GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
The following instructions apply to the requirements of Volume IV, Appendix IV-G, "LCCE and
LCCE Methodology (Total EELV Program)." The Offeror shall satisfy all requirements in the
following LCCE and Methodology instructions. However, only LCCE cost data shall be
included in Volume IV, Appendix IV-G. The narrative portion of Volume IV, Appendix IV-G is
limited to 100 pages; however, the number of pages of spreadsheets displaying the LCCE is
unlimited.
1. The Offeror shall develop, aggregate, and document a detailed level LCCE for the proposed
concept. The LCCE is defined as the total "cradle-to-grave" costs across all acquisition phases,
to include costs for research, design, development, test and evaluation, production, operations,
and maintenance. Costs for support of the system (such as Government bases and ranges) shall
also be included in the LCCE.
2. The EELV LCCE shall include only those allowable EELV costs allocable to the Government
(DoD, civil and intelligence communities). Although the Offeror will be expected to incorporate
considerations of potential market impacts and forces of the entire National Mission Model
(NMM), including the requirements of the commercial component of the NMM, only costs
attributable to the Government shall be included in the EELV LCCE.
3. The LCCE must consider all cost relevant to the EELV program, including all EELV system
contracts and other Government costs (including, but not limited to, range costs, facility costs,
and infrastructure costs). Although normally included in Government-developed LCCEs,
Government program management costs need not be estimated in the Offeror's LCCE;
Government program management costs will be estimated by the SPO. Examples of typical
Government program management costs include SPO military and civilian pay, Government
travel, Aerospace Corporation support, Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance
Contractor support, supplies and equipment, etc.
4. Costs shall be based on the requirements of the NMM identified by the Government (RFP
Annex C-1), and/or operational support requirements, design and test requirements, and other
technical data as delineated by the Offeror's concept. The costs shall be displayed by
Government fiscal years and include overhead, general and administrative expense, and
estimated fee or profit.
5. The LCCE shall be presented at the 50th percentile confidence level. The cost-risk analysis
supporting the development of this 50th percentile level shall utilize valid techniques and
acceptable approaches to distribution range development and summarization, and will be
performed by acquisition module/phase (e.g., Low Cost Concept Validation (LCCV), Pre-Engineering and Manufacturing Development (Pre-EMD), EMD, Production, and Operations
and Support (O&S)). This cost-risk analysis shall contain narratives explaining all
methodologies used to determine risk magnitudes of identified risk areas, quantification of these
risk magnitudes into cost impacts, and spreadsheets or other formats containing calculations,
algorithms, etc., that fully support an understanding of the performance of the cost-risk analyses.
The cost-risk analysis shall include, but is not limited to, the following areas of risk: Design and
Engineering, Technology (including the use of foreign technology, components, and non-domestically manufactured products), Cost Estimating, Manufacturing, Schedule, Supportability,
Integration, and Threat. (The Air Force Risk Analysis Handbook may be helpful in conducting
an acceptable risk analysis.) Cost drivers (e.g., high cost and high risk elements) and LCCE
sensitivities (e.g., impacts resulting from changes in major cost drivers, risk drivers, or
assumptions) shall be identified and explained. Cost risk quantification shall be performed and
applied at the cost estimating level.
6. The cost estimating methodologies derived and utilized in the development of the LCCE shall
be clearly documented to allow assessment of the reasonableness and completeness of costs
presented in the LCCE.
