(U) COST: (Dollars in thousands)
| PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE | FY 1996 ACTUAL | FY 1997 ESTIMATE | FY 1998 ESTIMATE | FY 1999 ESTIMATE | FY 2000 ESTIMATE | FY 2001 ESTIMATE | FY 2002 ESTIMATE | FY 2003 ESTIMATE | TO COMPLETE | TOTAL PROGRAM |
| X1880 Joint Terminal Project Office | 2,855 | 2,924 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | CONT. | CONT. |
| X0728 EHF SATCOM Terminals | 13,405 | 14,416 | 16,177 | 25,161 | 24,081 | 17,822 | 17,834 | 18,176 | CONT. | CONT. |
| X0731 Fleet Satellite Communications | 17,591 | 19,020 | 849 | 2,247 | 2,914 | 1,547 | 1,537 | 1,572 | CONT. | CONT. |
| TOTAL | 33,851 | 36,360 | 17,026 | 27,408 | 26,995 | 19,369 | 19,371 | 19,748 | CONT. | CONT. |
(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program supports development of shipboard and shore based equipment operating through six communication satellite systems: Fleet Satellite (FLTSAT) Communications, Leased Satellite (LEASAT) Communications, Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS), Ultra High Frequency Follow-On Program (UFO), NATO Allied, and Air Force Satellite Communications (AFSATCOM). The Navy Extremely High Frequency (EHF) Satellite Communications (SATCOM) Program (NESP) provides for the development and production of terminals to provide anti-jam, low probability of intercept/detection communications capability for Command and Control of the fleet. NESP operates with FLTSAT EHF packages and UFO EHF Satellite packages and is the Navy's portion of Milstar. The Milstar program is comprised of satellites, control stations, and aircraft, ship, and ground terminals to provide assured worldwide, secure, anti-jam, survivable communications for the National Command Authority, CINCs, and operational commanders. The Joint Terminal Project Office (JTPO) chartered by tri-service Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) coordinates and directs cross-service interoperability engineering in the individual Service development of EHF satellite terminals; oversees cross-service logistics and infrastructure supportability planning and execution; provides technical support to the Joint Chiefs and Service Staffs, CINCs, and operational commanders; and coordinates MILSATCOM terminal technology transfer among the Services and agencies.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
X1880 Joint Terminal Project Office
2,855 2,924 0 0 0 0 0 0 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Milstar program is comprised of satellites, control stations, and aircraft, ship, and ground terminals to provide assured worldwide, secure, anti-jam, survivable communications for the National Command Authority, CINCs, and operational commanders. The Joint Terminal Program Office (JTPO) chartered by tri-service Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) coordinates individual Service development of MILSATCOM terminals in four areas: (1) cross service terminal interoperability engineering; (2) joint integrated logistics and C3 infrastructure support planning; (3) technical support to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Office of Joint Chiefs of Staff (OJCS), the Commanders in Chief (CINCs), and users and developers; and (4) identification, application and transfer of advanced technology into MILSATCOM terminals. The first Milstar satellite was placed into orbit in February 1994; the second satellite (of six) in November 1995.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS: The JTPO coordinates and directs the development of Milstar and MILSATCOM terminals in four areas: Interoperability, Logistics/Infrastructure support, User Support and Technology.
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ( $1,484) Resolved interoperability issues, identified and tested new user devices and equipment to ensure MILSATCOM interoperability; provided leadership and coordination between Service terminal developers and the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) in executing CJCS interoperability certification policy; planned for and conducted joint interoperability testing with crosslinked satellites on-orbit, and evaluated and recommended interoperability certification of MILSATCOM terminals to support acquisition and/or production decisions.
(U) ($ 422) Lead inter-service EHF SATCOM terminal installation planning, maintained the EHF SATCOM terminal Joint Training Plan and Joint ILSP, identified and resolved joint logistic and infrastructure support issues within MILSATCOM terminal segments.
(U) ($ 519) Supported AFSPC, the OJCS, CINCs, and users in technical network operation, and assisted in resolution of system technical issues. Refined Milstar I communications management system; and supported engineering of Milstar II communications management system. Supported engineering of Milstar communications management systems.
