COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1995 Actual FY 1996 Estimate FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost
3361 Mission & System Planning 5,911 6,495 6,531 6,673 6,832 7,010 7,176 Continuing TBD

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This Program Element is the only dedicated source of funds for Air Force Mission and Functional Area Teams (MATs & FATs) to perform the studies and analyses that support the Modernization Planning Process. The Air Force, through the Modernization Planning Process, is in compliance with the DoD 5000 series regulations and JCS MOP 77 which mandate that a full range of requirements analyses be continuously conducted to identify and substantiate current operational deficiencies, to identify technology needs and exploit technology opportunities, and when necessary to define the requirements for materiel solutions. First, a Mission Area Assessment (MAA) is conducted to identify tasks and substantiate operational deficiencies. These deficiencies must relate directly to assigned Air Force operational roles, missions, and supporting tasks that cannot be performed efficiently or in a cost effective manner. Second, a Mission Needs Analysis (MNA) is conducted to identify potential cost effective, non-materiel and materiel alternatives that address the deficiency, or present new technological opportunities. Non-materiel alternatives include doctrine, tactics, training, and organizational changes. Materiel alternatives include modifications to existing systems; procurement of existing DoD, Allied and non-developmental systems; or the development of new systems. Operational requirements analyses and supporting acquisition milestone documentation include MAAs, MNAs, and Mission Need Statements (MNS). Phase 0 concepts studies and Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analyses (COEAs) are not normally conducted in this program element. The major commands and Air Staff functional agencies annually propose studies for the upcoming fiscal year. An Air Force board prioritizes the proposals using a rigorous Analytical Hierarchy Process. Proposals may be modified or delayed to accommodate programmed funding. The highest priority proposals are listed in this descriptive summary and a detailed description is provided to the Congressional Appropriations committees for approval to receive funding. This process eliminates duplication of effort within the Air Force or DoD. This program is in budget activity 6 - Management Support because the results of the studies and analyses performed have a substantial impact on future Air Force warfighting capability as an input to technology, acquisition (prior to Milestone 0), and procurement investment decisions.

(U) FY 1995 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $992 Continued development of Integrated Definition for Functional (IDEF) Modeling analysis of merged Air Mobility command and control processes - identified mission area deficiencies and alternative solutions.
(U) $789 Completed MNA to identify options for hostile target identification. Selected options to transition into existing programs.
(U) $395 Completed MNA for systems for destruction of non-emitting surface-to-air targets and investigation of alternatives for incorporation into existing aircraft and munitions programs
(U) $948 Completed MNA efforts for theater missile defense concepts.
(U) $158 Completed Mission Area Assessment/Mission Needs Analysis (MAA/MNA) of C4I architectures for Theater Battle Management.
(U) $789 Continued surveillance and reconnaissance MNA to identify architecture alternatives to support the battlefield commander.
(U) $533 Initiated Integrated Definition for Functional (IDEF) MAA of intelligence systems.
(U) $680 Initiated IDEF MAA of combat weather requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions.
(U) $309 Initiated Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command Mission Area Plans (MAPs).
(U) $213 Initiated tool definition for education and training MAAs to include student throughput, technological advances, and force structure changes.
(U) $105 Initiated MNA for next generation bare base operations.
(U) $5,911 Total

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $732 Initiate MAP analysis support to Counterair, Strategic Attack/Interdiction, Theater Missile Defense, and Close Air Support MAPs.
(U) $968 Continue surveillance and reconnaissance mission area study to identify architecture alternatives to support the battlefield commander.
(U) $664 Initiate Standard Data Base Architecture study to identify and recommend a solution to C4I architecture and database deficiencies stated in the Air Force Special Operations Command MAPs, the Air Force Intelligence Functional Area Plan (FAP), the Air Force C4 FAP, and the Air Force Surveillance and Reconnaissance MAP.
(U) $385 Continue Air Education and Training Command mission areas throughput and resource allocation model development.
(U) $722 Continue Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command MAPs.
(U) $462 Initiate effort to adapt existing air mobility modeling and simulation tools to distributed interactive simulation (DIS) standards to support air mobility MAAs.
(U) $395 Initiate a study to determine modeling and simulation (M&S) requirements for Special Operations Forces missions and produce a list of existing M&S tools that can be used as is or modified, or recommend other alternatives as required.
(U) $1,078 Complete MAA/MNA of Air Mobility CommandÕs missions to identify requirements for a single, integrated command and control system.
(U) $241 Initiate studies on health and safety issues of non-lethal weapons to support Air Force Surgeon General functional area analysis and assessment.
(U) $626 Continue IDEF MAA/MNA of combat weather support requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions.
(U) $222 Initiate study to support MNA for the Special Operations Forces Provide Mobility in Denied Territory mission area.
(U) $6,495 Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

(U) $1,020 Initiate studies of SOF aircraft mission vulnerabilities and potential countermeasures.
(U) $1,600 Continue/initiate efforts in support of Air Combat Command mission areas.
(U) $680 Continue throughput and resource allocation studies in support of Air Education and Training Command mission areas.
(U) $730 Complete Future Space Architectures (FSA) studies to support development of Air Force Space Command MAPs.
(U) $466 Continue effort to adapt existing air mobility modeling and simulation tools to DIS standards to support air mobility MAAs.
(U) $875 Initiate efforts in support of Air Mobility MNAs and requirements definition.
(U) $580 Initiate efforts in support of the Air Force Medical Functional Area.
(U) $580 Continue IDEF MAA/MNA of combat weather support requirements for worldwide Air Force and Army missions.
(U) $6,531 Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 Total

Cost

(U) Previous President's Budget 5,870 6,745 6,764 Continuing
(U) Appropriated Value 7,500 6,745
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value
a. Cong Gen Reductions -1,589 -198
b. SBIR
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram -52
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1996 PB -233
(U) Current Budget Submit/President's Budget 5,911 6,495 6,531 Continuing

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: Funding is reduced in FY97 to support higher priority efforts and for revised economic assumptions.

Schedule: Not Applicable

Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands)

Not Applicable

(U) D. Schedule Profile

Not Applicable