COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1995 Actual	FY 1996 Estimate	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
	Total Program Element (PE) Cost	26,215	24,230	22,285	45,134	45,713	46,763	48,696	0	Continuing
4478	Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements	12,691	12,059	13,374	26,713	27,086	27,534	28,672	0	Continuing
4479	Attack Operations Concept Development	13,524	12,171	8,911	18,421	18,627	19,229	20,024	TBD	Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

Air Force Theater Missile Defense (TMD) is focused in three areas: Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) enhancements; Improvements to existing Attack Operations systems; and the development of the Airborne Laser. PE028060F is primarily concerned with C4I and Attack Operations as part of the Air Force focus in TMD, but also addresses some initial low-level studies and analysis for the Airborne Laser (ABL) technology program. AF TMD concentrates on defining improvements to existing operational capabilities, developing and evaluating prototypes, demonstrating as well as simulating modifications during operational concept demonstrations, and coordinating the transition of these capabilities to operational systems. C4I improvements contribute greatly to the overall effectiveness of TMD systems developed by each of the Services and the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (Patriot, THAAD, etc.). C4I enhancements improve our ability to assess, target, plan and task attackers to counter Theater Missile (TM) threats. The C4I program encompasses JTIDS TMD Upgrades (including, for example, TMD Message Set Integration and JTIDS Range Extension), Distributed Battle Management, Operations Decision Tools (Time Critical Target Aid (TCTA), Defensive Planning Module (DPM), Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA), and Active Defense Decision Aid (ADDA)), Intel Support Systems (Intel Support Concept and Real Time Intel Tools) and integration of these systems within the Air Force and among the Services. Attack Operations focuses on improving the ability to locate, identify, target and destroy theater missiles and supporting infrastructure on the ground. Attack Operations is concerned with the theater missile threat from production through deployment, prior to and during launch, as well as soon after launch before critical mobile targets are able to egress to hide locations. The foundation for Attack Operations is improved C4I and automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) upgrades to one or more airborne platforms (Joint STARS, F-15E, Rivet Joint, U-2). The Air Force program is based upon taking our defense against the growing theater missile threat to the enemy by making near-term modifications to existing theater assets. The TMD program is concerned with improving existing operational capability, evaluating and demonstrating prototypes, as well as simulating modifications during operational concept demonstrations.

(U) Acquisition Strategy: HQ ASC will provide the program management for the concept exploration of TMD Attack Operations. ASC will conduct lab demonstrations with Wright Labs and support CONOPS development and requirements definition by analyzing and demonstrating measures of effectiveness for various sensor improvements and cueing schemes. HQ ESC will provide program management for the concept exploration of C4I enhancements. Prototypes and analysis of improvements to existing C4I assets will compliment the Attack Operations effort with combined participation in Operational Concept Demonstrations. These Attack Operations and BMC4I analyses and demonstrations are specifically targeted against operational deficiencies identified in the TMD Mission Area Plan (MAP), are traceable to the AF and JROC Mission Need Statement (MNS) and are consistent with the ACC TMD Concept of Operations (CONOPS). Integration of TMD requirements and fielding of proposed material solutions will continue beyond concept exploration in the appropriate program element for a particular system. For example, the TMD demonstration and requirements analysis for Joint STARS ATR may transition into a Joint STARS P3I effort within the Joint STARS program element. Existing contracts will be used for those systems where engineering change proposals are appropriate. Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis (SETA) contracts will be used to support the requirements definition phase of TMD improvements. In those areas where new materiel solutions are necessary to correct a deficiency, the source selection process will be followed to establish a new contract.

*FY94 TMD tasks were funded in PE27411F and PE63617F.

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	Total Cost
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget	26434	25102	22986	TBD
(U) Appropriated Value	27302	25102		TBD
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional General Reductions	-298	-680
b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)	-570
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming	-219
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1996 PB		-192	-701
(U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1997 President's Budget	26215	24230	22285

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY97 funding reduced due to administrative adjustment to Air Force programs (-114) and revised inflation (-587).

Schedule: No impact to milestones.