(U) ($ 430) Facilitated and exploited opportunities for MILSATCOM terminal technology transfer by identifying emerging technologies, maintaining MILSATCOM technology database, recommending appropriate technology insertion points for using NDI/COTS. Participated in design of follow-on advanced EHF system, DoD Space Architecture development, provided appropriate terminal segment systems engineering to ensure user-to-user interoperability and use of emerging terminal technologies.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 1,441) Conduct interoperability engineering for additional user interface devices and equipment identified for use with Service MILSATCOM terminals; identify and test user baseband devices to ensure interoperability through MILSATCOM systems; interoperability with DII/DISN, including STEP program; provide leadership and coordination between Service terminal developers and the Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) in executing CJCS interoperability certification policy; plan for and conduct joint interoperability testing in conjunction with on-orbit testing of Milstar I payloads and pre-launch testing of Milstar II payloads; and evaluate interoperability and terminal segment specification compliance of MILSATCOM terminals prior to acquisition and/or production and fielding decisions.
(U) ($ 455) Coordinate cross-service EHF terminal installation planning, maintain Joint Training Plan and Joint ILSP for Low Data Rate (LDR) and Medium Data Rate (MDR) EHF terminals; participate in logistics and infrastructure integrated product teams for emerging multiband MILSATCOM terminals; identify and resolve joint logistics and infrastructure support issues for MILSATCOM terminals.
(U) ($ 463) Support AFSPC, the OJCS, CINCs, and users in technical network planning, and assist in refining system technical applications and expanding operational use of Milstar.
(U) ($ 492) Finalize advanced EHF system documentation, with focus on user-to-user interoperability system engineering in the terminal segments. Continue Space Architecture development supporting DoD Space Architect. Maximize opportunities for MILSATCOM terminal technology transfer by identifying emerging technologies, maintaining MILSATCOM technology database, and recommending appropriate technology insertion points for NDI/COTS. Participate in international efforts to achieve user-to-user interoperability standardization in MILSATCOM.
(U) ($ 73) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
Not applicable
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
Not applicable
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 2,920 3,060 3,106 4,642
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -65 -136 -3,106 -4,642
(U) FY 1998 President's Budget: 2,855 2,924 0 0
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 ($-65K): Reduction for administrative and personal service rescission ($-7K),and FY 1996 SBIR Transfer
($-58K).
FY 1997 ($-136K): Congressional undistributed general adjustments.
FY 1998 ($-3,106K): Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) carryover adjustment ($-48K), minor POM Navy adjustment ($-3K), and realignment to the APN appropriation for FA-18 E/F Program ($-3,055K).
FY 1999 ($-4,642K): NWCF adjustment ($-25K), minor POM Navy adjustment ($-5K) and reduction to fund higher priority Navy programs ($-4,612K).
(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.
(U) Technical: Not Applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: Not Applicable.
B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION: Not Applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO TOTAL
& TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
X0728 EHF SATCOM Terminals
13,405 14,416 16,177 25,161 24,081 17,822 17,834 18,176 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Navy Extremely High Frequency (EHF) Satellite Communications (SATCOM) Program provides for the development and production of terminals to provide anti-jam, low probability of intercept/detection communications capability for Command and Control of the fleet. The terminals will provide physical and electromagnetically survivable, worldwide communications in the current and projected electromagnetic and nuclear threat. Navy EHF terminals are interoperable with Army and Air Force terminals and will operate with Milstar as well as EHF packages on-board Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Follow-On (UFO) Satellites 4 through 10 and FLTSATCOM Satellites 7 and 8. Navy terminals operated during Desert Storm with EHF packages on-board Fleet Satellite 8 and supported fleet operations in Haiti. The increased capability provided by EHF terminals is accomplished by use of the wider bandwidths available at extremely high frequencies, narrow antenna beamwidths, spread spectrum techniques, on-board satellite processing, and advanced signal processing technology.
(U) A Medium Data Rate (MDR) capability is currently under development to utilize the capabilities on Milstar satellites DFS-3 through DFS-6. MDR will provide the only protected (jam resistant and low probability of intercept/detection) MDR data rates from 4.8 kilobits per second (Kbps) to 1.544 megabits per second (Mbps) to the majority of the fleet.
(U) The Navy EHF Communications Controller (NECC) provides automated, netted tactical data Information Exchange Subsystems (IXS) over jam resistant EHF satellite links. The NECC will provide for load and channel sharing, resource management, communications management and planning, network control and monitoring, and services including circuit switching, packet switching, and backward compatibility to UHF SATCOM.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($ 7,547) Began integration of MDR EDMs and continued software development. Began prototype testing MDR Units with the Milstar MDR satellite simulator on-ground (MST-3500).
