| COST ($ In Thousands) | FY 1996 Actual | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | FY 2002 Estimate | FY 2003 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | |
| Total Program Element (PE) Cost | 38,446 | 32,340 | 47,336 | 43,809 | 50,255 | 59,829 | 53,018 | 49,839 | Continuing | TBD | |
| 4597 | (U) Air Force Test Investments | 0 | 0 | 47,336 | 43,809 | 50,255 | 59,829 | 53,018 | 49,839 | Continuing | TBD |
| 3120 | Air Force Development Test Center | 10,546 | 9,206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing | TBD |
| 3285 | Arnold Engineering Development Center | 5,368 | 5,625 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing | TBD |
| 3620 | Air Force Flight Test Center | 19,622 | 17,509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Continuing | TBD |
| 2904 | Holloman Hypersonic Sled Trak | 2,910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
This program element provides planning, improvements, and modernization for test capabilities at three Air Force Test Centers: Arnold Engineering Development Center
(AEDC), Air Force Development Test Center (AFDTC), and Air Force Flight Test Center (AFFTC). The purpose is to help test centers keep pace with emerging weapon
system technologies. Test investment activities are also funded at the Space and Missile Systems Center Test Directorate (SMC/TE) and the Joint Program Office (JPO) for
T&E. The fluctuations in the funding at these locations are due to changing priorities in the improvement and modernization requirements as defined through the AF Test
Investment Planning & Programming. Also, all projects have been reviewed through the Tri-Service Reliance effort (to communicate AF efforts to the other services and
avoid unwarranted duplication of effort) and are documented in the Test Capability Master Plans. Further, each project has its own planning, development, equipment
acquisition/facility construction, equipment installation, and checkout phases which often requires significant differences in funding from one year to the next. As such, the
changes in funding from year to year do not necessarily indicate program growth but rather a planned phasing of improvement and modernization efforts. The test
capabilities at these centers enable testing through all phases of weapon system acquisition from system concept exploration through component and full scale integrated
weapon system testing to operational testing. These three test centers have over $10B worth of unique test facilities/capabilities. They are a national asset operated and
maintained by the Air Force for DoD test and evaluation missions, but they are available to others having a requirement for their unique capabilities. Beginning in FY98,
T&E investments are consolidated in this project to properly reflect that Air Force investments are determined at the component and DoD level. Prior to FY98 investments
were reflected by test center and led to misperceptions that investment planning was geographically determined.
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 38,446 | 33,529 | 39,472 | 39,580 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 33,529 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | -735 | ||||
| b. SBIR | -454 | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | 7,864 | 4,229 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998 PB | 38,446 | 32,340 | 47,336 | 43,809 | Cont |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY98/99 increases reflect an Air Force initiative to upgrade the severely deteriorated AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel complex. This initiative is a multi-year effort.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| Appropriation: Military Construction,
Budget Activity: Defense-Wide Mission Support, Program Title: Fighter Inlet Flow |
8,690 |
8,690 |
Related RDT&E:
(U) PE 0604940D, Central Test & Evaluation Improvement Program
(U) PE 0604256F, Threat Simulator Development
(U) PE 0604735F, Combat Training Ranges
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The AFDTC, located at Eglin AFB, FL, conducts and supports developmental test and evaluation and operational test and evaluation of non-nuclear air armaments, C4I systems, and target acquisition and weapon delivery systems; provides a climatic simulation capability; and determines target/test item electronic signatures. The Guided Weapon Evaluation Facility (GWEF) provides a full spectrum, multifunctional seeker/sensor laboratory test capability for all guided weapons. Common Airborne Instrumentation System (CAIS) Integration provides standardized airborne test to enhance interoperability and commonality. GPS Range Systems will provide a major improvement for Time-Space-Position-Information (TSPI) at all MRTFBs and specifically at the Eglin Ranges for munitions testing. Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) Test Capabilities Upgrade will provide connectivity to existing capabilities and add needed networks and hardware to develop a C4I test bed. The Preflight Integration of Munitions and Electronic Systems (PRIMES) facility conducts preflight test and evaluation of total integrated weapon systems in a secure anechoic chamber. The Armament Systems Test Environment (ASTE) Range Systems effort upgrades instrumentation of the major data collection systems supporting open air testing. The Climatic Test Facility modernization of instrumentation and environmental capabilities supports the military construction upgrade, extending its useful life to 2015. Mission Control/Data Analysis provides for real-time central mission control and analysis. Multispectral Missile Engagement Hardware-in-the-Loop (HITL) Test provides a capability to support multiple and wide field-of-view missile engagements incorporating multispectral stimulations. These projects ensure test center technology is compatible with weapon systems to be tested such as AMRAAM, JDAM, AGM-130, ASRAAM, JTIDS, JSTARS, Combat Talon, etc.
Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC), Arnold AFB, TN, provides ground environmental test support for DoD aeronautical, missile, and space
programs. The center has 53 test facilities providing: aerodynamic testing of scale model aircraft, missile, and space systems; testing of large and full-scale satellites,
sensors, and space vehicles in a simulated space environment; altitude environmental testing for aircraft, missile, and spacecraft propulsion systems; and testing of large-scale models such as space boosters together with their propulsion systems. The AEDC Data Acquisition and Processing System (DAPS) provides processing capability for
advanced turbine engine testing on programs like the F-22. This effort also upgrades data systems for the arc heaters and hypervelocity gun facility for Theater High
Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) testing. Inefficiencies in these current data systems result in increased program costs and schedule delays. The Computer Aided
Modernization Project (CMP) will provide increased capability for data processing and storage and provide wider availability of workstations. The Propulsion Wind
Tunnel (PWT) Sustainment project sustains long-term operation of tunnels 16T and 16S to meet transonic/supersonic test needs. The Improve Turbine Engine Structural
Integrity project will provide new state-of-the-art structural test monitoring and data analysis systems to support turbine engine structural tests to detect and analyze high
cycle fatigue.
The AFFTC, located at Edwards AFB, conducts and supports developmental test and evaluation and operational test and evaluation of aircraft and aircraft systems, aerospace research vehicles, unmanned miniature vehicles, cruise missiles, parachutes delivery/recovery systems, and cargo-handling systems. The AF Common Airborne Instrumentation System (CAIS) Integration & Support (CAIS I&S) supports DoD objectives for interoperability/commonality. The goal of CAIS I&S is to integrate CAIS equipment and supporting instrumentation equipment and systems to provide a full airborne instrumentation operational capability. The Advanced Data Acquisition and Processing Systems (ADAPS) project provides an integrated capability to satisfy real-time first generation post-test data processing, archival, and display requirements of the next decade. The developmental approach is directed towards providing a high degree of interoperability between systems and components by adherence to Air Force and DoD guidelines. The technologies being developed under ADAPS have the potential to satisfy data processing and display needs at various multi-service test ranges. The Space Based Data Relay (SBDR) project provides the capability for ARIA to fulfill customer needs for real time, high-speed data, and greatly improve the overall range data relay capability. The Flight Simulator Modernization project will upgrade the Test and Evaluation Modeling and Simulation (TEMS) facility to meet future man-in-the loop simulator requirements.
The Space and Missile Systems Center's Test Directorate (SMC/TE) is located at Kirtland AFB, NM and is responsible for test planning and implementation for all space and ballistic missile systems. The Combined Space Test Task Force project will provide the capability to develop and test new satellites and ground control systems.
Beginning in FY98, T&E investments are consolidated in this project to properly reflect that Air Force investments are determined at the component and DoD level.
