(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

FY 1995 ACTUAL	FY 1996 ESTIMATE	FY 1997 ESTIMATE	FY 1998 ESTIMATE	FY 1999 ESTIMATE	FY 2000 ESTIMATE	FY 2001 ESTIMATE	TO COMPLETE	TOTAL PROGRAM
PROJECT NUMBER & TITLE
R2145 Cruise Missile Defense
36,665	48,525	46,311	31,559	12,334	0	0	0	214,352
R2266 Mobile Offshore Base
0	13,893	9,249	4,610	0	0	0	0	27,752
TOTAL	36,665	62,418	55,560	36,169	12,334	0	0	0	242,104

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program focuses science and technology resources in the areas of Precision Strike and Air Superiority/Defense in support of the Joint Chiefs of Staff's (JCS's) top five Joint Warfighting Capabilities and the following Joint Mission Areas (JMAs): Joint Strike, Joint Littoral Warfare, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence and Strategic Sealift/Protection.

(U) The Global Surveillance and Communications area, transferred to Program Element (PE) 0603794N for FY 1995, developed and demonstrated the capability to provide the tactical user with theater of operations, near-real-time precision targeting information, sensor-to-shooter target updating, and Battle Damage Assessment generated from multiple existing high-altitude resources supporting all the referenced Joint Mission Areas with primary applicability to Joint Surveillance and Joint Littoral Warfare Mission Areas.

(U) Precision Strike integrates surveillance and targeting capabilities developed in the Global Surveillance area with high-speed processing and precision weapons for rapid response against high-value, short-dwell targets over extended ranges. The Navy Tactical Missile System provided a demonstration launch of a Navy variant of the Army Tactical Missile System from a ship in support of the Navy's Surface Fire Support mission.

(U) The Air Superiority and Defense area develops and demonstrates all-weather, day/night engagement capabilities against manned aircraft, cruise missiles (including supersonic sea-skimmers), helicopters and tactical ballistic missiles that will be employing stealth and countermeasures. The Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) Advanced Technology effort includes: 1) an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD), Phase I, which demonstrates that an AEGIS ship (or other surface based missile launch platform) using one or more surrogate airborne sensor partners can provide greatly expanded air defense capabilities leading to a robust capability against overland cruise missiles beyond surface based radar line-of-sight; 2) and a CMD Phase II that accelerates and aligns E-2C Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs toward a fielded CMD capability and balances performance, cost, schedule and risk across multiple technology programs; and initiates advanced missile technology efforts to develop and demonstrate engagement capabilities against next generation overland cruise missiles. The Airship Demonstration assesses the potential contribution that airships could make to the airborne component of the ship self defense/cooperative engagement capability, over-the-horizon targeting and surveillance, and other relevant mission areas. Supporting the Strategic Deterrence and Strategic Sealift/Protection JMAs, the Mobile Offshore Base Project will demonstrate the feasibility of a forward positioned Strike Platform in geographical areas where surrounding non-aligned countries desire to maintain their sovereignty.

Beginning in FY 96, the PE will be divided into two projects, Cruise Missile Defense (R2145) and Mobile Offshore Base (R2266). These two projects were both previously tasks funded within project 2145.

(U) Cruise Missile Defense: This is a continuation of a program initiated in FY 94. The Cruise Missile Defense AdvancedTechnology effort includes: 1) an ACTD, Phase I, which demonstrates that an AEGIS ship (or other surface based missile launch platform) using one or more surrogate airborne sensor partners can provide greatly expanded air defense capabilities leading to a robust capability against overland cruise missiles beyond surface based radar line-of-sight; 2) and a CMD Phase II that accelerates and aligns E-2C AEW aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs toward a fielded CMD capability and balances performance, cost, schedule and risk across multiple technology programs; and initiates advanced missile technology efforts to develop and demonstrate engagement capabilities against next generation overland cruise missiles.

