0305906F NCMC-TW/AA Systems

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This program element funds the replacement systems for the Cheyenne Mountain Complex (CMC) which provides the Command, Control, Communications and Computers (C4) in support of the Integrated Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment (Integrated TW/AA) system. This program incrementally upgrades and replaces the current operational systems without loss of attack warning capability during the phased transition. The CMC supports the Commander-in-Chief (CINC) North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)/CINC US Space Command in providing the National Command Authorities, USSTRATCOM and other forward users with early warning (missile, air, and space) and assessment of attack on North America or its allies.

This program element has three related projects: The first project, Cheyenne Mountain Upgrade (CMU), is six acquisitions that are supported by both the second and third project. The second project, Integrated TW/AA System Engineering, provides interface analysis and disconnect resolution between CMU and over twenty other Integrated TW/AA systems and program upgrades and supports the development of the Cheyenne Mountain Training System (CMTS). The third project, Legacy Interfaces, provides software development upgrades to post-IOC CMU subsystems and direct mission software support to meet operational needs.

This program element is in Budget Activity 7 Operational System Development because it involves post-Milestone III efforts, and the projects in this program element support development acquisition programs or upgrades.

(U) Acquisition Strategy:

The CMU program was restructured in FY94 to implement an acquisition strategy that tests and delivers four phases of user capability. Phase 1 implemented the complete missile warning capability in Sep 95. Phase 2 operational acceptance occurred in Aug 96. Phases 3/4 will test and implement CMU capabilities in annual blocks (with O&M version releases) and incorporate upgrades and changes to meet evolving user requirements.

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Previous President's Budget	63,554	31,692	7,623	5,291
(U) Appropriated Value		31,692
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions		-1446
b. SBIR		-780
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	-6,842
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB			-261	-255
(U) Current Budget Submit/98 BES	56,712	29,466	7,362	5,036

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96 reductions funded higher priority Air Force and DoD requirements. FY97 reductions are Congressional actions (Sec 8136, 8138 and 8037) and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR).

Schedule: Phase 1 (complete missile warning) was implemented in Sep 1995, two months ahead of schedule. Acquisition approach tests and implements Phase 2 (survivable communications) with operational acceptance which occurred in Aug 1996. Phases 3 and 4 (development of subsystem capability and software upgrades) are tied to annual O&M version releases.

Technical: No change.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) Other Procurement *	9,043	5,321	8,969	12,520	4,773	13,304	12,343	11,333	Cont	Cont
(U) Operations & Maintenance	91,422	85,769	99,330	94,929	87,230	96,019	92,803	98,564	Cont	Cont

* Includes spares for CMU and CINC Mobile Alternate Headquarters (CMAH) and modifications.

Related RDT&E:

(U) #604441F, Space-Based Infrared System

(U) #305910F, Spacetrack

(U) #305911F, Defense Support Program

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) CMU Phase 1 Operational Acceptance
(U) Missile Warning IOT&E				x
(U) CMU Phase 2 Operational Acceptance				x
(U) Air Warning Mission Operational Acceptance							x
(U) CMU Phase 3 Operational Acceptance								x
(U) Space Control Mission Operational Acceptance											x
(U) CMU Phase 4 Operational Acceptance											x
(U) CMU Integrated Mission IOT&E														x

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
3880	CMU	37,893	16,010	603	120	0	0	0	0	0	1,297,524

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The CMU program must meet Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) requirements to provide the National Command Authorities with timely, reliable, and unambiguous Integrated TW/AA data for force survival or retaliatory decisions in the face of air, space, or ballistic missile threats. The program will provide: 1) survivable communications access for missile attack warning; 2) integrated warning of ballistic missile, atmospheric, and space threats; 3) standard user displays and warning processing systems at selected command centers; 4) an austere alternate facility capable of early/trans-attack warning and peacetime backup to the Missile Warning Center at Cheyenne Mountain. The CMU program implements an acquisition strategy that tests and delivers four phases of user capability. Phase 1 implemented the missile warning capability in Sept 1995. Phases 2/3/4 will test and implement CMU capabilities in annual blocks completing all planned capabilities by Aug 1998, with CMU Integrated Mission IOT&E completed by Mar 1999.

