| COST ($ In Thousands) | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | |
| Total Program Element (PE) Cost | 54,334 | 31,851 | 28,573 | 14,147 | 24,509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | TBD | Continuing | |
| 2295 | Space Surveil Net Improvement Pgm (SSNIP)* | 7,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing |
| 4239 | Air Force Maui Optical Station | 6,132 | 6,297 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing |
| 4241 | Advanced Electro Optical System (AEOS) | 16,886 | 20,281 | 23,800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | TBD | TBD |
| 4279 | Have Stare Radar | 23,389 | 5,273 | 4,773 | 14,147 | 24,509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | TBD | TBD |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
* Note: These sustainment efforts were not terminated but will continue in the Operations & Maintenance (O&M Appropriation) from FY97 and on.
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
The SPACETRACK program element represents a worldwide Space Surveillance Network (SSN) of dedicated, collateral, and contributing electro-optical, passive radio frequency (RF) and radar sensors. The SSN is tasked to provide space object cataloging and identification, satellite attack warning, timely notification to U.S. forces of satellite fly-over, space treaty monitoring, and scientific and technical intelligence gathering. The continued increase in satellite and orbital debris populations, as well as the increasing diversity in launch trajectories, non-standard orbits, and geosynchronous altitudes, necessitates continued modernization of the SSN to meet existing and future requirements and ensure their cost-effective supportability. SPACETRACK also developed the systems interfaces necessary for the command and control, targeting, and damage assessment of a potential future U.S. Anti-satellite (ASAT) system. The Image Information Processing Center and Supercomputing facility for the Air Force Maui Optical Station (AMOS), were transferred to PE 0602601F in FY92. The resources and responsibility for completing the HAVE STARE Radar System development were transferred to SPACETRACK from an intelligence program per Congressional direction in FY93. All of these projects are Budget Activity 7 Operational Systems Development because they involve development of or modifications to operational sensor network sites.
(U) Acquisition Strategy:
Except for the Congressionally-directed Maui Space Surveillance Site facilities expansion project, Advanced Electro Optical System (AEOS), and the HAVE STARE
radar acquisition, the other projects in this Program Element are competetive sustaining engineering infrastructure support operations and maintenance efforts.
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
||
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 54,705 | 18,867 | 0 | 0 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 33,867 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | -1190 | ||||
| b. SBIR | -826 | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | -371 | ||||
| e. Recission | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB | 28,573 | 14,147 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 54,334 | 31,851 | 28,573 | 14,147 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY 96 reductions funded other Air Force program priorities. The Air Force budgeted continuation of the AEOS project in FY 97 and FY 98. All funds budgeted in FY 99 are to continue the HAVE STARE project.
Schedule: HAVE STARE site selection was not finalized until early FY 1996; the IOC is planned for FY00.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | To Compl | Total Cost | |
| (U) Other Procurement | ||||||||||
| Space Mods with Initial Spares | 18,385 | 10,200 | 7,362 | 1,472 | 1,275 | 4,005 | 4,006 | 4,005 | Cont | Cont |
Related RDT&E: (U) Program Element #0305906F, NORAD Cheyenne Mountain Complex Tactical Warning/Attack Assessment System of Systems.
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) GEODSS Telescopes O&M Mods | ||||||||||||||||
| (U) Implementation & sustainment | x | |||||||||||||||
| (U) AEOS telescope/facility | ||||||||||||||||
| (U) Factory acceptance/occupancy | x | |||||||||||||||
|
(U) HAVE STARE radar |
||||||||||||||||
| (U) Overseas site selection decision | x | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Deinstall Test Site | x | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Reinstall at Operational Site | x |
* Note: These sustainment efforts were not terminated but will continue in the Operations & Maintenance (O&M Appropriation) from FY97 and on.
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
Space surveillance includes space object cataloging and identification and supports the Space Defense missions of weapons support, attack warning for U.S. satellites,
maintenance of space order of battle, cover-up alerts, and identification/assessment of space objects. The Space Surveillance Network Improvement Program (SSNIP)
provides the sustaining engineering to correct identified deficiencies in support of those mission requirements. SSNIP also implements modifications required to
reduce supportability/maintainability O&M costs. SSNIP efforts currently include reducing uncorrelated target errors, orbital debris measurement and research,
communications/data link optimization, system architecture analyses and changes to the Ground-based Electro-Optical Deep Space Surveillance System (GEODSS).