(U) Mobile Offshore Base (MOB): New project starting in FY 96 to develop a MOB concept to provide a means by which a long-term U.S. presence can be maintained. Technology issues associated with both semi-submersible and mono-hull modules connected into platforms between 1000 and 3000 meters in length will be explored. Technical challenges include mobility to get on station, as well as sea keeping and stability to support cargo transfer.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is budgeted within the ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT Budget Activity because it encompasses design, development, simulation, or experimental testing or prototype hardware to validate technological feasibility and concept of operations and reduce technological risk prior to initiation of a new acquisition program or transition to an ongoing acquisition program.

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT

NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL

TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

R2145 Cruise Missile Defense

36,665 48,525 46,311 31,559 12,334 0 0 0 214,352

(Note: In FY 1993-1995 this project also includes Studies & Simulations, Precision Signal Targeting System, Real Time Support Power Projection, NATACMS, Air Ship Demonstration. FY96 and out reflect only Cruise Missile Defense Efforts)

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program focuses science and technology resources in the areas of Precision Strike and Air Superiority/Defense in support of the Joint Chiefs of Staff's (JCS's) top five Joint Warfighting Capabilities and the following Joint Mission Areas (JMAs): Joint Strike, Joint Littoral Warfare, Joint Surveillance, Strategic Deterrence and Strategic Sealift/Protection.

(U) The Global Surveillance and Communications area, transferred to Program Element (PE) 0603794N for FY 1995, developed and demonstrated the capability to provide the tactical user with theater of operations, near-real-time precision targeting information, sensor-to-shooter target updating, and Battle Damage Assessment generated from multiple existing high-altitude resources supporting all the referenced JMAs with primary applicability to Joint Surveillance and Joint Littoral Warfare Mission Areas.

(U) Precision Strike integrates surveillance and targeting capabilities developed in the Global Surveillance area with high-speed processing and precision weapons for rapid response against high-value, short-dwell targets over extended ranges. The Navy Tactical Missile System (NATACMS) provided a demonstration launch of a Navy variant of the Army Tactical Missile System from a ship in support of the Navy's Surface Fire Support mission.

(U) The Air Superiority and Defense area develops and demonstrates all-weather, day/night engagement capabilities against manned aircraft, cruise missiles (including supersonic sea-skimmers), helicopters and tactical ballistic missiles that will be employing stealth and countermeasures. The Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) Advanced Technology effort includes: 1) an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD), Phase I, which demonstrates that an AEGIS ship (or other surface based missile launch platform) using one or more surrogate airborne sensor partners can provide greatly expanded air defense capabilities leading to a robust capability against overland cruise missiles beyond based radar line-of-sight; 2) and a CMD Phase II that accelerates and aligns E-2C Airborne Early Warning (AEW) aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs toward a fielded CMD capability and balances performance, cost, schedule and risk across multiple technology programs; and initiates advanced missile technology efforts to develop and demonstrate engagement capabilities against next generation overland cruise missiles. The Airship Demonstration assesses the potential contribution that airships could make to the airborne component of the ship self defense/cooperative engagement capability, over-the-horizon targeting and surveillance, and other relevant mission areas. Supporting the Strategic Deterrence and Strategic Sealift/Protection JMAs, the Mobile Offshore Base Project will demonstrate the feasibility of a forward positioned Strike Platform in geographical areas where surrounding non-aligned countries desire to maintain their sovereignty.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS

1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($217) STUDIES AND SIMULATIONS:

- (U) Initiated

-- (U) Modeling and simulation of ship-based over-the-horizon cruise missile defense with airborne surveillance and tracking to develop operational concepts for deployment jointly with the Army and Air Force. This is the last year for this task. Starting in FY 96, the effort will be continued under the Cruise Missile Defense Technology Program.

(U) ($3,150) NATACMS:

- (U) Completed:

-- (U) Ship systems modifications

-- (U) Shipboard system integration

-- (U) Demonstration firing and documentation of results.

