
3.2.1 Warfighter Needs
Integrated High Payoff Rocket Propulsion Technology
(IHPRPT). IHPRPT goals translate into payoffs to the warfighter
in terms of increased warfighter capabilities. Payoffs to space
launch systems include performance, cost, and reliability improvements
to existing launch systems, expendable launch systems, and new
reusable vehicles. The operational increases for boost and orbit
transfer systems by the year 2000, 2005, and 2010 include 9%,
16%, and 22% increases in payload capability for new expendable
boosters (over the 25,000 lb baseline to low-Earth orbit (LEO)).
An alternative to increasing the payload on a lift vehicle would
be to launch payloads on smaller, more capable vehicles to reduce
the need for costly heavy-lift vehicles. The resulting launch
cost reductions would equate to savings of 19%, 31%, and 42% in
cost per pound to orbit. These savings are in addition to the
savings seen from design and process changes. For a new reusable
launch system, the payload improvements approach 71%, 127%, and
206% over the life of the vehicle by 2000, 2005, and 2010.
Spacecraft goals will result in increased warfighter payoffs through reliable critical information gathering and global communication capabilities at reduced costs. Satellites in geosynchronous orbit will be able to extend their on-orbit life up to 45%, increase repositioning capabilities by a factor of 2 to 5, or increase useful mission payload mass by 10% to 30%. This last capability can mean an ability to increase the number and/or types of transponders, potentially manifest the same payload on less expensive launch vehicles, or increase the survivability of the satellite by allowing for increased shielding material. Communication and reconnaissance satellites will be able to reposition more often and more rapidly to support the warfighter needs in local theaters of operation without significantly sacrificing satellite life. More reliable deployment and on-orbit operation throughout the life of the satellite will provide greater assurance in asset availability. Higher performance compact propulsion systems will also enable the deployment of smaller satellites into higher energy orbits. For medium-lift vehicle class geosynchronous satellites launched at a conservative rate of 6 per year, meeting the IHPRPT goals would result in cost savings of $60 million, $130 million, and $240 million by 2000, 2005, and 2010 respectively.
3.2.2 Space Propulsion
3.2.2.1 Goals and Timeframes. The
IHPRPT initiative was started in FY 1994, with primary program
impacts beginning in FY 1995. The program is based on achieving
the following goals (with respect to 1993 state-of-the-art baselines)
for Boost and Orbit Transfer (B/OT) and Spacecraft (S/C). In
space platforms the following B/OT and S/C goals exist:
| 2000* | S/C: | -25% Failure Rate, +0.02 Mass Fraction (Solid), +14 sec Isp***,
-15% Hardware Costs, -15% Support Costs, +30% Thrust/Wt (Liq) +10% Isp (Chem), +15% Mass Fraction, +15% Thruster Efficiency (Advanced) |
| 2005* | S/C: | -50% Failure Rate, +0.03 Mass Fraction (Solid), +10 sec Isp***,
-25% Hardware Costs,
-25% Support Costs, +60% Thrust/Wt (Liq) +15% Isp (Chem), +25% Mass Fraction, +30% Thruster Efficiency (Advanced) |
| 2010* | S/C: | -75% Failure Rate, +0.04 Mass Fraction (Solid), +20 sec Isp***,
-35% Hardware Costs,
-35% Support Costs, +100% Thrust/Wt (Liq) + 20% Isp (Chem), +35% Mass Fraction, +50% Thruster Efficiency (Advanced) |
| * All percentage goals are percent change from the baseline. | ||
| ** An additional goal for reusable propulsion systems of 20 missions between removal is also included in Boost and Orbit Transfer Propulsion | ||
| *** Boost and Orbit Transfer Isp goal
represents a combination of specific propulsion improvements at the following respective levels
Cryogenic Engine: 1% (2000), 2% (2005), 3%(2010); Hydrocarbon Engine: 10% (2000),14% (2005), 17% (2010); Solid Motor (clean propellant): 7% (2000), 10% (2005), 13% (2010); Hybrid Motor: 8% (2000), 11% (2005), 15% (2010) | ||
3.2.2.3 Related Federal and Private Sector Efforts. All DoD agencies, NASA, and industry participate in IHPRPT. Industry rocket propulsion IR&D investment for FY95 is approximately $55M. NASA FY95 investment for IHPRPT related programs for the reuseable launch vehicle is approximately $24M.
3.2.3 S&T Investment Strategy
The key to the IHPRPT process is the simultaneous achievement
of the goals. Technology demonstrations conducted during each
of the three phases will quantify the degree of success in reaching
the goals. The technology demonstrators do not have to be a complete
propulsion system demonstration. They may be individual components
or a combination of components. The requirement is to prove justifiable,
analytical connectivity that the compilation of the demonstrated
technologies would work together as an acceptable propulsion unit.