LCCE INSTRUCTIONS
7. The Offeror shall develop a LCCE in accordance with the following cost estimating
guidelines, general ground rules, and assumptions. The LCCE shall be presented in spreadsheet
format. The number of pages of spreadsheets displaying the LCCE is unlimited.
a. The implications of the provided SPD NMM (RFP Annex C-1) shall be addressed in
the LCCE, to include the Offeror's commercial market projections.
b. LCCE shall be shown by acquisition life cycle module/phase (i.e., LCCV, Pre-EMD,
EMD, Production, O&S, etc.).
c. LCCE shall extend through Fiscal Year (FY) 2020.
d. OSD-approved 95-1 inflation indices shall be used. A copy of the directed inflation
indices are included in RFP Annex G-1.
e. LCCE shall be provided at the point estimate level (i.e., the aggregate of initial
estimates from cost models/methodologies, prior to any dollars added for risk) and the 50th
percentile confidence level.
f. LCCE detail shall be shown at the level each element was estimated.
g. LCCE shall be structured as reflected in the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
Dictionary submitted in the Offeror's proposal.
h. LCCE shall be developed and shown by Government fiscal years in constant FY 1995
and Then-Year (TY) dollars.
i. The EELV Baseline Funding Profile for the EMD Module is provided, for planning
and reference purposes only, in RFP Annex G-2. For the pre-EMD module, $66 million and $64
million have been budgeted and programmed in FY96 and FY97, respectively. The pre-EMD
dollars will be divided between two contracts.
LCCE METHODOLOGY DOCUMENTATION INSTRUCTIONS
8. The LCCE documentation will include a detailed discussion of the methodologies employed
for each WBS element at which the LCCE was estimated. It shall be prepared in concert with
the following requirements and be limited to 100 pages:
a. Detailed LCCE Approach/Methodology.
(1) Discussion of all levels of the WBS shall contain:
(a) WBS element definitions.
(b) acquisition life cycle phase identifications.
(c) cost phasing approach.
(d) detailed explanation of estimating approach/methodologies used,
including Cost Estimating Relationships (CERs), factors, analogues,
models and tools, etc.
(e) explanation of risk assessment/analysis and methods employed for
quantifying risk.
(f) identification of sources of data.
b. Estimating approaches shall be presented at the WBS level at which the LCCE was
developed. "Roll-up" is an acceptable description of methodology if the estimate was developed
at a lower WBS level. If an estimating methodology is identical for all lower level elements,
methodology need only be described once at the next highest WBS level.
c. Key ground rules and assumptions, business base assumptions, and trade analyses, shall
also be clearly documented.
RFP ANNEX G-1
OSD-Approved
95-1 Inflation Indices
OSD-APPROVED 95-1 RAW INFLATION INDICES
