(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
L2097 Manpower, Personnel and Training
318 266 250 254 293 299 307 CONT. CONT.
M0106 Naval Medical Support Capability
139 105 100 103 119 122 125 CONT. CONT.
R0132 CNO Program Analysis and Evaluation
271 262 258 264 310 317 325 CONT. CONT.
R0133 National Academy of Sciences/Naval Studies Board
1,342 1,957 2,375 2,388 2,419 2,420 2,420 CONT. CONT.
R0147 Operational Strategic and Tactical Effectiveness Analysis
415 403 393 405 474 484 495 CONT. CONT.
R2040 Foreign Ship and Submarine Vulnerability Program
597 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,403
S2233 Naval Surface Warfare Studies
1,950 1,767 1,677 1,709 1,951 1,996 2,043 CONT. CONT.
W2092 Naval Aviation Studies
1,636 2,018 2,121 2,000 2,032 2,047 2,061 CONT. CONT.
TOTAL 6,668 6,778 7,174 7,123 7,598 7,685 7,776 CONT. CONT.
(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides analytical support to the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations as a basis for major policy, planning and acquisition program execution decisions. It supports research and development strategy development and planning. It supports studies in the areas of manpower, personnel, training, and aviation. It also develops analytical tools for evaluating effectiveness of U.S. weapons against potential foreign threat ships and submarines.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports the operations and installations required for general research and development use.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
L2097 Manpower, Personnel and Training
318 266 250 254 293 299 307 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Chief of Naval Personnel has an ongoing need for direct analyses of Navy manpower and personnel (MP) policies and program planning. This project provides an essential management tool to: (a) assess the effectiveness of existing MP policies and programs, (b) identify needs for new policies and programs, (c) determine the required manpower and training mix relative to changing demographic, societal and legislative/regulatory trends, and to evolving strategic and geopolitical factors, (d) study the impact of MP programs on Navy accession, retention, and performance, and (e) develop, validate and/or refine a broad range of MP forecasting models. The program permits Navy to more effectively utilize Research and Development expertise to respond to emerging MP problems.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($75) Started a study of how professionally-managed recreation programs promote gender integration.
(U) ($25) Conducted a study effort to define and assess the extent of violence involving Navy personnel or family members.
(U) ($50) Completed of the Navy Combat Leadership study for inclusion into Navy Leadership Continuum.
(U) ($66) Conducted a study to determine how best to incorporate the new 1700 officer community into the office projection and planning models.
(U) ($40) Completed study of costs and benefits of alternative graduate education programs.
(U) ($32) Initiated an analysis of the Navy Retention/Separation Questionnaire to determine accuracy, and suitability for intended purposes.
(U) ($30) Conducted analysis to assist manpower planners in determining infrastructure inefficiencies, duplication of functions among activities and potential for reduction or consolidation in support of Program Review 97.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($49) Complete study of professionally-managed recreation programs in promoting gender integration.
(U) ($65) Conduct studies and analyses on impact of moving the Bureau of Naval Personnel (BUPERS).
(U) ($75) Support the BUPERS initiatives to examine how manpower and personnel management should be done in the future.
(U) ($48) Support efforts to relate quality of life to retention and readiness.
(U) ($25) Complete analysis of the Navy Retention/Separation Questionnaire.
(U) ($4) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($67) Support efforts to redefine the way manpower and personnel management is done in the future.
(U) ($74) Support efforts to redefine and establish career paths for Navy enlisted personnel similar to the Navy officer career paths.
(U) ($74) Continue to perform studies and analysis of the women on ships initiatives.