As a metric, the empirical or analytical data will be compared
to baselines identified at the initiation of IHPRPT. Following
demonstration, the technologies may transition economically to
new propulsion systems or to improvements to current propulsion
systems.
3.2.3.1 Technology Demonstrations. Technology Demonstrations
for IHPRPT are divided into the three fundamental propulsion classes:
(1) Boost and Orbit Transfer, (2) Spacecraft, and (3) Tactical
(Tactical is book kept in conventional weapons). Each class is
a separate family of demonstrations.
3.2.3.1.1 Boost and Orbit Transfer Propulsion. These
demonstrations, when successful, fulfill DTO (SP10). The demonstrators
for this mission application area address propulsion systems which
lift payloads from ground level to orbit elevation (boost propulsion).
Specific boost demonstrations will occur at the end of each IHPRPT
phase. In 2000 the component improvements will feed into an integrated
powerhead demonstration. In 2005, further component improvements
will integrate into a high chamber pressure (4000psi) booster
class demo.
3.2.3.1.2 Orbit Transfer Propulsion. These demonstrations,
when successful, fulfill DTO (SP11). The demonstrations for this
mission application are divided into two areas: chemical propulsion
and non-chemical propulsion and address propulsion systems which
move payloads from one orbit (such as low-Earth orbit (LEO)) to
another orbit elevation (geosynchronous orbit (GEO)). Orbit transfer
component improvements will feed into a FY00 high performance
(1200psi chamber pressure) upper stage/orbit transfer demo and
a FY05 high performance (1500psi chamber pressure) upper stage/orbit
transfer demo.
3.2.3.1.3 Spacecraft Propulsion. These demonstrations,
when successful, fulfill DTO (SP12). The technology demonstrators
for this mission application include two areas: chemical propulsion
and non-chemical propulsion, e.g., solar electric and solar thermal.
In all cases, these system demonstrations will be conducted at
simulated altitude conditions permitting direct measurement of
performance at space conditions. Solar electric demonstrations
(pulsed plasma thruster and hall thruster) by 2000 and 2005 will
integrate all developments for satellite stationkeeping and repositioning.
Demonstrations by 2010 will demonstrate advanced solar thermal
propulsion systems and advanced solar electric propulsion systems
(ion thrusters) for orbit transfer missions.
3.2.3.2 Technology Development. Once the goals and payoffs
have been established and confirmed as worthwhile, then the technology
advancements needed to achieve the goals are determined. The
propulsion technologies in BO/T and S/C are divided into the same
four component technology areas. These four areas, which represent
the rocket propulsion system technology improvement areas are:
propellants, propellant management devices, combustion and energy
conversion devices, and control systems. The efforts in the propellant
area includes solid, liquid, hybrid, gels, and liner development.
Propellant management efforts include work in tanks, feed systems,
bladders, turbomachinery, thermal protection systems, cases, pressurization
systems, and insulations. Combustion and energy conversion efforts
include work in injectors, igniters, combustion chambers, nozzles,
gas generators, preburners, and all components of electric and
solar propulsion systems (except the propellant). Control system
work includes actuator, health monitoring, thrust management,
ordnance, valve, and thrust vector control system development.
The projects are technology specific as opposed to being system
specific allowing for global propulsion system improvements applicable
to all rocket propulsion systems. Goals within each application
area address where the research and development specialists will
overcome operational deficiencies and meet requirements and needs
defined by the propulsion system users. Subsequently, goals are
broken down into the component technology improvements needed
to fulfill the achievement of the goals. These component improvements
are identified and represent component area objectives that the
technologists will work towards in laboratory research and development
projects.
This goal/objective relationship connects the research and development
labs to the user community in a way that streamlines the work
done by both communities, and enables the needs of both groups
to be satisfied. The result of the IHPRPT process is the fulfillment
of a set of goals which integrates the technologists with the
user community, and provides maximum payoffs for future space
systems.
3.2.3.3 Basic Research. The Phillips Laboratory Propulsion
Directorate has several basic research projects supporting development
in boost, orbit transfer, and spacecraft propulsion. In boost
and orbit transfer, one combustion development project (Supercritical
combustion), two propellant development projects (Chemically bound
excited states and Non-equilibrium flow characteristics), and
three materials development projects for rocket components (Synthesis,
Carbon materials research, and Material mechanics research) exist.
In spacecraft propulsion, the Plasma diagnostics project supports
electric propulsion development.