(U) ($ 2,792) Corrected deficiencies identified during NECC development testing and early operations on the George Washington Battlegroup. Conducted NECC FOT&E. Developed additional functionality.
(U) ($ 3,066) Continued Milstar terminal and MDR development engineering analysis and management.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 8,674) Continue EDM MDR modem and modification kits development and deliver initial kits. Commence ILS development for MDR. Develop and fabricate a ten foot MDR Shore antenna. Begin MDR SATSIM development.
(U) ($ 916) Conduct MDR on-ground cover test (MST 3600) and conduct development testing with the Navy MDR terminal, Army MDR terminals and the Milstar MDR satellite design verification model (MST 4000).
(U) ($ 1616) Commence development of MDR mods to NECC.
(U) ($ 2,866) Continue Milstar terminal and MDR development engineering analysis and management.
(U) ($ 344) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($ 8,954) Deliver additional EDM MDR modem and modification kits; continue MDR ILS development; complete MDR software development; continue MDR SATSIM development; and perform system integration testing to meet MST testing schedule.
(U) ($ 1,553) Perform developmental and interoperability testing (MST-6000) with Navy MDR terminal, Army MDR terminal, and the on-ground flight model Milstar MDR satellite to verify compatibility prior to launch of first Milstar satellite in FY 99.
(U) ($ 1,031) Continue development of NECC interface with MDR appliqués to support High Data Rate (HDR) communications to the submarine fleet.
(U) ($ 1,139) Commence development of Submarine Reportback Compression/Encryption capability to provide transmit and receive message processing for reportback messages to support tactical brevity coding, reportback message compression, and KGV-11 time of day encryption.
(U) ($ 3,500) Continue Milstar terminal and MDR development engineering analysis and management.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($ 5,620) Perform MDR software corrections resulting from MST-6000 testing with flight model MDR satellite. Continue MDR ILS development; prepare MDR software documentation; perform software configuration management; perform system testing; support installation, checkout, and integration of EDM antenna/pedestals on operational platforms, EDM MDR modems, and field change kits in support of MST testing; and complete MDR SATSIM development and modifications.
(U) ($ 1,500) Perform MST-8000 development testing with initial AN/USC-38(V) with MDR, Army MDR terminal, and on-orbit Milstar satellite with MDR to verify compatibility.
(U) ($ 3,700) Perform TECHEVALs/OPEVALs for Navy MDR and participate in Milstar MDR IOT&E.
(U) ($ 1,100) Continue development of NECC modifications. Conduct developmental and operational testing of MDR capable NECC units.
(U) ($ 6,771) Continue development and testing of Submarine Reportback Compression/Encryption. Develop Submarine Satellite Information Exchange System (SSIXS) operational concepts and training and definition of SSIXS baseband equipment and documentation requirements. Develop EHF MDR DAMA capability and architecture to ensure joint service interoperability and fleet optimization; begin requirements definition of software/hardware development. Begin Polar MILSATCOM/Adjunct engineering development for permanent submarine EHF coverage (EHF Polar Adjunct) in polar region.
(U) ($ 1,330) Develop modifications required to maintain compatibility with future EHF satellite constellations (i.e., Advanced EHF). Investigate antenna technology advancements including phased array and flat plate antennas. Begin investigation of Radar Cross Section (RCS) vulnerability reduction measures.
(U) ($ 2,150) Develop technology insertion upgrades which improve terminal Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RM&A). Develop VME and RM&A improvements in order to transition the current MIL-STD terminal to an Open Systems Architecture (OSA) and COTS environment.
(U) ($ 2,990) Continue Milstar terminal and MDR development engineering analysis and management. (Oct 98 through Aug 99)
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 13,872 15,184 23,627 25,522
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -467 -768 -7,450 -361
(U) FY 1998 President's Budget: 13,405 14,416 16,177 25,161
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 ($-467K): Jordanian rescission ($-16K), minor Navy adjustment ($-5K), reduction for administrative and personal service rescission ($-35K), FY 1996 SBIR transfer ($-230K), and reflects other minor Navy fiscal adjustments ($-181K).
FY 1997 ($-768K): Congressional undistributed general adjustments.
FY 1998 ($-7,450K): NWCF carryover adjustment ($-1,112K), reallocation to higher priority Challenge Athena ($-5,800K), minor Navy adjustment ($-21K), NWCF rate adjustment ($-80K), Inflation ($-41K), and other minor adjustments ($-396K).