(U) ($35) Examine cultural diversity and the impact it will have on readiness and effectiveness.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 318 273 257
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: 0 -7 -7
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 318 266 250
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustment is due to the following: Congressional undistributed reductions (-4), revised DOD economic assumptions (-3). FY 1997 reduction is based on revised DOD inflation estimates (-7).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0603707N (Manpower, Personnel, and Training Advanced Technology Development)
(U) PE 0604703N (Manpower, Personnel, Training, Simulation and Human Factors)
(U) PE 0602234N (Materials, Electronics and Computer Technology)
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
M0106 Navy Medical Support Capability
139 105 100 103 119 122 125 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides validated data to identify the root causes of problems and to optimize services associated with the health care delivery to Navy and Marine Corps personnel afloat and in contingency operations. This usually requires database and model development and statistical analyses of inter-related requirements or operational variables, and their impact on performance. The analysis of these variables requires a combination of medical/technical knowledge and operational perspectives.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($139) Analyzed the database of pregnancy outcomes to identify potential health risks for women aboard ships; identified medical evacuation patterns, potential reproductive hazards, and issues of health care delivery for female patients to provide data on increasing numbers of women in deployed or operational environments to optimize health care.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($105) Establish a database from multiple sources and examine the relationships between completed suicides, gestures, and attempts, and organizational and environmental factors in the Navy and Marine Corps to identify risk factors and opportunities for intervention.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($100) Evaluate changing operational requirements and identify methods to improve the aggregation, display, and utilization of shipboard automated medical system (SAMS) information to assist fleet surgeons and force medical officers in mission support.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 106 106 103
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: +33 -1 -3
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 139 105 100
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1995 increase reflects execution adjustment (+33). FY 1996 reduction is due to a Congressional general reduction (-1K). FY 1997 reduction is due to revised DOD inflation estimate (-3).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
R0132 CNO Program Analysis and Evaluation
271 262 258 264 310 317 325 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides analytical support to the Chief of Naval Operations and the Secretary of the Navy in evaluation of overall balance within total Navy programs. This includes such tasks as: (a) evaluation of force capabilities and requirements; (b) analysis of effectiveness of systems under development; (c) Secretary of Defense directed independent cost and effectiveness analyses of major Navy programs; and (d) items of Congressional interest as they relate to Navy programs. Deliverables consist of formal, structured documents containing or leading to conclusions and/or recommendations as well as the development and maintenance of databases and models. The use of databases and models is driven by the need to objectively and continually assess the impact of reduced funding and/or force drawdown upon Navy programs. They provide Navy planners and decision makers with objective, empirical data with which to make determinations regarding program planning and evaluation of issues. The models funded by this account are the primary tools used to formulate program balance in the assessment process (particularly the Readiness, Support and Infrastructure Assessment and the Investment Balance Review). The analyses based on these models form the heart of the Investment Balance Review, allowing the Navy to formulate and cost-out alternative force structure, manpower, infrastructure and readiness programs.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($248) Maintained the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model.
(U) ($23) Continued to conduct studies and analyses to support the Navy's Assessment process.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($262) Develop, maintain and perform analysis with the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model (including Navy parts inventory work) and other econometric and readiness models.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($258) Develop, maintain and perform analysis with the Aviation Readiness model and the Ships Resource-to-Readiness model (including Navy parts inventory work) and other econometric models.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 271 269 265
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: 0 -7 -7
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 271 262 258
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustment is due to the following: Congressional undistributed reductions (-4), revised DOD economic assumptions (-3). FY 1997 adjustment is due to the following: revised DOD inflation estimate (-7).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0605154N (Center for Naval Analysis)
(U) PE 0605873M (Marine Corps Program Wide Support)
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
R0133 National Academy of Sciences/Naval Studies Board
1,342 1,957 2,375 2,388 2,419 2,420 2,420 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project supports the core program for the Naval Studies Board. As agreed upon between the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and the President of the National Academy of Sciences and with appropriate attention to the influence of the domestic economy, national objectives, social imperatives and anticipated military requirement, the Naval Studies Board will conduct and report upon surveys, investigations, and analyses in the field of scientific research and development applicable to the operation and function of the Navy. Reports consist of a briefing to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research Development and Acquisition) (ASN (RD&A)) and the CNO and staff, and written technical reports. This project supported Technology Initiative Games at the Naval War College in FY 1995.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($1,342) Continued Office of Naval Research (ONR) research efforts and investigations in the areas of interest to the Navy. Continued to support annual Navy authorized activities of importance, such as the Annual Classified Military Space Symposium and the Weinblum Memorial Lecture Series. Also continued to support the Technology Initiative Games at the Naval War College.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($658) Continue ONR research efforts and investigations in the areas of interest to the Navy. Continue to support annual Navy authorized activities of importance, such as the Annual Classified Military Space Symposium and the Weinblum Memorial Lecture Series.
(U) ($1,255) Produce investigations of significant importance to the Navy concerning technology of the future, selected from proposals received from CNO and ASN (RD&A).
(U) ($44) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($658) Continue ONR research efforts and investigations in the areas of interest to the Navy. Continue to support annual Navy authorized activities of importance, such as the Annual Classified Military Space Symposium and the Weinblum Memorial Lecture Series.
(U) ($1,717) Produce investigations of significant importance to the Navy concerning technology of the future, selected from proposals received from CNO and ASN (RD&A).