| OPR: SAF/FMCEE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DATE OF OSD INFLATION RATES FOR PERSONNEL AND NON-PERSONNEL: 10 JANUARY 1995 |
|
|
|
| DATE OF SAF/FMC ISSUE: 31 JANUARY 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USAF RAW INFLATION INDICES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASED ON OSD RAW INFLATION RATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASE YEAR FY 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERA- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL |
TIONS |
RESEARCH, |
AIRCRAFT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICE |
& MAIN- |
DEVELOP- |
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
MILITARY |
COMPEN- |
& WAGE |
TENANCE: |
MENT, |
MILITARY |
MISSILE |
OTHER |
|
| FISCAL |
PAY |
OTHER
|
SATION |
RETIRE- |
BOARD |
NON-PAY, |
TESTING, |
CONSTRU- |
PROCURE- |
PROCURE- |
|
| YEAR |
BASE |
EXPENSES |
TOTAL |
MENT |
PAY |
NON-POL |
EVAL. |
CTION |
MENT |
MENT |
FUEL |
|
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3400) |
(3400) |
(3600) |
(3300) |
(3010/20) |
(3080) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1983 |
0.676 |
0.714 |
0.680 |
0.999 |
0.615 |
0.685 |
0.685 |
0.685 |
0.659 |
0.685 |
1.003 |
| 1984 |
0.696 |
0.737 |
0.700 |
1.033 |
0.634 |
0.711 |
0.711 |
0.711 |
0.711 |
0.711 |
0.910 |
| 1985 |
0.724 |
0.758 |
0.727 |
1.069 |
0.669 |
0.736 |
0.736 |
0.736 |
0.736 |
0.736 |
0.871 |
| 1986 |
0.753 |
0.776 |
0.755 |
1.075 |
0.676 |
0.756 |
0.756 |
0.756 |
0.756 |
0.756 |
0.681 |
| 1987 |
0.770 |
0.794 |
0.772 |
1.111 |
0.713 |
0.777 |
0.777 |
0.777 |
0.777 |
0.777 |
0.625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1988 |
0.787 |
0.815 |
0.790 |
1.113 |
0.777 |
0.800 |
0.800 |
0.800 |
0.800 |
0.800 |
0.522 |
| 1989 |
0.815 |
0.843 |
0.818 |
1.008 |
0.805 |
0.834 |
0.834 |
0.834 |
0.834 |
0.834 |
0.522 |
| 1990 |
0.846 |
0.869 |
0.848 |
1.046 |
0.835 |
0.867 |
0.867 |
0.867 |
0.867 |
0.867 |
0.619 |
| 1991 |
0.879 |
0.899 |
0.881 |
1.073 |
0.868 |
0.904 |
0.904 |
0.904 |
0.904 |
0.904 |
1.158 |
| 1992 |
0.916 |
0.931 |
0.917 |
1.102 |
0.904 |
0.930 |
0.930 |
0.930 |
0.930 |
0.930 |
0.987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1993 |
0.951 |
0.960 |
0.952 |
0.975 |
0.939 |
0.955 |
0.955 |
0.955 |
0.955 |
0.955 |
1.000 |
| 1994 |
0.976 |
0.978 |
0.976 |
0.989 |
0.971 |
0.974 |
0.974 |
0.974 |
0.974 |
0.974 |
1.142 |
| 1995 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
1.000 |
| 1996 |
1.025 |
1.020 |
1.024 |
0.949 |
1.025 |
1.030 |
1.030 |
1.030 |
1.030 |
1.030 |
1.056 |
| 1997 |
1.054 |
1.047 |
1.054 |
0.909 |
1.055 |
1.061 |
1.061 |
1.061 |
1.061 |
1.061 |
1.070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1998 |
1.087 |
1.075 |
1.086 |
0.931 |
1.080 |
1.093 |
1.093 |
1.093 |
1.093 |
1.093 |
1.102 |
| 1999 |
1.121 |
1.103 |
1.119 |
0.950 |
1.103 |
1.126 |
1.126 |
1.126 |
1.126 |
1.126 |