FY 1999 ($-361K): NWCF carryover adjustment ($-45K), NWCF surcharge reduction ($-105K), minor Navy adjustment ($-31K), NWCF rate adjustment ($-16K), Inflation ($-93K), other minor adjustments ($-71K)
(U) Schedule: The FY 1998 adjustment of -$7,450K delays development of SSIXS and EHF DAMA to FY 1999 and out.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO TOTAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
OPN SHIP* 44,192 55,288 36,293 58,728 73,469 54,477 58,701 47,433 CONT. CONT.
3321000
OPN SHORE* 8,642 18,113 2,304 15,628 38,263 19,203 21,295 34,577 CONT. CONT.
3322000
*Includes EHF terminal installation costs.
(U) Related RDT&E:
(U) PE 0303603F, Milstar
(U) PE 0303601F, Air Force Satellite Communications
(U) PE 0303142A, Army Extremely High Frequency Communications Terminal
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Program MS IV (MDR Full
Milestones Rate Prod) 2/99
Engineering Deliver MDR EDMs 5/97
Milestones Commence NECC MDR
development 7/97
T&E MDR MST3500 6/96 MDR MST4000 3/97 MDR MST6000 7/98 MDR MST8000 12/98
Milestones NECC FOT&E 7/96 MDR OT 1/99
Contract Follow-On RFP MDR Initial Prod
Milestones Release 4/97 Award 10/97
A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)
Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
a. Project Management 375 465 504 715
b. Systems Engineering 2,200 2,369 2,578 4,213
c. Prime Mission Equipment 8,726 9,289 10,140 15,303
d. System Test & Evaluation 920 944 1,337 2,720
e. Integrated Logistics Support 557 669 794 1,161
f. Site/Platform Integration 627 680 824 1,049
Total 13,405 14,416 16,177 25,161
B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)
PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS
Contractor/ Contract
Government Method/ Award/ Perform Project Total
Performing Fund Type Oblig Activity Office FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total
Activity Vehicle Date EAC EAC & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program
Product Development
Raytheon SS/CPFF 1/94 53,943 53,943 8,313 7,120 7,288 7,927 13,098 CONT. CONT.
F/O EHF Studies/Upgrades
NRaD WR 10/93 N/A N/A 3,866 1,718 2,297 2,640 4,225 CONT. CONT.
Other Var Var Var Var 2,294 590 787 1,082 1,550 CONT. CONT.
Support and Management
NRaD WR 10/93 N/A N/A 1,552 1,191 1,378 1,445 2,352 CONT. CONT.
NUWC WR 10/93 N/A N/A 1,350 1,178 1,091 1,163 1,340 CONT. CONT.
Other Var Var Var Var 1,056 790 909 993 998 CONT. CONT.
Test and Evaluation
Other Var Var Var Var 1,267 818 666 927 1,598 CONT. CONT.
Contract
Method/ Award/ Total
Item Fund Type Oblig Delivery FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total
Description Vehicle Date Date & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program
Subtotal Product Development 14,473 9,428 10,372 11,649 18,873 CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Support and Management 3,958 3,159 3,378 3,601 4,690 CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 1,267 818 666 927 1,598 CONT. CONT.
Total Project 19,698 13,405 14,416 16,177 25,161 CONT. CONT.
(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO TOTAL
& TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
X0731 Fleet Satellite Communications
17,591 19,020 849 2,247 2,914 1,547 1,537 1,572 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Fleet Satellite Communications is the principle carrier of Naval communications for Fleet operations worldwide. The project supports development of shipboard and shore based equipment operating through six communication satellite systems: Fleet Satellite (FLTSAT) Communications, Leased Satellite (LEASAT) Communications, Defense Satellite Communication System (DSCS), Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Follow-On Program (UFO), NATO Allied, and Air Force Satellite Communications (AFSATCOM). The principal mission is to provide global, continuous, secure communications between U.S. and Allied Forces via UHF and DSCS satellites and to provide secure anti-jam communications between joint command centers and Fleet commanders using DSCS satellites and Extremely High Frequency (EHF) capable satellites. A secondary mission is to provide rapid transfer of administrative and logistics messages over commercial and military satellites.
(U) Specifically, the efforts of this program develop UHF and Super High Frequency (SHF) communications, network controllers, time division multiplexers, and tactical applications. The FLTSAT/LEASAT/UFO Communications Systems provide Fleet broadcast service to all Navy Ships, Over-the-Horizon Targeting data for TOMAHAWK and Flag configured ships, submarine communications intelligence data, and various other battle group and joint task force communications services.
