evaluation Organizations:
EMP Test (Kirkland AFB) MIPR Sep 96 0 60 0 0 0 60

** Lockheed Terminated for Convenience 9/93

** Martin Marietta Terminated for Convenience 10/94

Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Subtotal Product Development 67026 5266 609 2881 75782
Subtotal Support and Management 20327 4045 398 24 24794
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Total Project 87353 9311 1007 2905 100576
COST (In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
D455 MILSTAR EDM Terminal 783 859 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 299922

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Project D455 - MILSTAR EDM Terminal (MET). These EHF MILSTAR Engineering Development Model (EDM) terminals will be utilized as test assets to support satellite payload tests. They will also reduce risk in the Secure Mobile Anti-Jam Reliable Tactical Terminal /(SMART-T) and Single Channel Anti-Jam Manportable (SCAMP) terminal development process. The terminals are capable of providing mobile, survivable, anti-jam, low probability-of-intercept communications from an S-250 shelter mounted on a Common Utility Cargo Vehicle (CUCV) truck towing a trailer with generator.

Acquisition Strategy: A single Full Scale Engineering Development (FSED) contract was awarded in Mar 85 to develop and produce 15 FSED terminals. Magnavox Electronic Systems Company received the award. A sole source production contract was to be executed in Nov 92; however, due to the changed world situation, no production buy was required. The MET will be used for SCAMP and SMART-T contractor risk reduction tests and satellite payload tests.

FY 1996 Accomplishments:
783 Continued Government and Contractor support of testing with SCAMP and SMART-T to reduce risk
Total 783

FY 1997 Planned Program:
859 Continue Government and Contractor support of testing with SCAMP and SMART-T to reduce risk
Total 859

FY 1998 Planned Program: Program Not Funded

FY 1999 Planned Program: Program Not Funded
B. Project Change Summary FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
FY 1997 President's Budget 789 878 0 0
Appropriated Value 793 859
Adjustments to Appropriated Value -10
FY 1998 Pres Bud Request 783 859

C. Other Program Funding Summary: Not Applicable
D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
SMART-T Low Data Rate (LDR)

Verification

X* X
Evaluation Demo with SCAMP X*
Follow-On Test and Evaluation (FOT&E)

with SCAMP

X

*Denotes milestone completion
A. Project Cost Breakdown FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Government Systems Engineering and Project Management 783 859
Total 783 859

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations
Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligation Date Performing Activity EAC Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Budget to Complete Total Program
Product Development Organizations
Magnavox (D501) FFP Dec 85 112544 112544 112544 112544
Magnavox (E716) CPIF Sep 90 11363 11363 11363