Prior to FY98 investments were reflected by test center and led to misperceptions that investment planning was geographically determined.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $ | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $ | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
| Air Force Development Test Center | |
| (U) $5,324 | Continue CAIS integration, procure CAIS production units, and continue procurement of support equipment. |
| (U) $2,650 | C4I Test Capabilities Upgrade. Complete the acquisition of workstations, continue procurement of network connections and hardware/software, and begin acquisition of interconnectivity software. |
| (U) $3,707 | GWEF will complete the expanded radar simulator and begin development of a multispectral man-in-the-loop capacity. |
| (U) $1,123 | Continue GPS integration on the range and Central Control Facility. Begin acquisition of a translator/processor system. |
| (U) $1,850 | PRIMES will acquire a Communication-Navigation-Identification (CNI) simulator. Begin development of a reactive munitions loop and phased angle of arrival capability. |
| (U) $1,375 | ASTE Range Systems. Begin upgrades to TSPI systems, timing, telemetry, microwave, communications, arenas, gun test, photo-optics, and fiber optics. |
| Arnold Engineering Development Center | |
| (U) $3,140 | Continue AEDC DAPS with acquisition and installation of additional workstation/processors in engine test cells and Aerodynamic and Propulsion Test Unit (APTU). IOC of T/J cells portion of DAPS. |
| (U) $2,030 | Continue purchase of CMP workstations (fourth increment). |
| (U) $8,270 | Begin PWT Sustainment projects. Begin design and procurement of PWT data acquisition and processing systems. Start requirements planning for flow quality and electric motor repower improvements. |
| Air Force Flight Test Center | |
| (U) $6,535 | CAIS I&S development. Purchase CAIS components for AFFTC use. Continue TIMS development with automated setup of systems, automated diagnostics, and simulation capability.. Continue development of a CAIS optical bus interface unit. Begin development of an on-board processing capability. |
| (U) $4,824 | ARIA Space Based Data Relay. Complete the communications portion of the SBDR program. Continue software integration of the SBDR subsystems upgrades. |
| (U) $6,173 | Continue integration of ADAPS with ground test simulation capabilities. Begin developing capabilities to support multiple flight test missions including Tri-Service Operational flight tests. Develop capability to increase test data flow throughput and decrease flight test mission turnaround time. Begin integration of test planning requirements with the ADAPS system setup capability. |
| Other Projects | |
| (U) $335 | Continue Joint Program Office T&E support activities. |
| (U) $47,336 | Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
| Air Force Development Test Center | |
| (U) $2,970 | Continue CAIS integration, procure CAIS production units, and continue procurement of support equipment |
| (U) $1,939 | C4I Test Capabilities Upgrade. Complete the network connections and continue the acquisition of interconnectivity software and equipment for a classified C4I test capability. |
| (U) $3,184 | GWEF will continue the multispectral man-in-the-loop effort and begin development of an active laser simulator. |
| (U) $2,402 | Continue GPS integration and complete the acquisition of translator/processor system. |
| (U) $1,990 | PRIMES will continue development of the reactive munitions loop, complete the phased angle of arrival, and begin acquisition of chamber free space instrumentation. |
| (U) $2,189 | ASTE Range Systems will continue upgrades to TSPI systems, timing, telemetry microwave, communications, arenas, gun test, and photo-optics. |
| (U) $1,174 | Mission Control/Data Analysis will begin procurement of data acquisition equipment and real-time TM equipment. |
| (U) $2,400 | The Multispectral Missile Engagement HITL Test Capacity will begin acquisition of a target generator and development of target and clutter models. |
| (U) $797 | Begin Climatic Test Facility upgrade. |
| Arnold Engineering Development Center | |
| (U) $1,106 | AEDC DAPS. Complete installation of J5/J6 rocket test cell DAPS. FOC of C/T/J cells portion of DAPS. |
| (U) $2,040 | Continue purchase of CMP workstations (fifth increment). |
| (U) $4,599 | PWT Sustainment. Continue installation of data acquisition and processing system in 16T and 16S. Continue installation of 16T/16S pre-test checkout system. Begin design of plant control systems. Continue planning for flow quality and electric motor repower improvements |
| (U) $2,016 | Improve Turbine Engine Structural Integrity. Integrate requirements for all enabling hardware/software technologies. Continue design of aeromechanical test hardware and data analysis techniques. |
| Air Force Flight Test Center | |
| (U) $4,480 | CAIS I&S development. Continue TIMS development with automated setup of systems, automated diagnostics, and simulation capability. Continue development of a CAIS optical bus interface unit. Continue development of an on-board processing capability. Begin development of an advanced solid state recorder. |
| (U) $1,493 | ARIA Space Based Data Relay. Continue software integration of the SBDR subsystems upgrades. |
| (U) $5,638 | ADAPS. Continue to integrate simulation system with real-time data analysis capability. Continue to provide the traditional post-test analysis capability in near real-time in the Ridley Mission Control Rooms. Rehost the ground based data processing capabilities airborne data processing system. Provide avionics data processing in near real-time in the Ridley Mission Control Rooms. |
| (U) $1,000 | Flight Simulation Modernization. Begin the upgrade of the TEMS facility to meet future man-in-the-loop simulator requirements for programs such as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Procure hardware to support the development of a reconfigurable Air Warfare Mission Simulator (AWMS) cockpit simulator. |