(U) The Miniature Demand Assigned Multiple Access (Mini-DAMA (M-D) AN/USC-42(V)) system will provide a similar satellite channel utilization efficiency for aircraft and submarines that are now enjoyed by surface ship and shore stations equipped with the larger TD-1271 DAMA Multiplexer and AN/WSC-3. M-D, however, provides greater capacity (8 half duplex networks) vice 4 provided by TD-1271s. M-D will also embed many encryption and data transfer functions which currently require separate equipment. M-D is being developed in two variants: the (V)1 is the submarine ship/shore application and the (V)3 is the airborne version.
(U) Closely aligned with the fielding of M-D is the transition of DAMA operations from the Distributed Control (DC) mode to the Automatic Control (AC) mode. Originally identified as "Auto-DAMA," the control system for the AC mode will provide for dynamic assignment of DAMA slots and will result in an estimated four-fold increase in satellite channel utilization efficiency. Auto-DAMA has become a joint interest program referred to as the Joint (UHF) MILSATCOM Network Integrated (JMINI) control system which will be included as part of Automated Digital Network System (ADNS). The DAMA Semi-Automatic Control (SAC) program is a stepping stone in this process and will provide an estimated two-fold utilization increase; DAMA SAC controllers will be installed during FY 96 - FY 97 with cutover to AC mode in FY 97. JMINI control system is targeted for fielding in FY 00.
(U) The Tactical Intelligence Information Exchange Subsystem (TACINTEL II+) implements the Integrated Special Intelligence Communications portion of the Copernicus and ADNS architecture, to provide services for transfer of Special Intelligence (SI) information between ships, aircraft, and shore activities in support of joint and combined operations. TACINTEL II+ will support real time indications and warning support to joint and component commanders through reliable high speed transfer of sensor data and intelligence information. Enhanced interoperability with other services, agencies, and allies will permit a level of integration of SI operations not achievable with current systems.
(U) The SHF terminals operate within the DSCS. SHF provides high capacity, two way communications for principle Navy ship types and provides Navy connectivity to Allied and Joint Force Command Networks via the DSCS. The Universal Modem is a joint U.S./U.K. development to provide U.S. force and Allied interoperability and anti-jam, protected communications for command and control networks.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($ 1,412) Commenced Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)/ Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) for TACINTEL II Build 1.
(U) ($ 1,981) Continued software development and test and evaluation of TACINTEL II Build 1.
(U) ($ 594) Conducted OPEVAL for TACINTEL II Build 1 software.
(U) ($ 2,033) Continued software development for INTELNET.
(U) ($ 1,000) Integrate, test, and deliver Mini-DAMA (V) 1 systems for DT/OT II for subsequent production options.
(U) ($ 2,004) Conduct Mini-DAMA (V)1 testing (DT/OT II).
(U) ($ 7,441) Continue development of the JMINI Control System Capability.
(U) ($ 708) Obtained Mini-DAMA production approval for second production options for (V)1 and (V)3 units.
(U) ($ 568) Commenced development of SHF SATCOM Architecture for MILSATCOM, COPERNICUS, and CSS.
(U) ($ -150) Reflects an erroneous reduction which was the result of a double posting error for a BTR adjustment.
2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($ 1,260) Complete OPEVAL for TACINTEL II Build 1 software.
(U) ($ 1,019) Achieve Milestone III (MS III) for TACINTEL II Build 1.
(U) ($ 1,200) Initiate Phase II Build 2 development of INTELNET.
(U) ($ 1,537) Complete testing of Mini-DAMA (V)3 (DT/OT II) systems.
(U) ($12,142) Obtain MS 0/I/II decision. Complete Phase I Build 1 of JMINI software and associated functions. Commence development of Phase II Build 2 JMINI software.
(U) ($ 402) Commence software development and test and evaluation of ADNS implementation.
(U) ($ 785) Complete Mini-DAMA SSA IV&V.
(U) ($ 585) Conduct SHF SATCOM interoperability and certification tests with evolving joint MILSATCOM architecture.
(U) ($ 90) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:
(U) ($ 849) Implementation of advanced Special Intelligence (SI) TACINTEL II into Automated Digital Network System (ADNS). An additional $979K is forward financed with FY 97 funding due to low expenditures in FY 96.
