
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
OBJECTIVE: THE OBJECTIVE IS TO DEVELOP AN ACTD WHICH WOULD DEMONSTRATE INTEGRATED COLLECTION MANAGEMENT OF SIGINT AND IMINT NATIONAL AND THEATER SENSORS TO OPTIMIZE COLLECTION FOR THEATER NEEDS. JUSTIFICATION: |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
SCHEDULE AND FUNDING: |
|
|||||||||||||||

|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PLAN/MILESTONES/FUNDING:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|

|
|
|||||||||||||||
FUNDING (Budget and POM):
|
|
|||||||||||||||

|
NOT WORLD BASED WITH SIGNIFICANT GAPS |
FILL PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC GAPS |
IMPROVE VISIBILITY BY 10X, OBSERVATIONS BY 2X |
|


|
|
||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE:
FUNDING:
|
|
||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

| WIDE AREA COVERAGE NOT ASSURED |
ASSURE 100 PERCENT OF WIDE AREA AND SELECTED SPOTS ARE
COVERED |
REAL TIME, HIGH QUALITY IMAGERY WITH >10 GFLOP AIRBORNE
INFORMATION PROCESSING |

|
|
|
|
|
|

| UAV COVERAGE IN COMBAT THEATER DIRECT CONTROL BY JFC | NEAR TERM ALL WEATHER/ DAY/ NIGHT IMAGERY |
LOW COST ATTRITABLE VEHICLES PROVIDING 100 PERCENT OF ON-CALL REAL
TIME COVERAGE |
|

|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||

| SMALL SATELLITE SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR | 1 METER STRIP MAP ON CALL |
JOINT/ALLIED USE SAR IMAGERY USING MINIMUM THEATER SUPPORT |
TACTICAL SAR IMAGERY ON CALL FOR UNITED STATES OR ALLIES WITH
ONBOARD PROCESSING |

|
|
|||||||||||||||
FUNDING (ROM):
|
|
|||||||||||||||

| DETECT CARRIERS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS FROM SPACE | PROVIDE WARNING AND COVERAGE FOR USFK ASSETS ANDINFRASTRUCTURE | PROVIDE WARNING OF INTEGRATE PENDING DELIVERY OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS | INTEGRATE WATS INTO C4I/ WARNING SYSTEMS/ DISPLAYS |

|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FUNDING:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

| FOLIAGE/ CAMOUFLAGE OBSCURES AND CONCEALS REAL WORLD TARGETS | ADVANCED SENSORS PENETRATE USING VHF OR UHF RADAR AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING | PENETRATE ANY DENSITY OF FOLIAGE/ CAMOUFLAGE |
COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE WITH COUNTER CC&D RADAR WITH REAL
TIME ONBOARD PROCESSING DEMONSTRATED |

OBJECTIVE:
THE TUAV MUST PROVIDE THE ARMY BRIGADE, USMC MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE, AND NAVY COMMANDERS WITH A DEDICATED UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM THAT DELIVERS TIMELY, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE TARGETING AND OTHER BATTLEFIELD INFORMATION TO THEIR UNITS IN NEAR-REAL TIME (I.E., MILITARY UTILITY).
|
|
|
|
|

| RANGE | 200 km | ||
| TARGET LOCATION ERROR | BEST POSSIBLE USING STATE-OF-THE-ART GPS (NOT TO EXCEED 100 m) | ||
| ON-STATION ENDURANCE | 3 HRS | 4 HRS | |
| LAUNCH AND RECOVERY | UNPREPARED SURFACE/LARGE DECK AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | ADD AUTOMATIC TAKEOFF AND LANDING | |
| SYSTEM MOBILITY | 2 HMMWV/1 TRAILER | ||
| SYSTEM DEPLOYABILITY | SINGLE C-130 (4 A/V AND GROUND EQUIPMENT) | ||
| PAYLOAD | EO/IR | SAR | |
| INTEGRATION | EMI SHIELDING/CORROSION INHIBITION | ||
| DATA LINK | COMPLIANT WITH JII (200 km LOS AT SEA LEVEL) | COMMON DATA LINK | |
| PROPULSION SYSTEM | AS PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR | HEAVY FUEL ENGINE | |
| COST | $350K @ 33rd AND $300K @ 100th A/V AND SENSOR | ||

TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE WARRIOR |
|||
OBJECTIVE:
DEMONSTRATE A SECURE, ROBUST, SEAMLESS, DIGITAL, MULTIMEDIA, INFORMATION TRANSPORT CAPABILITY FOR THE ARMY TACTICAL USER THAT IS COMPLIANT WITH AND EXPLOITS EMERGING COMMERCIAL STANDARDS AND THE DISN ARCHITECTURE.
|
|
||
|
|
|
||

CAPABILITY |
EXIT CRITERIA |
EXIT CRITERIA |
|
| SATCOM OTM | STEERED UHF YAGI LIMITED COMMERCIAL |
LOW PROFILE UHF COMMERCIAL OTM EXPLOIT COMMERCIAL SAT PCS IMPROVED DSCS |
OTM DSCS MILITARIZED SAT PCS WIDEBAND RAP OTM SATCOM |
| RADIO ACCESS POINT (RAP) | NONE |
WIDEBAND SWITCHING 45MBps TRUNK RADIO USE EXISTING RADIOS |
ATM SWITCHING 45-155 MBps OTM TRUNK MBMR |
| RANGE EXTENSION | UHF SURROGATE SATCOM |
45MBps AIRCRAFT RELAY OTM TRUNK TO AIRCRAFT |
155MBps AIRCRAFT RELAY 45MBps UAV OTM |
| MODELING & SIMULATION |
MSE SPM (INCLUDE CONNECTIVITY MODEL) CAC2 SPM DIS-COMPLIANT SINCGARS RADIO |
EXTEND SPMs TO INCLUDE SIP, EPLRS DATA HOTSPOT ANALYSIS WIDEBAND DATA RADIO MODEL WIDEBAND TRUNK RADIO MODEL RAP MODEL |
DIS-COMPLIANT ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS TOOLS REAL TIME OTM NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS |

|
The emphasis of the Battlespace C2 ATD (BC2) is on the Cdr's and the Digital Battle Staffs'
information and visualization requirements, consistent with Joint Initiatives.
The objective is to develop, integrate, and refine information and knowledge base technologies and systems into:
Battlelabs: BCBL-(G,L,H), MBBL, DBBL |
|
|
|
BC2-ATD is a product integration and demonstration program, which is consistent with
the DoD C3TAP and:
|

|
|
|
|

STO #III.G.08 |
|||
|
|
||
|
|
|
||

CAPABILITY |
(Baseline - No Automation) |
||
|
1.0 Good 0.5 Bad 0.6 Good 0.4 Bad |
1.2 Good 0.6 Bad 0.6 Good 0.4 Bad |
1.5 Good 1.2 Bad 0.7 Good 0.5 Bad |
|
0.5 Good 0.3 Bad 0.3 Good 0.2 Bad |
0.8 Good 0.6 Bad 0.7 Good 0.5 Bad |
1.0 Good 0.7 Bad 0.9 Good 0.6 Bad |
|
90 Sec | 15-20 Sec | 10-15 Sec |
|
N/A |
0.06* |
0.01* |
* INDICATES MSAT-AIR ATD BASED VOLUMES. |
|||

|
|
|
|
APPLICATIONS: |

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|

|
|
*1996 Air Mobility Master Plan |
|

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
FUNDING ($K): |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||||||||
FUNDING ($K): *PENDING REDUCTION. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|

|
|
||||||||||||||||||
FUNDING ($K): |
|
||||||||||||||||||

|
|
|
|