This activity will continue as part of normalized sustaining engineering support services in the O&M appropriation account from FY97 and on. This project is in
Budget Activity 7 Operational Systems Development because it involves a level-of-effort for sustained engineering support for development of, or modifications to, an
operational SPACETRACK network site.
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $4,718 | Continue level-of-effort support to GEODSS and Eglin O&M cost reduction modifications. |
| (U) $2,109 | Continue systems engineering level-of-effort to define, analyze and model operating and maintenance sustainment efforts for FY97 and on. |
| (U) $1,100 | Continue astrodynamic standards, star catalog maintenance and deep space anomaly detection efforts to improve the accuracy of orbital element data, to improve consistency between sensors and to correct basic inadequacies of existing models for non-standard orbits. |
| (U) $7,927 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable. |
(U) FY 1998
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable |
(U) FY 1999
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 | FY 1999 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 7,909 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing |
| (U) Appropriated Value | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | |||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | 18 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB | |||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 7,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY 96 increased due to returned funds from overpayment of miscellaneous Air Force bills.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Other Procurement | ||||||||||
| (U) Space Mods with Initial Spares | 18,317 | 10,200 | 7,383 | 1,477 | 1,281 | 4,031 | 4,034 | 4,040 | Cont | Cont |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) GEODSS cost savings mods | ||||||||||||||||
| (U) Implementation and sustainment | x |
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) Sustaining Engineering Level-of-Effort | 7,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (U) Total | 7,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Not Applicable.
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
AMOS serves as a testbed for electro-optics and imaging technology supporting government and academic communities. It also provides operational data to Air Force
Space Command: infrared signature data and compensated, imaging data used for space object identification and mission/payload assessment. Other government labs,
national science foundations and other scientific agencies use of this facility are funded separately. This project is in Budget Activity 7 Operational Systems
Development because it involves a level-of-effort for sustained engineering support for development of, or modifications to, an operational SPACETRACK network
site.
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $3,132 | Continue basic AMOS facility operations, maintenance and support of upgrade integration efforts. |
| (U) $2,000 | Continue development of an observatory control system in support of AEOS, Maui supercomputer and Hi-Class Lidar projects. |
| (U) $1,000 | Continue development of sensors for daylight imaging and geosynchronous space object identification. |
| (U) $6,132 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $6,297 | Continue support to Maui Space Surveillance Site (MSSS) R&D upgrades, development of MSSS observatory control system, and operational transition of AEOS. |
(U) FY 1998
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable |
(U) FY 1999
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 | FY 1999 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 6,132 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Cont |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 6,500 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | -203 | ||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB | |||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 6,132 | 6,297 | 0 | 0 | Cont |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: Congress added $6,500 in FY 97.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
Not Applicable.
(U) D. Schedule Profile
Not Applicable.
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) Operations and maintenance support level of effort | 6,132 | 6,297 | 0 | 0 |
| (U) Total | 6,132 | 6,297 | 0 | 0 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Not Applicable.
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
The Advanced Electro-Optical System (AEOS) is a 3.67 meter telescope addition to the Air Force Maui Optical Station (AMOS). The AEOS program was initiated in
FY91 per Congressional direction. Congress continued to appropriate funding for this project in FY93, FY94, FY95, FY96, and FY 97. The Air Force budgeted for
the continuation of AEOS in FY 97 and FY 98. This project is in Budget Activity 7 Operational Systems Development because it involves sustained engineering
support for development of, or modifications to, an operational SPACETRACK network site.