(U) FY 1996

(U) $10,175	Completed CMU Phase 2 (Aug 96); continued Survivable Secure Communications Network Phase 2; delivered SCIS (I4)/Processing and Display System (May 96)
(U) $2,406	Completed ATAMS Phase 1 (May 96)
(U)	Continue CMU Phase 3 to include:
(U) $2,724	Missile Warning remote from APCC
(U) $11,924	Granite Sentry (Air Warning) at Cheyenne Mountain
(U)	Initiate Phase 4 to include:
(U) $10,664	SPADOC 4C version 2 interface development and testing with CSSR
- (U) $37,893	Total

(U) FY 1997

(U) $7,733	Complete Phase 3 (Aug 97) with operational acceptance of Granite Sentry and Missile Warning remote capability
(U) $7,441	Continue Phase 4, SPADOC 4C version 2 interface development with CSSR
(U) $836	Complete Missile Warning IOT&E residuals and deliver SSCN Phase 2 (Feb 97)
(U) $16,010	Total

(U) FY 1998

(U) $603	Complete CMU Phase 4 and Space Control Mission Operational Acceptance
(U) $603	Total

(U) FY 1999

(U) $120	Complete CMU Integrated Mission IOT&E
(U) $120	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Previous President's Budget	46,947	21,375	608	122
(U) Appropriated Value		21,375
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions		-588
b. SBIR		-780
c. Project Realignment	-2,212	-3,997
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	-6,842
e. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB			-5	-2
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	37,893	16,010	603	120

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY96 reductions funded higher priority Air Force and DoD requirements. Project Realignment reflects a transfer of $2,212 from project 3880 to 3881 in FY96 and $3,997 from project 3880 to 3881. FY97 reductions are Congressional actions (Sec 8136, 8138 and 8037) and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR).

Schedule: Phase 1 completed (missile warning) Sep 1995. Acquisition approach tests and implements Phases 2, 3 and 4 (development of subsystem capability and software upgrades) are tied to annual O&M version releases.

Technical: Includes Missile Warning remote from APCC and development of ATAMS.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999	FY 2000	FY 2001	FY 2002	FY 2003	To Compl	Total Cost
(U) Other Procurement *	9,043	5,321	8,969	12,520	4,773	13,304	12,343	11,333	Cont	Cont
(U) Operations & Maintenance	91,422	85,769	99,330	94,929	87,230	96,019	92,803	98,564	Cont	Cont

* Includes spares for CMU and CINC Mobile Alternate Headquarters (CMAH).

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY1996

FY1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) CMU Phase 1 Operational Acceptance
(U) Missile Warning IOT&E				x
(U) CMU Phase 2 Operational Acceptance				x
(U) Air Warning Mission Operational Acceptance							x
(U) CMU Phase 3 Operational Acceptance								x
(U) Space Control Mission Operational Acceptance											x
(U) CMU Phase 4 Operational Acceptance											x
(U) CMU Integrated Mission IOT&E														x

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Major Contract Incremental Funding	9,296	1,780
(U) Award/Performance Fee	2,363	13
(U) Target To Ceiling/Overrun		645
(U) ECPs/Correction of Deficiencies/Incomp	2,233	1,389
(U) Interoperability/Test Support	2,171	1,060	603	120
(U) Pre-Operational Support/SWSC Maintenance	314
(U) Type I Training/TDY	72
(U) SSCN/SCIS Fallback/Secure Voice Tell Network	442
(U) Tech Manuals	11	4
(U) Missile Warning Remote Display	1,302
(U) SPO Support
(U) MITRE	9,556	5,048
(U) TEMS/SDAS/WSI/SAIC/NSR	6,325	3,791
(U) Program Support	3,333	2,280
(U) Other Support	475	0
(U) Adjustment for BPAC misalignment
(U) Total	37,893	16,010	603	120

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Lockheed-Martin CO Springs CO	C/CPIF/AF	Oct 91	72,300	72,300	267,606	4,063	1,873			0	273,542
E-Systems St Petersburg FL	C/FPI/AF	Aug 86	107,000	106,500	100,576	2,664	0			0	103,240
TRW, Inc Carson CA	C/FPI/AF	Jun 87	172,600	172,600	211,540	2,221	0			0	213,761
GTE Needham Hgts MA	C/CPIF/AF	Jan 92	16,500	16,500	236,662	1,401	300			0	238,363
Lockheed-Martin CO Springs CA	SS/CPIF/AF	Mar 93	41,300	41,300	113,602	6,111	2,733			0	122,446
DISA (Govt) Reston VA	PO	Oct 93	9,092	9,092	8,650	442	0			0	9,092
KAMAN Sciences CO Springs, CO	AF616/C	Aug 95	3,176	3,176	1,874	1,302	0	0	0	0	3,176

Support and Management Organizations

MITRE	SS/PR	Oct 95	N/A	N/A	153,941	9,556	5,048			0	168,545
TEMS	C/PR	Oct 95	N/A	N/A	62,311	6,325	3,791			0	72,427
Program Support	Various	Nov 95	N/A	N/A	86,136	3,808	2,265	603	120	0	92,932

Test and Evaluation Organizations

N/A

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable.

