FY98 Program Element Descriptive Summaries / RDDS

UNCLASSIFIED

FY 1998/1999 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
DATE: February 1997
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7

PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0305927N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Naval Space Surveillance

(U) COST: (Dollars in thousands)
PROJECT

NUMBER &

TITLE

FY 1996

ACTUAL

FY 1997

ESTIMATE

FY 1998

ESTIMATE

FY 1999

ESTIMATE

FY 2000

ESTIMATE

FY 2001

ESTIMATE

FY 2002

ESTIMATE

FY 2003

ESTIMATE

TO

COMPLETE

TOTAL

PROGRAM

R0125 Naval Space Surveillance
712 677 399 529 855 873 892 913 CONT. CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Naval Space Surveillance Fence is an integral component of the U. S. Space Command Space Surveillance Network. This system provides continuous surveillance and unalerted detection of space objects crossing the Continental United States (CONUS). The fence is also the only space surveillance system which provides satellite vulnerability and space control data to the fleet units. It is a multistatic continuous wave radar fence consisting of three transmitter sites, six receiver sites, and a computation/communication center. The transmitter and receiver sites are located on a great circle across the southern CONUS, and the computation/communication center is located at Naval Space Command.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing operational systems.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($250) Prototype and testing completed on fence improvements in accuracy, sensitivity and modeling.

(U) ($150) Completed initial study on integration of optical and fence detection.

(U) ($232) Demonstrated improved calibration techniques for fence operations.

(U) ($80) Developed improved atmospheric drag prediction.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($121) Complete development of integrated and optical fence sensors.

(U) ($182) Prototype high risk components of next generation fence.

(U) ($150) Initiate development of prototype transmitter module.

(U) ($206) Improve accuracy and consistency of angular resolution and chirp processing techniques.

(U) ($18) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research Assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

(U) ($200) Develop and evaluate prototype X-band feed assembly as part of antenna array.

(U) ($100) Evaluate site distribution impacts to current system of X-band implementation.

(U) ($99) Demonstrate impact of high volume processing (10-100 times) on multiple site integration.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

(U) ($529) Initiate integrated prototyping and evaluation of next generation fence capability. Demonstrate and prototype remote processing of observation data. Evaluate transmitter module improvements.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 729 706 707 860
(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -17 -29 -308 -331
(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submission: 712 677 399 529

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustment is due to administrative and personal services rescission (-5) and SBIR assessment (-12). FY 1997 adjustment is due to Congressional Undistributed Reductions (-29). FY 1998 adjustment is due to internal navy adjustments (-307) and inflation (-1). FY 1999 adjustment is due to NWCF and other minor adjustments (-329) and inflation (-2).

(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) Technical: The funding decrease in FY 1998 eliminates efforts to integrate sensors on a near real-time basis, reducing the ability to analyze orbital anomalies and reduce drag modelling, currently the biggest variable in low orbit and re-entry predictions. FY 1999 funding reductions reduce efforts towards fence replacement acquisition increasing the technical and cost risk for the required FY 2003 implementation.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)
Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999
a. Project Management 21 20 12 16
b. Product Development 691 657 387 513
Total 712 677 399 529

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION: ($ in thousands)
Contractor/

Government

Performing

Activity

Contract

Method/

Fund Type

Vehicle

Award/

Oblig

Date

Perform

Activity

EAC

Project

Office

EAC

Total

FY 1995

& Prior

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1997

Budget

FY 1998

Budget

FY 1999

Budget

To

Complete

Total

Program

Product Development
Miscellaneous UNK 712 677 399 529 CONT. CONT.

Support and Management: Not applicable.

Test and Evaluation: Not applicable.

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: Not applicable.
Total

FY 1995

& Prior

FY 1996

Budget

FY 1997

Budget

FY 1998

Budget

FY 1999

Budget

To

Complete

Total

Program

Subtotal Product Development UNK 712 677 399 529 CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Support and Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Project UNK 712 677 399 529 CONT. CONT.

C. (U) FUNDING PROFILE: Not applicable.