| (U) $238 | Begin ARIA record and timing system upgrade. |
| (U) $796 | Begin linked interactive T&E networking. |
| Other Projects | |
| (U) $358 | Continue Joint Project Office T&E support activities. |
| (U) $1,000 | Combined Space Test Task Force. Begin development of an accurate US space resource database along with space resource models. Begin procurement of necessary hardware and software to support database models. |
| (U) $43,809 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 39,472 | 39,580 | |||
| (U) Appropriated Value | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | |||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | 7,864 | 4,229 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998 PB | 47,336 | 43,809 | Cont |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY98/99 increases reflect an Air Force initiative to upgrade the severely deteriorated AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel complex. This initiative is a multi-year effort.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The AFDTC, located at Eglin AFB, FL, conducts and supports developmental test and evaluation and
operational test and evaluation of non-nuclear air armaments, C4I systems, and target acquisition and weapon delivery systems; provides a climatic simulation capability;
and determines target/test item electronic signatures. The Guided Weapon Evaluation Facility (GWEF) provides a full spectrum, multifunctional seeker/sensor laboratory
test capability for all guided weapons. Common Airborne Instrumentation System (CAIS) Integration provides standardized airborne test to enhance interoperability and
commonality. GPS Range Systems will provide a major improvement for Time-Space-Position-Information (TSPI) at all MRTFBs and specifically at the Eglin Ranges for
munitions testing. Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) Test Capabilities Upgrade will provide connectivity to existing capabilities and
add needed networks and hardware to develop a C4I test bed. These projects ensure test center technology is compatible with weapon systems to be tested such as
AMRAAM, JDAM, AGM-130, ASRAAM, JTIDS, JSTARS, Combat Talon, etc.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $5,441 | CAIS integration procured interim CAIS production units to provide commonality and interoperability to aircraft instrumentation. Continued pod development and procurement of video cameras, recorders and time code generators. |
| (U) $3,258 | GWEF developed software and hardware to provide multimode targets for hardware-in-the-loop (HITL) testing, continued investments in an expanded radar simulator with acquisition of software and hardware to provide expanded RF/MMW simulation capabilities in the GWEF. Completed the IR target generator project, adding target/background scenes required to conduct HITL testing of long-wave guided weapons. |
| (U) $1,847 | GPS Range integration continued data link acquisition and integration of RAJPO equipment to fully implement GPS architecture on Eglin Test Ranges. |
| (U) $10,546 | Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $2,367 | Continue CAIS integration, procure CAIS production units, and continue procurement of support equipment for bench, laboratory, and preflight. |
| (U) $1,747 | C4I Test Capabilities Upgrade. Begin procurement of workstations, network connections, and hardware/software for a classified C4I test capability. |
| (U) $3,081 | GWEF will complete the multimode project and continue the expanded radar simulator. |
| (U) $2,011 | Continue procurement of GPS instrumentation for surface and airborne TSPI. |
| (U) $9,206 | Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 10,546 | 9,405 | |||
| (U) Appropriated Value | 9,405 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | -199 | ||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | |||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998 PB | 10,546 | 9,206 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: None.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC), Arnold AFB, TN, provides ground
environmental test support for DoD aeronautical, missile, and space programs. The center has 53 test facilities providing: aerodynamic testing of scale model aircraft,
missile, and space systems; testing of large and full-scale satellites, sensors, and space vehicles in a simulated space environment; altitude environmental testing for aircraft,
missile, and spacecraft propulsion systems; and testing of large-scale models such as space boosters together with their propulsion systems. The AEDC Data Acquisition
and Processing System (DAPS) provides processing capability for advanced turbine engine testing on programs like the F-22. This effort also upgrades data systems for the
arc heaters and hypervelocity gun facility for Theater High Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) testing. Inefficiencies in these current data systems result in increased program
costs and schedule delays. The Computer Aided Modernization Project (CMP) will provide increased capability for data processing and storage and provide wider
availability of workstations. The Fighter Engine Test Capability will upgrade turbine engine test cells to accommodate higher thrust engines, and upgrade J-2 test cell with
Exhaust Gas Management System for axisymmetric vectored exhaust nozzles.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $3,693 | Began installation of the Aeropropulsion System Test Facility (ASTF) portion of the Data Acquisition and Processing System (DAPS). Completed design and procure system equipment for the engine test cells and complete upgrades to all data analysis areas. Completed data recording upgrade for Trenton cells. |
| (U) $1,675 | Completed IOC of Phase I of CMP (replacement of current system) and purchase Phase II workstations. (second increment) Completed Reengineering of Processes by which CAM/CAD/CAE functions are accomplished internally and also with external customers. |