1.135 |
| 2000 |
1.147 |
1.123 |
1.145 |
0.963 |
1.126 |
1.159 |
1.159 |
1.159 |
1.159 |
1.159 |
1.169 |
| 2001 |
1.174 |
1.143 |
1.171 |
0.976 |
1.150 |
1.194 |
1.194 |
1.194 |
1.194 |
1.194 |
1.204 |
| 2002 |
1.202 |
1.163 |
1.198 |
0.989 |
1.174 |
1.230 |
1.230 |
1.230 |
1.230 |
1.230 |
1.240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2003 |
1.230 |
1.184 |
1.226 |
1.002 |
1.199 |
1.267 |
1.267 |
1.267 |
1.267 |
1.267 |
1.277 |
| 2004 |
1.259 |
1.205 |
1.254 |
1.015 |
1.224 |
1.305 |
1.305 |
1.305 |
1.305 |
1.305 |
1.316 |
| 2005 |
1.288 |
1.227 |
1.283 |
1.028 |
1.250 |
1.344 |
1.344 |
1.344 |
1.344 |
1.344 |
1.355 |
| 2006 |
1.319 |
1.249 |
1.313 |
1.042 |
1.276 |
1.384 |
1.384 |
1.384 |
1.384 |
1.384 |
1.396 |
| 2007 |
1.350 |
1.271 |
1.343 |
1.056 |
1.303 |
1.426 |
1.426 |
1.426 |
1.426 |
1.426 |
1.438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERA- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL |
TIONS |
RESEARCH, |
AIRCRAFT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICE |
& MAIN- |
DEVELOP- |
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
MILITARY |
COMPEN- |
& WAGE |
TENANCE: |
MENT, |
MILITARY |
MISSILE |
OTHER |
|
| FISCAL |
PAY |
OTHER
|
SATION |
RETIRE- |
BOARD |
NON-PAY, |
TESTING, |
CONSTRU- |
PROCURE- |
PROCURE- |
|
| YEAR |
BASE |
EXPENSES |
TOTAL |
MENT |
PAY |
NON-POL |
EVAL. |
CTION |
MENT |
MENT |
FUEL |
|
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3500) |
(3400) |
(3400) |
(3600) |
(3300) |
(3010/20) |
(3080) |
|
| 2008 |
1.381 |
1.294 |
1.374 |
1.070 |
1.330 |
1.469 |
1.469 |
1.469 |
1.469 |
1.469 |
1.481 |
| 2009 |
1.414 |
1.317 |
1.405 |
1.084 |
1.358 |
1.513 |
1.513 |
1.513 |
1.513 |
1.513 |
1.525 |
| 2010 |
1.447 |
1.340 |
1.438 |
1.098 |
1.386 |
1.558 |
1.558 |
1.558 |
1.558 |
1.558 |
1.571 |
| 2011 |
1.481 |
1.364 |
1.471 |
1.113 |
1.416 |
1.605 |
1.605 |
1.605 |
1.605 |
1.605 |
1.618 |
| 2012 |
1.516 |
1.389 |
1.505 |
1.128 |
1.445 |
1.653 |
1.653 |
1.653 |
1.653 |
1.653 |
1.667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2013 |
1.552 |
1.413 |
1.539 |
1.143 |
1.476 |
1.702 |
1.702 |
1.702 |
1.702 |
1.702 |
1.717 |
| 2014 |
1.588 |
1.439 |
1.575 |
1.158 |
1.507 |
1.754 |
1.754 |
1.754 |
1.754 |
1.754 |
1.768 |
| 2015 |
1.625 |
1.464 |
1.611 |
1.173 |
1.538 |
1.806 |
1.806 |
1.806 |
1.806 |
1.806 |
1.821 |
| 2016 |
1.664 |
1.490 |
1.648 |
1.189 |
1.571 |
1.860 |
1.860 |
1.860 |
1.860 |
1.860 |
1.876 |
| 2017 |
1.703 |
1.517 |
1.686 |
1.204 |
1.603 |
1.916 |
1.916 |
1.916 |
1.916 |
1.916 |
1.932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2018 |
1.743 |
1.544 |
1.725 |
1.220 |
1.637 |
1.974 |
1.974 |
1.974 |
1.974 |
1.974 |
1.990 |
| 2019 |
1.784 |
1.572 |
1.765 |
1.236 |
1.672 |
2.033 |
2.033 |
2.033 |
2.033 |
2.033 |
2.050 |
| 2020 |
1.826 |
1.600 |
1.805 |
1.253 |
1.707 |
2.094 |
2.094 |
2.094 |
2.094 |
2.094 |