(U) ($26,695) MOUNTAIN TOP/PHASE I of Cruise Missile Defense Advanced Technology (CMD ACTD) effort (Continued effort from FY 1994, funding in PE 0603792N):

- (U) Initiated:

-- (U) Work to design system to transfer Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) data to Army PATRIOT Battery for analysis of future development and in preparation for simulated Army missile firing events.

- (U) Completed:

-- (U) Design and integration studies for airborne platform prototype and modify SM-2 missiles to be used in test.

-- (U) Integrated and conducted mountain top test of Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) surveillance radar sensor suite, MK-74 Missile Fire Control System and (CEC) against low flyers.

-- (U) Installation of CEC units on the mountain top and in designated AEGIS ship and complete ship's training.

-- (U) Planning for live fire demonstration.

(U) ($6,603) AIRSHIP DEMONSTRATION (Expanded effort From FY 1994 Funding in PE 0603755N/Assessment of potential contribution of airships to airborne components of ship defense):

- (U) Completed

-- (U) Operational evaluations of the Airship as an advanced sensor platform.

-- (U) Demonstration of operations of Airship as a potential airborne component of CEC for ship defense.

-- (U) Demonstration of Specific Emitter Identifier for combat identification (ID).

-- (U) Demonstration of an advanced sensor for cruise missile detection.

-- (U) Operations demonstrating Airship Platform in the Littoral.

3. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:

(U) ($46,653) PHASE I ($18,629) AND PHASE II ($28,024) OF CMD ACTD

- (U) Phase I (Mountain Top) Activities: Complete final captive seeker sea clutter data collection, and Navy SM-2 live missile firings against Over the Horizon (OTH) target drones using data from the mountain top sensor suite. Complete Army simulated missile firings at OTH target drones using data from the mountain top sensor suite. Prepare required reports. Complete Phase I of the CMD ACTD.

- (U) Phase II Activities: Upgrade baseline E-2C AEW aircraft and Standard Missile (SM-2) programs. Initiate design, development, and integration efforts for surveillance platform and advanced missile seeker/fuze. Design tests for airborne sensors against airborne targets. Develop Phase II captive seeker sea/land data collection test plan. Expand Makaha Radar Facility FY 1997 and FY 1999 critical experiments/demonstrations (MRF 97 & MRF 99); upgrade weapon control modes, overland performance,and handover.

(U) ($1,872) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovative Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.

4. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($46,311) Cruise Missile Defense Phase II

- (U) Initiate:

-- (U) Makaha Radar Facility (MRF 97) critical experiments/demonstration

- (U) Continue:

-- (U) Test planning for Makaha Radar Facility (MRF 97 and MRF 99)

-- (U) Begin design, development integration and planning efforts for the Phase II demonstration to support extended horizon engagement of cruise missiles.

-- (U) Advanced missile seeker and fuze technology development and surveillance upgrades leading toward captive flight testing in FY 1999.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997

(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 37,170 64,502 67,423

(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: -505 -15,977 -21,112

(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 36,665 48,525 46,311

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 1995 reduction reflects a combination of (-$1,500) due to a Congressional S&T rescission and a minor increase in program requirements (+995). Funding level decrease in FY 1996 reflects Program Review decision to split the PE into two projects: (-$13,500) moves to MOB stand alone project R2266; undistributed Congressional reductions (-$1,326); revised DoD inflation estimates (-$701). FY 1997 changes reflect: revised DoD inflation estimates (-$1,400); minor repricing adjustments (-$639); a transfer to Mobile Offshore Base (MOB)(-$9,731) and a reduction based on program realignment (-$11,381).