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 423 2,494 2,507
(U) Adjustments from PRESBUDG: +919 -537 -132
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 1,342 1,957 2,375
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1995 change reflects increased program requirements (+919). FY 1996 adjustment is due to the following: miscellaneous Congressional specific reductions and undistributed reductions (-514), revised DOD economic assumptions (-23). FY 1997 is due to the following: management support reductions to Naval Studies Board
(-61), and revised DOD inflation estimates (-71).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
R0147 Operational Strategic and Tactical Effectiveness Analysis
415 403 393 405 474 484 495 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides the Chief of Naval Operations and the Secretary of the Navy direct analyses of Navy policy, strategy acquisition, and program planning in meeting the following objectives: (a) producing study results impacting upon important programs/issues; (b) identifying and evaluating policy and strategy alternatives and doctrine; and (c) evaluating the capabilities of programmed forces to accomplish missions assigned to the Navy. Deliverables consist of formal, structured documents containing or leading to conclusions and/or recommendations as well as the development and maintenance of databases and models. This project directly supports and is critical for conducting the Navy's joint mission assessments.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($215) Conducted studies and performed analysis evaluating concepts and strategies, defining requirements, assessing capabilities, reviewing program alternatives and analyzing program and planning issues.
(U) ($200) Updated the Capabilities Resource Allocation Display (CAPRAD) Database, Integrated Program Assessment (IPAS), and Integrated Theater Engagement Model (ITEM).
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($214) Continual reviews of the CAPRAD Database will be conducted and econometric/statistical analyses will be performed on the impact of changes resulting from downsizing and programmatic changes. Plans also include updating and revalidating the IPAS and other models in order to run these programs using revised allocation displays.
(U) ($175) Conduct studies and provide enhancements to ITEM, the primary tool for campaign analysis for Assessments.
(U) ($14) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($218) Continual reviews of the CAPRAD Database will be conducted and econometric/statistical analyses will be performed on the impact of changes resulting from downsizing and programmatic changes. Plans also include updating and revalidating the IPAS and other models in order to run these programs using revised allocation displays.
(U) ($175) Conduct studies and provide enhancements to ITEM, the primary tool for campaign analysis for Assessments.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 415 414 404
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: 0 -11 -11
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 415 403 393
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1996 adjustment is due to the following: Congressional undistributed reductions (-7), revised DOD economic assumptions (-4). FY 1997 reduction is due to revised DOD inflation estimtaes (-11).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E:
(U) PE 0605154N (Center for Naval Analyses)
(U) PE 0605873M (Marine Corps Program Wide Support)
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
S2233 Naval Surface Warfare Studies
1,950 1,767 1,677 1,709 1,951 1,996 2,043 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides for analysis of the warfighting capability of Naval forces by examining specific selected numbers and mixes of surface combatants and other forces that are subjected to representative operational situations in a joint littoral environment. The U.S. strategic emphasis has shifted from global containment and warfighting to a global stability strategy with regional focus. As part of an overall effort at addressing future Naval force levels and capabilities, the Navy must assess the warfighting effectiveness of different mixes of surface combatants in battle groups operating in a littoral warfare environment and develop an investment strategy that supports the capabilities required. Required Operational Capabilities/Projected Operational Environment (ROC/POE) must be updated every two years or created for new ship classes. These ROC/POE's are vitally important in that mission requirements for ships drive equipment configurations, manning levels and associated shipboard accommodations, tailor ship and staff missions, capabilities, manning to new strategies, tactics, operational environments, and policies.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($1,950) Conducted campaign analyses to identify battle force capabilities considering various force mixes. These analyses contributed to developing functional requirements of various task groups in a Joint Littoral context. Warfare capabilities and Measures of Effectiveness obtained from scoping models and these results were used in characterizing capabilities for battle space dominance (air, undersea, surface and land) and for power projection. Verified accuracy of results, reviewed and modified campaign scenarios and operational situations to scope, focus and interpret the analyses. Applied results of these analyses are applicable to the Future Surface Combatant Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA). Incorporated results into strategic planning and investment strategies for future Joint Littoral Warfare Naval Forces. Revised ROC/POE instructions.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($1,739) Continue analyses to identify battle force capabilities considering various force mixes. These studies will address the warfighting and national security policy and strategy requirements for effective, flexible and cost-efficient Naval Surface Warfare Forces, including the numbers and mixes of surface combatants and other forces that are subjected to representative operational situations in a joint littoral environment. Measures of Effectiveness will be used in characterizing Naval Surface Warfare capabilities for battle space dominance and for power projection. The results will be verified, reviewed and applied to campaign scenarios and operational situations to scope, focus and interpret the analyses. The results of these analyses will be applied to the 21st century combatant (SC 21) COEA and into strategic planning and investment strategies for future Joint Littoral Warfare Naval Forces. Revise ROC/POE instructions.