2.111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2021 |
1.868 |
1.628 |
1.847 |
1.269 |
1.742 |
2.157 |
2.157 |
2.157 |
2.157 |
2.157 |
2.175 |
| 2022 |
1.912 |
1.657 |
1.889 |
1.286 |
1.779 |
2.221 |
2.221 |
2.221 |
2.221 |
2.221 |
2.240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2023 |
1.957 |
1.687 |
1.933 |
1.303 |
1.816 |
2.288 |
2.288 |
2.288 |
2.288 |
2.288 |
2.307 |
| 2024 |
2.003 |
1.717 |
1.977 |
1.320 |
1.855 |
2.357 |
2.357 |
2.357 |
2.357 |
2.357 |
2.376 |
| 2025 |
2.050 |
1.748 |
2.023 |
1.338 |
1.894 |
2.427 |
2.427 |
2.427 |
2.427 |
2.427 |
2.447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TABLE USE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RAW INDICES ARE USED TO CONVERT CONSTANT DOLLARS IN ONE YEAR TO CONSTANT DOLLARS IN ANOTHER YEAR. |
| USE WEIGHTED INDICES TO CONVERT CONSTANT TO THEN-YEAR DOLLARS, AND VICE
VERSA. |
|
|
|
OSD APPROVED 95-1 WEIGHTED INFLATION INDICES
| OPR: SAF/FMCEE |
|
|
|
DATE OF OSD INFLATION RATES : 10 JAN 1995 |
|
|
| DATE OF OSD OUTLAY RATES : 18 JAN 1995 |
DATE OF SAF/FMCEE ISSUE : 31 JAN 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USAF WEIGHTED INFLATION INDICES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASED ON OSD RAW INFLATION AND OUTLAY RATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASE YEAR FY 1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESEARCH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVELOP- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERA- |
MENT, |
MILITARY |
MILITARY |
MILITARY |
AIRCRAFT |
AIRCRAFT |
MISSILE |
MISSILE |
OTHER |
OTHER |
|
TIONS & |
TEST & |
CONSTR- |
CONSTR- |
CONSTR- |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
| FISCAL |
MAINTEN |
EVALUA |
UCTION: |
UCTION: |
UCTION: |
EMENT |
MENT |
EMENT |
EMENT |
EMENT |
MENT |
| YEAR |
ANCE |
TION |
AF |
GUARD |
RESERVE |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
|
(3400) |
(3600) |
(3300) |
(3830) |
(3730) |
(3010) |
(3010) |
(3020) |
(3020) |
(3080) |
(3080) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1984 |
0.720 |
0.726 |
0.751 |
0.753 |
0.744 |
0.716 |
0.749 |
0.724 |
0.754 |
0.717 |
0.746 |
| 1985 |
0.744 |
0.750 |
0.768 |
0.765 |
0.766 |
0.739 |
0.773 |
0.746 |
0.775 |
0.741 |
0.771 |
| 1986 |
0.767 |
0.769 |
0.790 |
0.781 |
0.782 |
0.760 |
0.801 |
0.765 |
0.811 |
0.762 |
0.804 |
| 1987 |
0.796 |
0.804 |
0.818 |
0.809 |
0.808 |
0.781 |
0.833 |
0.795 |
0.846 |
0.784 |
0.834 |
| 1988 |
0.822 |
0.825 |
0.849 |
0.854 |
0.843 |
0.806 |
0.875 |
0.818 |
0.877 |
0.805 |
0.866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1989 |
0.855 |
0.865 |
0.880 |
0.876 |
0.880 |
0.839 |
0.903 |
0.847 |
0.916 |
0.841 |
0.896 |
| 1990 |
0.890 |
0.892 |
0.931 |
0.939 |
0.950 |
0.873 |
0.932 |
0.882 |
0.933 |
0.872 |
0.923 |
| 1991 |
0.924 |
0.925 |
0.958 |
0.949 |
0.967 |
0.909 |
0.970 |
0.916 |
0.963 |
0.907 |
0.947 |
| 1992 |
0.951 |
0.952 |