(U) Schedule: Not applicable

(U) Technical: Not applicable

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0601153N (Defense Research Sciences)

(U) PE 0602111N (Air and Surface Weapons Technology)

(U) PE 0602121N (Surface Ship and Submarine HM&E Technology)

(U) PE 0602122N (Aircraft Technology)

(U) PE 0602234N (Materials, Electronics and Computer Technology)

(U) PE 0603006A (C3 Advanced Technology)

(U) PE 0603226E (Experimental Evaluation of Innovative Technologies)

(U) PE 0603238F (Air Defense/Precision Strike Technology Demo)

(U) PE 0603245F (Advanced Flight Technology Integration)

(U) PE 0603270N (Advanced Electronic Warfare Technology)

(U) PE 0603401F (Advanced Spacecraft Technology)

(U) PE 0603563N (Ship Concept Advanced Design)

(U) PE 0603601F (Conventional Weapons Technology)

(U) PE 0603726F (C3I Subsystem Integration)

(U) PE 0603755N (Ship Self Defense/Cooperative Engagement Capability)

(U) PE 0603772A (Advanced Tactical Computer Science and Sensor Technology)

(U) PE 0603794N (C3 Advanced Technology)

(U) PE 0604866C (Patriot Risk Reduction Mitigation)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT

NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL

TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

R2266 Mobile Offshore Base

0 13,893 9,249 4,610 0 0 0 0 27,752

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project is a new start in FY 96. This project focuses science and technology resources in the areas of Precision Strike and Air Superiority/Defense in support of the Joint Chiefs of Staff's top five Joint Warfighting Capabilities and the following Joint Mission Areas: Joint Strike, Joint Littoral Warfare, Strategic Deterrence and Strategic Sealift/Protection.

(U) The Mobile Offshore Base (MOB) Project will demonstrate the feasibility of a forward positioned Strike Platform in geographical areas where surrounding non-aligned countries desire to maintain their sovereignty. This new task will develop a MOB concept to provide a means by which a long-term U.S. presence can be maintained. Technology issues associated with both semi-submersible and mono-hull modules connected into platforms between 1500 and 3000 meters in length will be explored. Technical challenges include mobility to get on station, as well as sea keeping and stability to support cargo transfer.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Not applicable.

2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN: (New project start)

(U) ($13,893) MOBILE OFFSHORE BASE (New start will transfer ARPA developed technology to the U.S. Navy for continued development and technology demonstration):

- (U) Initiate:

-- (U) Transfer ARPA developed critical technologies for MOB components.

-- (U) Sub-scale tests of the complete system to demonstrate and determine risks associated with full scale construction.

3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

(U) ($9,249) MOBILE OFFSHORE BASE:

- (U) Initiate:

-- (U) Definition of and resolution of significant technical issues.

-- (U) Development and design of high sea-state cargo transfer concepts.

-- (U) Design and fabrication of MOB test models.

- (U) Continue:

-- (U) Development of inter-module connectors and anchoring systems.

-- (U) Evaluation of MOB survivability.

-- (U) Full scale design.

- (U) Complete:

-- (U) Design of high sea-state cargo transfer concept.

-- (U) Testing of models.

-- (U) MOB survivability study.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997

(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 0 0 0

(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: 0 +13,893 +9,249

(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 0 13,893 9,249

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: New project created starting in FY 1996. FY 1996 and FY 1997 MOB funding and task moved to this project from Project R2145.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL

ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

(U) OPN Line 150000

0 0 0 0 209,085 0 209,045 433,249 851,379

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0601153N (Defense Research Sciences)

(U) PE 0602111N (Air and Surface Weapons Technology)

(U) PE 0602121N (Surface Ship and Submarine HM&E Technology)

(U) PE 0602122N (Aircraft Technology)

(U) PE 0603226E (Experimental Evaluation of Innovative Technologies)

(U) PE 0603238F (Air Defense/Precision Strike Technology Demo)

(U) PE 0603245F (Advanced Flight Technology Integration)

(U) PE 0603563N (Ship Concept Advanced Design)

(U) PE 0603601F (Conventional Weapons Technology)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.