(U) ($28) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($1,677) Continue analyses of Naval Surface Warfare capabilities required for battle space dominance and power projection. Littoral warfare requirements will continue to shape the definition of surface ship capabilities. These studies will be aimed at obtaining the required capabilities in an affordable and effective surface fleet. Revise ROC/POE instructions.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 1,972 1,840 1,763
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: -22 -73 -86
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 1,950 1,767 1,677
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1995 funding change reflects decrease program requirements (-22). FY 1996 funding decrease reflects Congressional undistributed reductions (-53), revised DOD economic assumptions (-20). FY 1997 funding changes include revised DOD economic assumptions (-50), and minor pricing adjustments (-36).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.
(U) COST (Dollars in Thousands)
PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
W2092 Naval Aviation Studies
1,636 2,018 2,121 2,000 2,032 2,047 2,061 CONT. CONT.
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project supports studies over a wide range of naval aviation issues that support the ongoing Joint Strike Assessment (JSA) guidelines. Results provide a basis for recommendations to the Chief of Naval Operations concerning major policy, planning, and acquisition program decisions. This effort is a management initiative which will allow allocation of study resources in a timely manner according to priorities. This ongoing program will continue to leverage more detailed program specific analysis in order to gain insight in acquisition of various weapon systems and their impact on force structure, manning levels, operational readiness and Carrier Air Wing (CVW) effectiveness. This program will also support various Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) Studies.
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:
1. (U) FY 1995 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(U) ($400) Continued CVBG mix requirement analysis based on new tactical and supported aircraft procurement strategies and new world threat structure.
(U) ($330) Continued and expanded analysis of strike effectiveness in parametric threat environment with tradeoffs and sensitivities associated with tactics, electronic countermeasures and signature control.
(U) ($56) Conducted general aviation studies and COEA studies.
(U) ($300) Conducted studies identified from JSA briefings, including support to other assessment areas.
(U) ($550) Funded the OSD Precision Strike Architecture Study.
2. (U) FY 1996 PLAN:
(U) ($299) Conduct analyses of joint theater ballistic missile defense operations in support of USCINCPAC Forces Korea with Army, Air Force, Ballistic Missile Defense Office, Joint Transfer Missile Defense personnel utilizing the Weapons and Tactics Analysis Center (WEPTAC).
(U) ($199) Conduct a joint (N2, N88, and Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office) study of Predator unmanned air vehicle marinization options under the Joint Program Office.
(U) ($680) Conduct the first phase of a two year effort to determine the mission requirements for a Common Support Aircraft (CSA) which will lead to a Milestone 0 decision.
(U) ($398) Conduct studies and support for the Joint Strike Assessment process including a study which analyzes alternatives for Naval Aviation squadron reorganization for the E-2/C-2, ES-3/S-3, FA-18 and P-3/EP-3/Reef Point communities, carrier sortie generation, FA-18E/F survivability.
(U) ($398) Conduct analyses of unified Commander in Chief's Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) Attack Operations concepts as part of the Tri-Service TBMD Attack Operations leading to the development of a Navy concept of operations with the Navy Doctrine Command.
(U) ($26) Provide support for aviation related COEAs and studies within NAVAIR and OPNAV.
(U) ($18) Portion of program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.
3. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:
(U) ($400) Continue and expand analyses of TACAIR and weapons effectiveness including tradeoffs of development and acquisition alternatives utilizing the WEPTAC modeling and simulation (M&S) facility. Perform sensitivity analyses utilizing additional M&S tolls as required.
(U) ($400) Continue TBMD Attack Operations analyses; develop documentation and criteria to support an Operations Requirements Document.
(U) ($400) Continue studies to support JSA issues for the current and follow-on cycle.
(U) ($900) Continue and complete the CSA study leading to a Milestone 0 decision.
(U) ($21) Conduct general aviation and related COEAs.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997
(U) FY 1996 President's Budget: 1,086 3,885 4,144
(U) Adjustments from FY 1996 PRESBUDG: +550 -1,867 -2,023
(U) FY 1997 PRESBUDG Submit: 1,636 2,018 2,121
(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
(U) Funding: FY 1995 change reflects an increase in program requirements (+550). FY 1996 reduction reflects the Congressional cancellation of the Common Light Vertical Aircraft study and undistributed reductions (-1,844) and revised DOD economic assumptions (-23). FY 1997 changes include revised DOD inflation estimates (-64) and reduced program requirements (-1,959).
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.
(U) Technical: Not applicable.
C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable.
(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.