0.976 |
0.967 |
0.990 |
0.934 |
0.993 |
0.944 |
0.976 |
0.940 |
0.977 |
| 1993 |
0.967 |
0.974 |
1.004 |
0.995 |
1.019 |
0.958 |
1.012 |
0.970 |
1.002 |
0.964 |
0.996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1994 |
0.995 |
0.995 |
1.034 |
1.021 |
1.030 |
0.978 |
1.037 |
1.001 |
1.031 |
0.987 |
1.026 |
| 1995 |
1.023 |
1.024 |
1.065 |
1.052 |
1.061 |
1.005 |
1.068 |
1.031 |
1.062 |
1.015 |
1.056 |
| 1996 |
1.054 |
1.055 |
1.097 |
1.083 |
1.092 |
1.035 |
1.100 |
1.062 |
1.093 |
1.046 |
1.087 |
| 1997 |
1.086 |
1.086 |
1.130 |
1.116 |
1.125 |
1.066 |
1.133 |
1.093 |
1.126 |
1.077 |
1.120 |
| 1998 |
1.118 |
1.119 |
1.163 |
1.149 |
1.159 |
1.098 |
1.167 |
1.126 |
1.160 |
1.109 |
1.154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1999 |
1.152 |
1.152 |
1.198 |
1.184 |
1.194 |
1.131 |
1.202 |
1.160 |
1.195 |
1.143 |
1.188 |
| 2000 |
1.186 |
1.187 |
1.234 |
1.219 |
1.229 |
1.165 |
1.238 |
1.195 |
1.231 |
1.177 |
1.224 |
| 2001 |
1.222 |
1.223 |
1.271 |
1.256 |
1.266 |
1.200 |
1.275 |
1.231 |
1.268 |
1.212 |
1.261 |
| 2002 |
1.259 |
1.259 |
1.309 |
1.293 |
1.304 |
1.236 |
1.313 |
1.268 |
1.306 |
1.248 |
1.298 |
| 2003 |
1.296 |
1.297 |
1.349 |
1.332 |
1.343 |
1.273 |
1.352 |
1.306 |
1.345 |
1.286 |
1.337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2004 |
1.335 |
1.336 |
1.389 |
1.372 |
1.384 |
1.312 |
1.393 |
1.345 |
1.385 |
1.324 |
1.378 |
| 2005 |
1.375 |
1.376 |
1.431 |
1.413 |
1.425 |
1.351 |
1.435 |
1.385 |
1.427 |
1.364 |
1.419 |
|
|
RESEARCH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVELOP- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERA- |
MENT, |
MILITARY |
MILITARY |
MILITARY |
AIRCRAFT |
AIRCRAFT |
MISSILE |
MISSILE |
OTHER |
OTHER |
|
TIONS & |
TEST & |
CONSTR- |
CONSTR- |
CONSTR- |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
PROCUR |
| FISCAL |
MAINTEN |
EVALUA |
UCTION: |
UCTION: |
UCTION: |
EMENT |
MENT |
EMENT |
EMENT |
EMENT |
MENT |
| YEAR |
ANCE |
TION |
AF |
GUARD |
RESERVE |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
SPECIAL |
OTHER |
|
(3400) |
(3600) |
(3300) |
(3830) |
(3730) |
(3010) |
(3010) |
(3020) |
(3020) |
(3080) |
(3080) |
| 2006 |
1.417 |
1.417 |
1.474 |
1.456 |
1.468 |
1.391 |
1.478 |
1.427 |
1.470 |
1.405 |
1.461 |
| 2007 |
1.459 |
1.460 |
1.518 |
1.499 |
1.512 |
1.433 |
1.522 |
1.470 |
1.514 |
1.447 |
1.505 |
| 2008 |
1.503 |
1.504 |
1.564 |
1.544 |
1.557 |
1.476 |
1.568 |
1.514 |
1.559 |
1.491 |
1.550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009 |
1.548 |
1.549 |
1.610 |
1.591 |
1.604 |
1.520 |
1.615 |
1.559 |
1.606 |
1.535 |
1.597 |
| 2010 |
1.594 |
1.595 |
1.659 |
1.638 |
1.652 |
1.566 |
1.663 |
1.606 |
1.654 |
1.581 |
1.645 |
| 2011 |
1.642 |
1.643 |
1.708 |
1.688 |
1.702 |
1.613 |
1.713 |
1.654 |
1.704 |
1.629 |
1.694 |
| 2012 |
1.691 |
1.692 |
1.760 |
1.738 |
1.753 |
1.661 |
1.765 |
1.704 |
1.755 |
1.678 |
1.745 |
| 2013 |
1.742 |
1.743 |
1.813 |
1.790 |
1.805 |
1.711 |
1.818 |
1.755 |
1.807 |
1.728 |
1.797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2014 |
1.794 |
1.795 |
1.867 |
1.844 |
1.860 |
1.763 |
1.872 |
1.807 |
1.862 |
1.780 |
1.851 |
| 2015 |
1.848 |
1.849 |
1.923 |
1.899 |
1.915 |
1.816 |
1.928 |
1.862 |
1.917 |
1.833 |
1.907 |
| 2016 |
1.904 |
1.905 |
1.981 |
1.956 |
1.973 |
1.870 |
1.986 |
1.917 |
1.975 |
1.888 |
1.964 |
| 2017 |
1.961 |
1.962 |
2.040 |
2.015 |
2.032 |
1.926 |
2.046 |
1.975 |
2.034 |
1.945 |
2.023 |
| 2018 |
2.020 |
2.021 |
2.101 |
2.076 |
2.093 |
1.984 |
2.107 |
2.034 |
2.095 |
2.003 |
2.084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019 |
2.080 |
2.081 |
2.164 |
2.138 |
2.156 |
2.043 |
2.170 |
2.095 |
2.158 |
2.063 |
2.146 |
| 2020 |
2.143 |
2.144 |
2.229 |
2.202 |
2.221 |
2.105 |
2.235 |
2.158 |
2.223 |
2.125 |
2.211 |
| 2021 |
2.207 |
2.208 |
2.296 |
2.268 |
2.287 |
2.168 |
2.302 |
2.223 |
2.290 |
2.189 |
2.277 |
| 2022 |
2.273 |
2.274 |
2.365 |
2.336 |
2.356 |
2.233 |
2.371 |
2.290 |
2.358 |
2.255 |
2.345 |
| 2023 |
2.341 |
2.343 |
2.436 |
2.406 |
2.426 |
2.300 |
2.443 |
2.358 |
2.429 |
2.322 |
2.416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 |
2.412 |
2.413 |
2.509 |
2.478 |
2.499 |
2.369 |
2.516 |
2.429 |
2.502 |
2.392 |
2.488 |
| 2025 |
2.484 |
2.485 |
2.584 |
2.553 |
2.574 |
2.440 |
2.591 |
2.502 |
2.577 |
2.464 |
2.563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NOTE: 'SPECIAL' APPROPRIATIONS REFER TO PROGRAMS CLASSIFIED AS SECRET. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TABLE USE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WEIGHTED INDICES ARE USED TO CONVERT CONSTANT DOLLARS TO THEN-YEAR DOLLARS, AND VICE VERSA. |
|
| USE RAW INDICES TO CONVERT CONSTANT DOLLARS IN ONE YEAR TO CONSTANT DOLLARS IN ANOTHER YEAR. |
|
| WEIGHTED INDICES FOR EACH APPROPRIATION ARE BASED ON OUTLAY RATES FOR TOA EXCLUDING PAY AND |
|
| POL AND SHOULD BE USED ACCORDINGLY. FOR PAY AND POL, USE RAW INDICES. |
|
|
|
|
RFP ANNEX G-2
Baseline Funding Profile:
Projected For EELV Engineering & Manufacturing Development
The following profile represents the programmed funding for the EELV EMD module between
Fiscal Years 1998 and 2001. The profile does not include the funds budgeted and programmed
for the LCCV or Pre-EMD modules. It does, however, reflect the balance of funding projected
against the $2 billion EELV Development Program ceiling beyond Fiscal Year 2001. (Note:
The profile excludes funding for all non-contract costs funded by the Government program
office, e.g., program office program management, program office support.)
Programmed/Projected EMD Module Funding
(Then-Year $ Millions)
|
FY98 |
FY99 |
FY00 |
FY01 |
To
Complete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Baseline
Funding Profile |
$30 |
$160 |
$97 |
$100 |
$1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|