Program Element: 0603216C/0603217C Project Number: 3202
PE Title: Theater Missile Defense/Ballistic Missile Defense (U) Budget Activity: 03
Adv Technology Dev (U)
February 1994
A. (U) RESOURCES: ($ in Thousands)
Project Title: Operations Interface
FY1993 FY1994 FY1995 FY1996 FY1997 FY1998 FY1999 Total
Program Name: Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Program
0603216C RDT&E 0 0 2,522 2,522 2,522 2,522 2,522 Continuing
0603217C RDT&E 8,041 4,373 1,530 1,530 1,530 1,530 1,530 Continuing
B. (U) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF MISSION REQUIREMENTS AND SYSTEM CAPABILITIES:
(U) The mission of the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization is to manage, direct, and execute the
BMD Program to acquire and develop systems and architectures to (a) deploy theater missile defense
capability to protect forward-deployed armed forces of the U.S., friends, and allies; (b) develop
options for and deploy when directed, an antiballistic missile system that is capable of providing
highly effective defense of the U.S. homeland against limited attacks of ballistic missiles; and, (c)
demonstrate advanced technologies for near term insertion options and concept development of new
systems. This project supports the operational interfaces that must be provided to both the systems
acquisition community and the military operational community. For the acquisition community, this
project supports preparations for and execution of the Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) activities for
BMD systems. The project also provides analyses of acquisition policies, processes, and plans to
develop effective, streamlined means for acquiring BMD systems. On the military operations side,
analyses and simulations address systems effectiveness of proposed BMD system architectures against
ballistic missile threats to U.S. deployed forces, our Allies and friends. Analytical results are
used to support activities required for the Defense acquisition process. Theater and strategic gaming
with the CINCs is supported to identify roles, missions, and requirements for BMD. Funds are also
provided from this project to operational users to enable them to develop and refine their operational
requirements (ORDs) and concepts of operations (CONOPS) for employing BMD and ensuring that these
concepts are integrated into the overall BMD system deployment strategy and planning.
(U) This project is assigned to the Budget Activity and Program Element codes as identified in this
descriptive summary in accordance with existing Department of Defense policy. Further justification
of the Budget Activity code assigned to each Program Element is contained within the Brief Description
of Element section of each Program Element Summary.
C. (U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENT AND PLANS: Note that linear estimates were used for the following
financial information when exact data were not available.
(U) FY 1993 Accomplishments:
o ($1,161) Continued operational mission effectiveness analysis of BMD systems based on refined architecture and threat definition.
o ($925) Continued deterrence and third world mission analysis.
o ($2,123) Refined mission requirements for primary/alternate missions.
o ($1,300) Developed material acquisition document inputs.
o ($129) Conducted command center connectivity analysis.
o ($879) Updated offense-defense concept of operations.
o ($115) Supported tabletop CINC wargaming, including GLOBAL 93.
o ($1,079) Continued command and control analysis of operational requirements.
o ($80) Continued wargaming/strategic gaming/simulations/expert roundtables.
o ($250) Completed component cost and operational effectiveness analysis.
(U) FY 1994 Plans:
o ($400) Conduct Patriot PAC-3 Milestone IV DAB.
o ($50) Support Aegis Standard Missile Block IV-A DAB.
o ($50) Develop and analyze acquisition alternatives and impacts of the revised BMD program.
o ($884) Refine Operational Requirements Document (ORDs).
o ($1,097) Develop operational concept(s) of operations for BMD.
o ($332) Conduct theater and strategic wargaming, including GLOBAL 94.
o ($1,040) Conduct mission analysis for BMD.
(U) FY 1995 Plans:
o ($500) Support acquisition community interfaces.
o ($1,446) Refine Operational Requirements Document (ORDs).
o ($1,030) Develop operational concept(s) of operations for BMD.
o ($450) Conduct theater and strategic wargaming, including GLOBAL 95.
o ($626) Conduct mission analysis for BMD.
(U) Program Plan to Completion: This is a continuing program.
D. (U) WORK PERFORMED BY:
o SAIC, BDM, CEXEC, and Sparta - McLean, VA
o BDM, TASC - Rosslyn, VA
o Aries Analytics, SRS, TASC, Riverside Research Institute, Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc., DSA, ANSER, and General Research Corporation - Arlington, VA
o Rockwell International, TBE, ANSER - Colorado Springs, CO
o SPARTA, TBE - Huntsville, AL
o SAIC, SPARC - Omaha, NE
o NIPP - Fairfax, VA
o GAMA - Falls Church, VA
E. (U) COMPARISON WITH FY 1993 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY:
1. TECHNICAL CHANGES: Incorporated activities in 4108 and divested activities in 3201.
2. SCHEDULE CHANGES: None
3. COST CHANGES: None
F. (U) PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION:
G. (U) RELATED ACTIVITIES: Mission analysis is complementary to mission performance assessment
performed by Martin Marietta. There is no unnecessary duplication of effort within BMDO or the DoD.
H. (U) OTHER APPROPRIATION FUNDS: None
I. (U) INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS: None
J. (U) MILESTONE SCHEDULE:
o Support acquisition interfaces (As Required) FY93-98
o Assess systems military effectiveness (As Required) FY93-98
o Operational requirements development (Annually) FY93-98
o Wargames reports (As Required) FY93-98
o Command control analysis reports (Annually) FY93-98
o Offense-defense concepts of operations (Annually) FY93-98