Subtotal Product Development	940,510	18,204	4,906			0	963,620
Subtotal Support and Management	302,388	19,689	11,104	603	120	0	333,904
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Adjustment for BPAC misalignment
Total Project (See R-2 for actuals)	1,242,898	37,893	16,010	603	120	0	1,297,524

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
3881	Integrated TW/AA	11,074	8,800	5,132	3,871	4,256	3,939	3,967	3,936	Continuing	Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This project was set up in 1989 when Air Force recognized the phased transition of CMU program into the Integrated TW/AA network could only be achieved through rigorous system-of-systems design and engineering analysis of all interfaces and relationships among the twenty-six systems of the network. This project provides for the efficient integration of CMU through interface analysis, schedule management and disconnect resolution between CMU and over twenty other Integrated TW/AA systems and program upgrades as required to support the Integrated TW/AA network's continually evolving system-of-systems (e.g., Space-Based Infrared System) and changes driven by new missions/threats.

(U) FY 1996

(U) $5,441	SEIT: Provide operation integration of CMU Phase 2 installation, check-out, test and assessment; maintain program schedule; identify, track and resolve CMU disconnects
(U) $2,172	TPE: Maintain CMU technical baseline; evaluate CMU performance and track to prescribed requirements; provide system engineering for CMU Phase 2, and accomplish systems engineering studies for proposed ITW/AA system improvements.
(U) $2,133	CMTS: Continue to support CMTS program
(U) $1,328	Interface Control System Development
(U) $11,074	Total

(U) FY 1997

(U) $6,632	SEIT: Provide operation integration of CMU Phase 3 installation, check-out, test and assessment; maintain program schedule; identify, track and resolve CMU disconnects
(U) $2,168	TPE: Maintain CMU technical baseline; evaluate performance and track to prescribed requirements; provide system engineering for Phase 3, and accomplish systems engineering studies for proposed ITW/AA system improvements.
(U) $8,800	Total

(U) FY 1998

(U) $1,577	SEIT: Provide operation integration of CMU Phase 4 installation, check-out, test and assessment; maintain program schedule; identify, track and resolve disconnects within the ITW/AA system.
(U) $3,555	DSM: Manages planned incremental capability modifications to NCMC-TW/AA systems.
(U) $5,132	Total

(U) FY 1999

(U) $239	SEIT: Integrated Mission IOT&E for CMU Phase 3
(U) $3,632	DSM: Manages planned incremental capability modifications to NCMC-TW/AA systems.
(U) $3,871	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Previous President's Budget	8,861	5,562	5,375	4,115
(U) Appropriated Value		5,562
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions		-759
b. Project realignment	2,213	3,997
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB			-243	-244
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	11,074	8,800	5,132	3,871

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: Funding: FY96 reductions funded higher priority Air Force and DoD requirements. Project realignment reflects a transfer of $2,212 from project 3880 (CMU) and $1 from project 4409 (Legacy Interface) to 3881 (ITW/AA) in FY96 and $3,997 from project 3880 to 3881 in FY97. FY97 reductions are Congressional actions (Sec 8136, 8138 and 8037).

Schedule: No change.

Technical: No change.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

(U) Not Applicable.

(U) D. Schedule Profile

(U) Not Applicable. This is a sustaining engineering effort that supports project 3880 with no distinct milestones.