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $9,386 | Continue telescope development incremental funding. |
| (U) $6,500 | Continue sensor instrumentation acquisitions. |
| (U) $1,000 | Continue lab support. |
| (U) $16,886 | Total |
(U) FY 1997:
| (U) $13,427 | Continue telescope development incremental funding. |
| (U) $6,854 | Continue atmospheric characterization studies, spectrograph research, development of adaptive optics system, and sensors development. |
| (U) $20,281 | Total |
(U) FY 1998
| (U) $23,800 | Continue development of adaptive optics, sensors, and integration of the telescope system, purchase pre-operational spares, continue development of AEOS and MSSS observatory control system, and R&D upgrades to MSSS. |
| (U) $23,800 | Total |
(U) FY 1999
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 16,886 | 13,427 | 0 | 0 | TBD |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 21,927 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | -820 | ||||
| b. SBIR | -826 | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97 PB | 23,800 | ||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 16,886 | 20,281 | 23,800 | 0 | TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: Congress added $8,500 in FY 97. The Air Force budgeted for project continuation in FY98.
Schedule: Facility delays due to weather impacts/dome installation.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
| ||||||||
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 | |
| Other Procurement | 18,385 | 10,200 | 7,362 | 1,472 | 1,275 | 4,005 | 4,006 | 4,005 |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) Factory acceptance/occupancy facility | x | |||||||||||||||
| (U) Telescope Factory Acceptance | x | |||||||||||||||
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | |
| (U) Directed level of effort for AEOS Maui facilities expansion | 16,886 | 20,281 | 23,800 | 0 |
| (U) Total | 16,886 | 20,281 | 23,800 | 0 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Not Applicable.
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
The HAVE STARE (HS) radar was transferred from the intelligence budget in FY93 at the direction of Congress. The Air Force has identified a requirement for the
HS system and has programmed funding in this program element to complete development and to deploy the system. HS is a high resolution X-band tracking and
imaging radar with a 27 meter mechanical dish antenna. HS will be deployed as a dedicated space surveillance sensor to support the mission of space object catalog
maintenance of deep space objects and mission payload assessment. HS will retain its original design features and their inherent potential to support other missions.
This system is currently in the EMD phase leading to an IOC in FY00.
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $4,000 | Continue in-CONUS developmental and integration testing and evaluation at Vandenberg AFB, CA. |
| (U) $6,000 | Continue incorporation of functionality and connectivity modifications required for integration with the Space Surveillance Network. |
| (U) $10,155 | Begin site preparation at classified operational deployment location. |
| (U) $20,155 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $4,000 | Continue in-CONUS developmental and integration testing and evaluation at Vandenberg AFB, CA. |
| (U) $1,273 | Continue site preparation at classified operational deployment location. |
| (U) $5,273 | Total |
(U) FY 1998
| (U) $2,400 | Continue radar development incremental funding. |
| (U) $2,373 | Continue preparations for deployment |
| (U) $4,773 | Total |
(U) FY 1999
| (U) $1,000 | Continue radar development incremental funding. |
| (U) $2,000 | Continue facility preparations |
| (U) $10,147 | Deploy and re-install program equipment |
| (U) $1,000 | Logistics and training |
| (U) $14,147 | Total |
(U) FY 2000
| (U) $8,000 | Complete facility preparations. |
| (U) $7,000 | Continue installation and checkout |
| (U) $3,000 | Logistics and Training |
| (U) $6,509 | Conduct system formal testing and turnover |
| (U) $24,509 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 | FY 1999 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 23,778 | 5,440 | 0 | 0 | TBD |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 5,440 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | |||||
| b. SBIR | -167 | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | -389 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY97PB | 4,773 | 14,147 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 23,389 | 5,273 | 4,773 | 14,147 | TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY 96 reduction for other Air Force program priorities. The Air Force budgeted to continue this project in FY 98 and FY 99.
Schedule: Project delayed due to delay in overseas site selection and previously withheld funding.
Technical: Development delayed due to withheld funding based on delayed siting decision.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) None. |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY 1999
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
(U) HAVE STARE Radar Siting Decision
x
(U) HAVE STARE Deinstall Test Site
x
(U) HAVE STARE Reinstall at
Operational Site
x
FY 1996
FY 1997
FY 1998
FY 1999
(U) Prime Contract
12,789
3,455
2,773
10,000
(U) Site Preparation
8,500
2,000
(U) SPO Support
2,100
1,818
2,000
2,147
(U) Total
23,389
5,273
4,773
14,147