Technical: N/A

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A

(U) D. Schedule Profile

FY 1995

FY 1996

FY 1997

	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4
(U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance)									Srv	F15
(U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototype									(1)	(3)
(U) Intel Support Systems: ISC updates; Syria, Iran, and Iraq, and automation of country studies				X				X				X
(U) TMD TACS systems requirements (JTIDS message upgrades; decision aids)								X
(U) Ops Concept Demonstrations							X				X

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1995 Actual	FY 1996 Estimate	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4478	Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements	12,691	12,059	13,374	26,713	27,086	27,534	28,672	0	Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

C4I enhancements are needed to reduce the battle management and command & control timelines associated with the theater missile threat. The C4I program includes:

1) Operations and maintenance of the Tactical Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF);

2) Procurement of four MCE/TPS-75 with expert missile tracker (EMT) capability;

3) Intel Support Systems which include the development and revision of the Intel Support Concept (ISC), automation of the country studies, and development of the Real Time Intel Tool for TMD IPB;

4) JTIDS TMD Upgrades which are the development and integration of TMD messages into JTIDS host platforms and the extension of JTIDS beyond line of sight;

5) Operations Decision Support Tools which include the integration of the Time Critical Target Aid into TBM Core Systems (TBMCS) architecture, the development and migration of the Defensive Planning Module into TBMCS, and initiating the development of the Attack Operations and Active Defense Decision Aids.

6) Distributed Battle Management (Airborne DBM prototype) concept, which enhances the forward execution capabilities of the TACS to counter the short timeline of time critical targets. This includes the development, integration and test of the DBM capability on an airborne platform. The program will leverage off the capabilities of the current ground Combat Integration Capability (CIC) program which integrates and fuses various intelligence and surveillance feeds to provide the CINCs with an effective battle management capability.

(U) FY 1995 ($ in Thousands):

(U) 5500	Supported Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF) operations for C4I simulation and analysis
(U) 6600	Continued missile tracker software upgrade and integration for the MCE/TPS-75
(U) 591	Intel Support Systems - Drafted Intelligence Support Concept (ISC); completed Iran and started Iraq country study for IPB
(U) 12691	Total

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) 5200	Continue support for Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF) operations for C4I simulation and analysis
(U) 3709	Continue missile tracker prototype acquisition for MCE/TPS-75
(U) 650	Intel Support Systems--Develop processes and tools for automatic production of digitized TMD Intel Prep of the Battlefield (IPB) information.
(U) 2500	TMD JTIDS message integration into CRC, Rivet Joint, and Cobra Ball; JTIDS Range Extension implementation; Development of TCTA and DPM and begin design for TBMCS integration; start DBM analysis and design.
(U) 12059	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) 5884	Complete TACCSF operations support for C4I simulation and analysis
(U) 3300	Complete MCE/TPS-75 missile tracker capability with final delivery.
(U) 1950	Intel Support Systems - Update ISC; Continue tool development for automatic production of digitized TMD IPB information.
(U) 2240	TMD JTIDS message integration into JSTARS and AOC; Begin JTIDS Range Extension development; Complete development of TCTA and DPM and integrate in TBMCS; continue DBM analysis/design and start simulation.
(U) 13374	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	Total Cost
(U) Previous President's Budget	12691	12590	13690	TBD
(U) Appropriated Value	12691	12590		TBD
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional General Reductions	0	-435
b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)	0
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram		-96
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1996 PB			-316
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget	12691	12059	13374

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY97 funding reduced due to revised inflation.

Schedule: No impact to milestones.

Technical: N/A

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A

(U) D. Schedule Profile: See page 3.

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($0 in Thousands)

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997
(U) TACCSF	5500	5200	5884
(U) Intelligence Support Systems	591	650	1950
(U) MCE/TPS-75 Missile Tracking System	6600	3709	3300
(U) JTIDS TMD Upgrades & Ops Decision Tools	0	2500	2240
(U) Total	12691	12059	13374

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($0 in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1995

Budget FY 1995

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Martin Marietta	FFP	Oct 95		ACCDRA	4300	4800	4700	5478	TBD	TBD
Westinghouse	FFP	Oct 95		ESC/AVT		4600	2069	2750	TBD	TBD
Zeltech	T&M	Dec 95		ACC/INX	250	250	250	250	TBD	TBD
Logicon	T&M	Mar 96		ESC/XRS		0	500	500	TBD	TBD
E-Systems	T&M	Mar 96		ESC/XRS		0	631	615	TBD	TBD
Alphatech	T&M	Mar 96		ESC/XRS		0	500	500	TBD	TBD
NAIC	T&M	Feb 96		ESC/XRS		0	479	400	TBD	TBD
Motorola	T&M	Nov 97		ESC/XRS		0	500	500	TBD	TBD

Support and Management Organizations

FFRDC					840	765	1395	1331	TBD	TBD
Non-FFRDC					1200	735	1035	1050	TBD	TBD
HQ ESC					710	1541	0	0	0	2251

Test and Evaluation Organizations

TBD

	COST ($ In Thousands)	FY 1995 Actual	FY 1996 Estimate	FY 1997 Estimate	FY 1998 Estimate	FY 1999 Estimate	FY 2000 Estimate	FY 2001 Estimate	Cost to Complete	Total Cost
4479	Attack Operations Concept Development	13,524	12,171	8,911	18,421	18,627	19,229	20,024	TBD	Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

Improvements in Attack Operations are based on the ability to locate, identify, and destroy theater missiles and associated infrastructure on the ground. In addition to the enhancements to C4I, Attack Operations project focuses on sensor capabilities and CONOPS and requirements development for TMD offensive counter-air and optimized integration with defensive systems. Automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) upgrades to Joint STARS, F-15E, and potentially U-2, F-16 and UAVs are analyzed in demonstrations and simulation during Operational Concept Demonstrations and CINC experiments. A cost and operational effectiveness analysis of the Airborne Laser will be conducted in FY96, and its contribution to post-launch attack operations will be considered. The optimum set of sensor improvements will be proposed as P3I upgrades within existing program elements.

(U) FY 1995 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $4800	Conducted prototype development of surveillance ATR.
(U) $2598	Conducted Operational Concept Demonstrations with Roving Sands exercise.
(U) $3171	Continued analysis of Attack Operations Sensor improvements.
(U) $2955	Conducted prototype development of F-15E ATC/R demonstration.
(U) $13524	Total

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $500	Prototype analysis of surveillance ATR demonstration.
(U) $900	Conduct Operational Concept Demonstration with participation in CINC experiments.
(U) $2604	Continue requirements definition and analysis of sensor prototypes and Attack Operations improvements
(U) $3282	Conduct definition studies and analysis on Airborne Laser
(U) $4885	F-15E ATC/R demonstration.
(U) $12171	Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $1190	Conduct demonstration of surveillance ATR prototype.
(U) $3511	Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration.
(U) $2010	Continue Analysis of Sensor prototypes and Attack Operations demonstrations/simulations.
(U) $2200	Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype.
(U) $8911	Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997	Total Cost
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget	13524	12512	9182	TBD
(U) Appropriated Value	13524	12512		TBD
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Congressional General Reductions		-245
b. SBIR
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram		-96
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1996 PB			-271
(U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1997 President's Budget	13524	12171	8911

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY97 funding reduced due to revised inflation.

Schedule: No impact to milestones.

Technical: N/A

(U) D. Schedule Profile: See page 3.

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

	FY 1995	FY 1996	FY 1997
(U) Definition Studies/Analysis Airborne Laser	0	3282	0
(U) Joint STARS ATR Demonstration	4800	500	1190
(U) Operational Concept Demonstration	2598	900	3511
(U) Sensor Applications	3171	2604	2010
(U) F-15 ATR Demonstrations	2955	4885	2200
(U) Total	13524	12171	8911

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office EAC

Total Prior to FY 1995

Budget FY 1995

Budget FY 1996

Budget FY 1997

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

Boeing	F3361594 C1436	Aug 94		HQ/ASC	391	781	0	0	TBD	TBD
Hughes	F3361594D14000004	Aug 94		HQ/ASC	500	484	2772	700	TBD	TBD
Geometric	F3361594C1441	Mar 95		HQ/ASC	0	65	0	0	TBD	TBD
Hughes-FD	F3361594D1420000004	Mar 95		HQ/ASC	0	750	2200	0	TBD	TBD
Norden	F3361592C1045	Sep 94		HQ/ASC	490	50	0	0	TBD	TBD
Veda	F3361594D14000006	Feb 95		HQ/ASC	0	200	400	0	TBD	TBD
Lincoln Lab	AF FM 616	Mar 95		HQ/ASC	0	100	0	0	TBD	TBD
Sverdrup	F3361594C1425	Mar 95		HQ/ASC	0	556	35	0	TBD	TBD
HSC/AL	AF FM 616	Aug 94		HQ/ASC	975	1495	715	985	TBD	TBD
Sandia Nat Labs	MIPR	Mar 95		HQ/ASC	3786	4800	500	1190	TBD	TBD
Lockheed Martin	AF FM 616	TBD		HQ/ASC	0	0	0	1518	TBD	TBD

Support and Management Organizations

FFRDC				HQ/ASC	400	357	82	648	TBD	TBD
Non-FFRDC				HQ/ASC	191	280	0	355	TBD	TBD
HQ ASC					0	561	4332	2515	TBD	TBD

Test and Evaluation Organizations

28 Test/TXT		Mar 95		HQ/ACC	16	0	900	0	TBD	TBD
AFSAA	AF FM 616	Feb 95		HQ/ACC	0	350	85	0	TBD	TBD
Eglin-46 Test Wing		May 94		HQ/ASC	2051	3245	150	1000	TBD	TBD