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Major Contract Incremental Funding	0	0
(U) Award/Performance Fee	248	0
(U) CMTS Systems Integration	1,885	0
(U) Interface Control System Development	1,328
(U) SPO Support
(U) MITRE	4,672	4,852	3,012	2,006
(U) TEMS/WSI	2,704	3,846	1,152	958
(U) Program Support	237	102	968	907
(U) Total	11,074	8,800	5,132	3,871

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Support and Management Organizations

MITRE	CPFF	Oct 95	N/A	N/A	39,313	4,672	4,852	3,012	2,006	Cont	Cont
TEMS	CPAF	Oct 95	N/A	N/A	24,715	2,704	3,846	1,152	958	Cont	Cont
Program Support	N/A	Nov 95	N/A	N/A	6,725	237	102	968	907	Cont	Cont

Prime Contractors

(Various)

812

0

0

TBD

TBD

Product Development Organizations

DISA	MIPR	Apr 96	1,328	1,328		1,328				0	1,328
LORAL Aerospace Co Springs, CO	C/CPIF/AF	Jun 95	6,390	6,390	4,257	2,133				0	6,390

Test and Evaluation Organizations

N/A

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)

Government Furnished Property:

Not Applicable.

Subtotal Product Development	4,257	3,461					7,718
Subtotal Support and Management	71,565	7,613	8,800	5,132	3,871	Cont	Cont
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Total Project	75,822	11,074	8,800	5,132	3,871	Cont	Cont

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1996 Actual	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	FY 2002 Estimate	FY 2003 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4409	Legacy Interfaces	7,745	4,656	1,627	1,045	0	0	0	0	0	47,516

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

The FY95 Appropriations Conference Committee transferred $41.5M from the O&M Critical Space Contract Operations Line to the RDT&E R-1 line in this program element. Congress realigned these funds from O&M to RDT&E to identify the costs associated with CMU software development upgrades to the CMU program. To clearly account for this funding, this project, Legacy Interfaces, was established. This project provides funding for software development upgrades to the CMU program and for direct mission software support to meet operational needs.

(U) FY 1996

(U) $1,581	Provide SPADOC software support/upgrades
(U) $3,176	Provide Cheyenne Mountain software support/upgrades
(U) $2,988	Provide Warning Systems software support/upgrades
(U) $7,745	Total

(U) FY 1997

(U) $500	Provide SPADOC software support/upgrades
(U) $1,344	Provide warning system software upgrades for space, communications, and missile warning systems at Cheyenne Mountain
(U) $2,812	Provide Cheyenne Mountain complex test support to include scenario development and development network software engineering
(U) $ 4,656	Total

(U) FY 1998

(U) $1,627	Provide SPADOC software support/upgrades
(U) $1,627	Total

(U) FY 1999

(U) $1,045	Provide SPADOC software support/upgrades
(U) $1,045	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Previous President's Budget	7,746	4,755	1,640	1,054
(U) Appropriated Value		4,755
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Reductions		-99
b. SBIR
c. Project Realignment	-1
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming
(U) Adjustment to budget years since FY97 PB			-13	-9
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	7,745	4,656	1,627	1,045

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: Project realignment reflects a transfer of $1 to Project 3881 in FY96. FY97 reductions are Congressional actions (Sec 8136 and 8138).

Schedule: No change.

Technical: No change.

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

(U) Not Applicable.

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

(U) SPADOC software support/upgrades

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

(U) CMAS software support

x

x

x

x

(U) Warning systems software support/upgrades

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

(U) CMC Test Support

x

x

x

x

(U) CMAS software upgrades

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1996	FY 1997	FY 1998	FY 1999
(U) Major Contract Incremental Funding	7,096	4,181
(U) Award/Performance Fee	649	475
(U) Total Legacy Interfaces Project	7,745	4,656	1,627	1,045

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1996

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget FY 1998

Budget FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Lockheed-Martin CO Springs CO	CP/AF	Oct 94	12,024	12,024	7,271	1,581	500	1,627	1,045		12,024
E-Systems St Petersburg FL	FPIF/AF	Oct 94	1,880	1,880	1,880						1,880
Kaman Sciences CO Springs CO	CP/AF	Oct 94	18,166	18,166	12,453	2,851	2,812				18,116
Kaman Sciences CO Springs CO	CP/AF	Oct 94	12,520	12,520	8,139	2,988	1,344				12,471
Navy/NISE	MIPR	Sep 95	3,025	3,025	2,700	325					3,025

Support and Management Organizations: N/A Test and Evaluation Organizations: N/A Government Furnished Property: N/A

Subtotal Product Development	32,443	7,745	4,656	1,627	1,045	0	47,516
Subtotal Support and Management
Subtotal Test and Evaluation
Total Project	32,443	7,745	4,656	1,627	1,045	0	47,516