| (U) $5,368 | Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $3,714 | Continue AEDC DAPS with acquisition and installation of additional work stations/processors in the engine test cells. IOC ASTF and J4 rocket test cell portions of DAPS. |
| (U) $1,336 | Continue purchase of Phase II CMP workstations (third increment). Continue training of personnel. |
| (U) $575 | Complete fighter engine test capability upgrade. |
| (U) $5,625 | Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 5,368 | 5,745 | |||
| (U) Appropriated Value | 5,745 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | -120 | ||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | |||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998PB | 5,368 | 5,625 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: None.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) | ||||||||||
| Appropriation: Military Construction,
Budget Activity: Defense-Wide Mission Support, Program Title: Fighter Inlet Flow |
8,690 |
8,690 |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The AFFTC, located at Edwards AFB, conducts and supports developmental test and evaluation and
operational test and evaluation of aircraft and aircraft systems, aerospace research vehicles, unmanned miniature vehicles, cruise missiles, parachutes delivery/recovery
systems, and cargo-handling systems. The AF Common Airborne Instrumentation System (CAIS) Integration & Support (CAIS I&S) supports DoD objectives for
interoperability/commonality. The goal of CAIS I&S is to integrate CAIS equipment and supporting instrumentation equipment and systems to provide a full airborne
instrumentation operational capability. The Advanced Data Acquisition and Processing Systems (ADAPS) project provides an integrated capability to satisfy real-time first
generation post-test data processing, archival, and display requirements of the next decade. The developmental approach is directed towards providing a high degree of
interoperability between systems and components by adherence to Air Force and DoD guidelines. The technologies being developed under ADAPS have the potential to
satisfy data processing and display needs at various multi-service test ranges. The AF GPS RAJPO Equipment project provides funding for the purchase of production GPS
equipment developed by the RAJPO (OSD funded) for tri-service application. The Space Based Data Relay (SBDR) project provides the capability for ARIA to fulfill
customer needs for real time, high-speed data, and greatly improve the overall range data relay capability. The ARIA Extended S-Band Telemetry upgrade ensures the
compatibility of the ARIA with the Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELV) and major DoD ranges.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $6,342 | Continued CAIS I&S development. Completed CAIS diagnostic bench integration. Purchased CAIS low rate data recorder initial spares. Completed TIMS integration with CAIS (assumes availability of CAIS units). |
| (U) $5,363 | Completed IOC of first ADAPS Real-Time/Post-Flight Processing (RT/PFP) system. Procured the first mass storage archive system to replace nine track tapes currently being used. |
| (U) $3,408 | Continued purchase of RAJPO GPS equipment. Conducted acceptance testing of GPS equipment purchased in FY 95. |
| (U) $2,812 | Continued ARIA Space Based Data Relay System program. Completed non-recurring engineering work on system design and T-2 aircraft modification. Commenced equipment installation and aircraft modification. |
| (U) $1,697 | Continued the ARIA Extended S-Band program equipment installation and aircraft #1-4 modification. |
| (U) $19,622 | Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $6,248 | Continue ARIA Space Based Data Relay program. Continue equipment installation/fabrication and #2 aircraft modification. |
| (U) $3,998 | Continue CAIS I&S development. Purchase CAIS components for AFFTC use. Continue TIMS development with automated setup of systems, automated diagnostics, and simulation capability. Begin development of a CAIS optical bus interface unit. |
| (U) $880 | Complete purchase of RAJPO GPS equipment. |
| (U) $5,733 | FOC of ADAPS RT/PFP. Procure second mass storage archive system. Begin integration of ADAPS with ground test simulation capabilities. |
| (U) $650 | Complete the ARIA Extended S-Band equipment installation and modification project. |
| (U) $17,509 | Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 19,622 | 18,379 | 17,850 | 14,237 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 18,379 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | -416 | ||||
| b. SBIR | -454 | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | -152 | -137 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998 PB | 19,622 | 17,509 | 17,698 | 14,100 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: None.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
| Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Provides technological upgrades to the Holloman Hypersonic Sled Track through the Magnetic Levitation
(Maglev) development program.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $2,910 | Completed development and prototyping of a sled and rail girder system. |
| (U) $2,910 | Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) | Not applicable. |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 0 | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | |||||
| a. Cong Reductions | |||||
| b. SBIR | |||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | |||||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | |||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB | -90 | ||||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1998 PB | 2,910 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: None.
Schedule: None.
Technical: None.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK