| COST (In Thousands) | FY 1995 Actual | FY 1996 Estimate | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | |
| Total Program Element (PE) Cost | 2,653 | 954 | 26,786 | 10,997 | 11,115 | 11,142 | 11,251 | Continuing | Continuing | |
| 4190 | Treaty Prep/Verification Support | 0 | 468 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 508 |
| 4283 | Open Skies Treaty Systems Develop | 2,653 | 486 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,749 |
| 4520 | Comp Test Ban Treaty Data Ctr Dev | 0 | 0 | 26,786 | 10,997 | 11,115 | 11,142 | 11,251 | Continuing | Continuing |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
(U)This element directly supports implementation and planning for current and pending arms control agreements.
(U) Treaty preparation/verification support activities encompass a wide range of projects necessary to prepare the United States for compliance with impending and future arms control treaties and negotiations.
(U) Open Skies support includes development of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), SAR media processing equipment, the Data Annotation and Recording Mapping System (DARMS), as well as systems integration, engineering, test, and evaluation. This includes:
- (U) Aircraft systems integration, engineering, test, and evaluation
- (U) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) prototype development
- (U) Data Annotation and Recording Mapping System (DARMS) prototype development
- (U) Ground processing software development.
(U) Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) Data Center Development and related CTBT technology development programs transfer from the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) to AF Arms Control in FY97. Work on seismic event identification techniques performed by Phillips Laboratory (Project 1010) and research on seismology in support of nuclear monitoring performed under the auspices of the AF Office of Scientific Research (Project 2309) were also transformed to AF Arms Control in FY97. These actions were taken to consolidate DoD funding and management of key treaty implementation activities and monitoring technologies into one program element.
(U) PE belongs in BA # 7 since projects involve efforts that include modifications to operational systems, and production approval for all R&D activities have been approved.
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Total Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 6,456 | 998 | 1,728 | Continuing |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 3,456 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Congressional General Reductions | -38 | -20 | ||
| b. SBIR | -72 | -16 | ||
| c. Omnibus and Above Threshold | -8 | |||
| d. BTR | -693 | |||
| (U) Functional transfer from ARPA and Air Force science and technology programs | +25,058 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 2,653 | 954 | 26,786 | Continuing |
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | Cost To Compl | Total Cost | |
| (U) Aircraft Procurement: C-135B | 0 | 429 | 548 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61,577 |
| (U) Other Procurement: Items less than $2.0 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 46 | Con't. | Cont. |
| (U) Other Procurement: Items Less that $2.0 | 2,441 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,441 |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| (U) See individual project schedules |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
(U) Treaty preparation/verification support activities encompass a wide range of projects necessary to prepare the United States for compliance with impending arms control treaties and negotiations. They include modifications and enhancements to the Arms Control Treaty Information Operating Network (ACTION) system, research and analysis activities associated with preparing the USAF to support immediate compliance with existing agreements and analysis of the implications of future agreements and negotiations.
(U) FY 1995
| (U) $0 | Not Applicable. |
| (U) $0 | Total |
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $468 | Accomplishes research to model threats and analyze feasibility of AF's National Missile Defense strategy. Analyzes compliance with ABM treaty. |
| (U) $468 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $0 | Follow-on requirements not defined and programmed beyond FY96. |
| (U) $0 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 2,760 | 498 | 1,728 | TBD |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 0 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Congressional General Reduction | -10 | |||
| b. SBIR | -16 | |||
| c. Omnibus and Above Threshold | -4 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY95 PB | -1,728 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 0 | 468 | 0 | 508 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
(U) Funding: General Congressional reduction. Decreased funding due to reduction in treaty preparation activities associated with the START II, CWC and CTBT. Follow-on efforts not yet defined and programmed beyond FY96.
Schedule: Not Applicable
Technical: Not Applicable
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): Not Applicable
(U) D. Schedule Profile:
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) Analysis and Support | X | X |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
(U) Open Skies support includes development of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), SAR media processing equipment, the Data Annotation and Recording Mapping System (DARMS), as well as systems integration, engineering, test, and evaluation. This includes:
- (U) Aircraft systems integration, engineering, test, and evaluation
- (U) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) prototype development
- (U) Data Annotation and Recording Mapping System (DARMS) prototype development
- (U) Ground processing software development
(U) FY 1995
| (U) $2,153 | Continued the aircraft systems integration, engineering, test, and evaluation for the Open Skies OC-135B aircraft. |
| (U) $500 | Provided for the software development associated with processing SAR and video magnetic media. |
| (U) $(72) | SBIR reduction not reflected in database |
| (U) $(693) | Reprogramming not reflected in database |
| (U) $2,653 | Total |
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $486 | Completes system integration and test & evaluation of the FOC trainer OC-135B aircraft. |
| (U) $486 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $0 | Project complete after FY96. |
| (U) $0 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 3,696 | 500 | 8,696 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 3,456 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Congressional General Reductions | -38 | -10 | ||
| b. SBIR | -72 | |||
| c. Omnibus and Above Threshold | -4 | |||
| d. BTR | -693 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 2,653 | 486 | 0 | 8,070 |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
(U) Funding: Increased funding due to added costs associated with overall aircraft systems integration. General Congressional reduction in FY95. FY95 SBIR reduction and reprogramming action are not reflected in the database.