4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:
(U) ($ 2,247) Continue implementation of TACINTEL II into ADNS.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 19,536 20,013 13,783 4,797
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -1,945 -993 -12,934 -2,550
(U) FY 1998 President's Budget: 17,591 19,020 849 2,247
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 ($-1945K): Jordanian rescission ($-22K), reduction for administrative, personal service rescission ($-51K), SBIR transfer ($-350K), other Navy adjustments ($-1,372K) and double posting error ($-150K).
FY 1997 ($-993K): Congressional undistributed general adjustments.
FY 1998 ($-12,934K): Reflects Navy POM decision to fund higher priority Navy requirements ($-11,071K), reallocation to higher priority Challenge Athena and Global Broadcast Systems programs ($-2,712K), TACINTEL II+ plus up ($1,375K), BRAC Correction ($500K), reduction due to low expenditures in FY 96 ($-979K), minor pricing Navy adjustments ($-9K), NWCF rate adjustment ($-36K) and Inflation ($-2K).
FY 1999 ($-2,550K): Program rebalancing ($-2,492K), NWCF carryover adjustment ($-27K), minor pricing adjustment ($-4K), NWCF rate adjustment ($-19K) and Inflation ($-8K).
(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.
(U) Technical: Use of existing TD-1271/WSC-5 DAMA hardware and optimize use of previously planned Air Force 5-kHz DAMA controller installations at the NCTAMS.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO TOTAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
OPN SHIP* 41,866 37,288 17,393 35,242 35,342 30,077 33,168 31,867 CONT. CONT.
3321000
OPN SHORE* 3,121 4,030 2,485 60,487 28,428 1569 712 0 CONT. CONT.
3322000
*Includes terminal installation costs.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0303142A, Satellite Communications Ground Environment
(U) PE 0204163N, Communications Automation
(U) PE NSA 0301055, Project Embroidery
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
Program TAC II+ 1 MS III 8/97 TAC II+ 2 MS III 7/98
Milestones M-D Prog Rvw 3/96 M-D(V)1 IOC 3/97
M-D(V)3 IOC 6/97
Engineering TAC II+ 2 PCA 7/97
Milestones
TAC II+ 1 FCA/PCA 2/96
T&E TAC II+ 1 DT 11/96
Milestones TAC II+ 1 OT 3/97
M-D(V)1 DT/OTII 5/96 M-D(V)3 DT/OTII 5/97
Contract Contract Award
Milestones JMINI 9/96
A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)
Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
a. Project Management 305 360 50 222
b. Systems Engineering 4,322 3,245 675 1,752
c. Prime Mission Equipment 10,075 9,469 0 0
d. System Test & Evaluation 1,996 4,079 0 0
e. Integrated Logistics Support 1,043 1,867 124 273
f. Site/Platform Integration 0 0 0 0
Total 17,741(1)
19,020 849 2,247
B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)
PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS
Contractor/ Contract
Government Method/ Award/ Perform Project Total
Performing Fund Type Oblig Activity Office FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total
Activity Vehicle Date EAC EAC & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program
Product Development
Titan FPI 07/89 N/A N/A 1,252 5,241* 8,017 0 0 CONT. CONT.
SRC FFP 10/94 6,305 6,305 10,805 1,096* 0 0 0 CONT. CONT.
NAVSUP/SRC PD 10/94 N/A N/A 1,023 2,085* 566 192 661 CONT. CONT.
Other Var Var 3,485 2,754* 3,403 483 1,091 CONT. CONT.
Support and Management
CSC CPFF Var N/A N/A 1,582 1,380* 638 0 0 CONT. CONT.
NAVAIR/ISC PD N/A N/A 1,176 0* 0 124 273 CONT. CONT.
Other Var Var N/A N/A 2,909 2,071* 4,885 50 222 CONT. CONT.
Test and Evaluation
Other Var Var N/A N/A 4,738 3,114(2)
1,511 0 0 CONT. CONT.
Contract
Method/ Award/ Total
Item Fund Type Oblig Delivery FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total
Description Vehicle Date Date & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program
Subtotal Product Development 16,565 11,176 11,986 675 1,752 CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Support and Management 5,667 3,451 5,523 174 495 CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 4,738 3,114 1,511 0 0 CONT. CONT.
Total Project 26,970 17,741(3)
19,020 849 2,247 CONT. CONT.
a Assumes correction of the erroneous posting reduction ($+150K)
a* Assumes correction of the erroneous posting reduction ($+150K)
a* Assumes correction of the erroneous posting reduction ($+150K)