| COST ($ In Thousands) | FY 1995 Actual | FY 1996 Estimate | FY 1997 Estimate | FY 1998 Estimate | FY 1999 Estimate | FY 2000 Estimate | FY 2001 Estimate | Cost to Complete | Total Cost | |
| 3361 | Mission & System Planning | 5,911 | 6,495 | 6,531 | 6,673 | 6,832 | 7,010 | 7,176 | Continuing | TBD |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
This Program Element is the only dedicated source of funds for Air Force Mission and Functional Area Teams (MATs & FATs) to perform the studies and analyses that support the Modernization Planning Process. The Air Force, through the Modernization Planning Process, is in compliance with the DoD 5000 series regulations and JCS MOP 77 which mandate that a full range of requirements analyses be continuously conducted to identify and substantiate current operational deficiencies, to identify technology needs and exploit technology opportunities, and when necessary to define the requirements for materiel solutions. First, a Mission Area Assessment (MAA) is conducted to identify tasks and substantiate operational deficiencies. These deficiencies must relate directly to assigned Air Force operational roles, missions, and supporting tasks that cannot be performed efficiently or in a cost effective manner. Second, a Mission Needs Analysis (MNA) is conducted to identify potential cost effective, non-materiel and materiel alternatives that address the deficiency, or present new technological opportunities. Non-materiel alternatives include doctrine, tactics, training, and organizational changes. Materiel alternatives include modifications to existing systems; procurement of existing DoD, Allied and non-developmental systems; or the development of new systems. Operational requirements analyses and supporting acquisition milestone documentation include MAAs, MNAs, and Mission Need Statements (MNS). Phase 0 concepts studies and Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analyses (COEAs) are not normally conducted in this program element. The major commands and Air Staff functional agencies annually propose studies for the upcoming fiscal year. An Air Force board prioritizes the proposals using a rigorous Analytical Hierarchy Process. Proposals may be modified or delayed to accommodate programmed funding. The highest priority proposals are listed in this descriptive summary and a detailed description is provided to the Congressional Appropriations committees for approval to receive funding. This process eliminates duplication of effort within the Air Force or DoD. This program is in budget activity 6 - Management Support because the results of the studies and analyses performed have a substantial impact on future Air Force warfighting capability as an input to technology, acquisition (prior to Milestone 0), and procurement investment decisions.
(U) FY 1995 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $992 | Continued development of Integrated Definition for Functional (IDEF) Modeling analysis of merged Air Mobility command and control processes - identified mission area deficiencies and alternative solutions. |
| (U) $789 | Completed MNA to identify options for hostile target identification. Selected options to transition into existing programs. |
| (U) $395 | Completed MNA for systems for destruction of non-emitting surface-to-air targets and investigation of alternatives for incorporation into existing aircraft and munitions programs |
| (U) $948 | Completed MNA efforts for theater missile defense concepts. |
| (U) $158 | Completed Mission Area Assessment/Mission Needs Analysis (MAA/MNA) of C4I architectures for Theater Battle Management. |
| (U) $789 | Continued surveillance and reconnaissance MNA to identify architecture alternatives to support the battlefield commander. |
| (U) $533 | Initiated Integrated Definition for Functional (IDEF) MAA of intelligence systems. |
| (U) $680 | Initiated IDEF MAA of combat weather requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions. |
| (U) $309 | Initiated Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command Mission Area Plans (MAPs). |
| (U) $213 | Initiated tool definition for education and training MAAs to include student throughput, technological advances, and force structure changes. |
| (U) $105 | Initiated MNA for next generation bare base operations. |
| (U) $5,911 | Total |
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $732 | Initiate MAP analysis support to Counterair, Strategic Attack/Interdiction, Theater Missile Defense, and Close Air Support MAPs. |
| (U) $968 | Continue surveillance and reconnaissance mission area study to identify architecture alternatives to support the battlefield commander. |
| (U) $664 | Initiate Standard Data Base Architecture study to identify and recommend a solution to C4I architecture and database deficiencies stated in the Air Force Special Operations Command MAPs, the Air Force Intelligence Functional Area Plan (FAP), the Air Force C4 FAP, and the Air Force Surveillance and Reconnaissance MAP. |
| (U) $385 | Continue Air Education and Training Command mission areas throughput and resource allocation model development. |
| (U) $722 | Continue Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command MAPs. |
| (U) $462 | Initiate effort to adapt existing air mobility modeling and simulation tools to distributed interactive simulation (DIS) standards to support air mobility MAAs. |
| (U) $395 | Initiate a study to determine modeling and simulation (M&S) requirements for Special Operations Forces missions and produce a list of existing M&S tools that can be used as is or modified, or recommend other alternatives as required. |
| (U) $1,078 | Complete MAA/MNA of Air Mobility CommandÕs missions to identify requirements for a single, integrated command and control system. |
| (U) $241 | Initiate studies on health and safety issues of non-lethal weapons to support Air Force Surgeon General functional area analysis and assessment. |
| (U) $626 | Continue IDEF MAA/MNA of combat weather support requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions. |
| (U) $222 | Initiate study to support MNA for the Special Operations Forces Provide Mobility in Denied Territory mission area. |
| (U) $6,495 | Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
| (U) $1,020 | Initiate studies of SOF aircraft mission vulnerabilities and potential countermeasures. |
| (U) $1,600 | Continue/initiate efforts in support of Air Combat Command mission areas. |
| (U) $680 | Continue throughput and resource allocation studies in support of Air Education and Training Command mission areas. |
| (U) $730 | Complete Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command MAPs. |
| (U) $466 | Continue effort to adapt existing air mobility modeling and simulation tools to DIS standards to support air mobility MAAs. |
| (U) $875 | Initiate efforts in support of Air Mobility MNAs and requirements definition. |
| (U) $580 | Initiate efforts in support of the Air Force Medical Functional Area. |
| (U) $580 | Continue IDEF MAA/MNA of combat weather support requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions. |
| (U) $6,531 | Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
| FY 1995 | FY 1996 | FY 1997 | Total
Cost | |
| (U) Previous President's Budget | 5,870 | 6,745 | 6,764 | Continuing |
| (U) Appropriated Value | 7,500 | 6,745 | ||
| (U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value | ||||
| a. Cong Gen Reductions | -1,589 | -198 | ||
| b. SBIR | ||||
| c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram | -52 | |||
| d. Below Threshold Reprogramming | ||||
| (U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1996 PB | -233 | |||
| (U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget | 5,911 | 6,495 | 6,531 | Continuing |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: Funding is reduced in FY97 to support higher priority efforts and for revised economic assumptions.
Schedule: Not Applicable
Technical: Not Applicable
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)
Not Applicable
(U) D. Schedule Profile
Not Applicable