Schedule: Not Applicable
Technical: Not Applicable
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | To
Compl |
Total
Cost | |
| (U) Aircraft Procurement: C-135B | 0 | 429 | 548 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61,577 |
| (U) Other Procurement: Items less than $2.0 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 46 | Con't | TBD |
| (U) Other Procurement: Items Less that $2.0 | 2,441 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,441 |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| Includes all Program activities not just RDT&E | FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) Milestone II/III (Complete Mar 93) | ||||||||||||
| (U) Critical Design Complete (3010) | ||||||||||||
| (U) FOC Aircraft #1 | ||||||||||||
| (U) Modifications (3010) | X | |||||||||||
| (U) T&E (3600) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Delivery | X | |||||||||||
| (U) FOC Aircraft #2 | ||||||||||||
| (U) Modifications (3010) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) T&E (3600) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Delivery | X | |||||||||||
| (U) FOC Retrofit of IOC Aircraft | ||||||||||||
| (U) Modifications (3010) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) T&E (3600) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Delivery | X | |||||||||||
| (U) Ground Proc'ng Facility Enhancements (3600) | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Engine Stage III Noise Abatement | ||||||||||||
| (U) Hush Kit Devel. & Procurement (3010) | X | |||||||||||
| (U) Install Kits (1/98 - 4/99) (3010) |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
(U) The CTBT effort will encompass a multitude of activities in FY97 that enable the DoD to prepare for US treaty implementation and compliance. Prior to FY97, these activities were managed by AFTAC, ARPA, Phillips Labs, and the Office of Scientific Research. Activities include:
(U) Development of National and International Data Centers ($16.3 million)
- (U) automated systems development and integration
- (U) automated signal processing and integration into operational system
- (U) expansion from seismic-only processing to include hydroacoustic, infrasound, and radionuclide data
- (U) complete integration of automated and interactive processing algorithms
- (U) demonstrate atmospheric transport capability for radionuclide location
- (U) prototype multi-technique data fusion and correlation system
- (U) data authentication
- (U) conclude testing of the integrated system
- (U) initiation of transition of the IDC to CTBT Organization/Preparatory Commission
- (U) automation integration of knowledge bases, multi-source cueing, and regional discrimination research
- (U) display development of man-machine interface
(U) Treaty Implementation and Technical Support ($4.593 million)
- (U) definition of processes and techniques for treaty required data exchanges and notifications
- (U) compliance and verification decision tools
- (U) interface to other National Systems
- (U) interface to the US research community
- (U) support to Preparatory Commission activities
- (U) provide capability to analyze, characterize and resolve events located in the US in order to minimize frivolous on-site inspection requests by foreign governments and the CTBT international organization
(U) Research and development of nuclear monitoring techniques ($5.893 million)
- (U) Seismic
(U) seismic and hydroacoustic array development
(U) event detection techniques
(U) location and discrimination of small events
(U) deliver model of Eurasion and Middle East crust & mantle structure
(U) calibration of standard networks
- (U) Radionuclide
(U) development and testing of radionuclide detection techniques
(U) configure existing radionuclide data processing software to the UNIX platform
- (U) Xenon
transition DOE xenon sampler prototype to production ready model
(U) Prior to FY97, ARPA, Phillips Labs, and OSR managed these activities under the following PEs:
(U) ARPA PE 0602301E, Project ST-23
(U) OSR PE 0601102F, Project 2309
(U) Phillips Labs PE 0602601F, Project 1010
(U) FY 1995
| (U) $0 | N/A |
| (U) $0 | Total |
(U) FY 1996
| (U) $0 | N/A |
| (U) $0 | Total |
(U) FY 1997
| (U) $26,786 | Multiple |
| (U) $26,786 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 0 | |||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Reprogramming | +26,786 | Continuing | ||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 0 | 0 | 26,786 | Continuing |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
(U) Funding: Transfers funding from ARPA, Phillips Labs, and OSR for implementation preparation and key monitoring activities.
Schedule: Not Applicable
Technical: Not Applicable
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands):
(U) Related Activities:
(U) PE 03XXXXXXF, Forest Green
(U) D. Schedule Profile
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| (U) Prototype IDC Development | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) NDC Development | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Monitoring Technologies Development | X | X | ||||||||||
| (U) Treaty Implementation & Technical Support | X | X |