Index

 

COST (In Thousands)

FY 1996 Actual

FY 1997 Estimate

FY 1998 Estimate

FY 1999 Estimate

FY 2000 Estimate

FY 2001 Estimate

FY 2002 Estimate

FY 2003 Estimate

Cost to Complete

Total Cost

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Technology) and the Army Acquisition Executive (AAE) directed the establishment of the Aerostat Joint Project Office (JPO) for Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense (LACMD) and directed the funding for FY 96-01. This is a multiservice effort with the Army as the lead service. The Aerostat JPO is assigned to the AAE with operational control assigned to the U. S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command. The program mission is to maximize the battle space of land, sea and air based missile systems by providing Over-the-Horizon (OTH) surveillance and precision track for broad area defense against land attack cruise missiles. Aerostats are theater based systems employing advanced technologies with specific focus on LACMD. Aerostat sensors provide the OTH surveillance/precision tracking for the Air Directed Surface to Air Missile (ADSAM) concept. The role of the aerostat is to expand the battlefield commander’s surveillance and engagement capability against cruise missiles and other low flying aircraft by extending the battle space for systems such as Patriot, Medium Extended Air Defense System/Corps SAM, Aegis and Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). This project supports upgrades to existing surveillance and tracking systems and is appropriately placed in Budget Activity 7.

Acquisition Strategy: The Aerostat JPO executed a Concept Studies Phase by soliciting CMD architecture concepts that employ aerostats. The most promising concept(s), up to 2, will be carried to a subsequent phase for design and risk mitigation of the aerostat system. The government will downselect at contract award (1st Qtr FY98), at the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) or at the Critical Design Review (CDR). Risk reduction activities will include testbed type activities and/or testing at the component level. Risk reduction activities are being conducted in parallel by DARPA and Other Government Agencies (OGAs) to mitigate technical and operation risk areas. Testbed and modeling/simulation activities support the risk mitigation effort. One prototype aerostat system will be developed utilizing the design and risk

mitigation effort and products.

FY 1996 Accomplishments:

 

4000

Established the Joint Project Office (JPO) and awarded 3 Concept Definition Contracts.

Total

4000

 

FY 1997 Planned Program:

 

11994

Complete Concept Definition and initiate ACTD Risk Mitigation & Design Phase .

 

1435

Conduct Test and Evaluation (Testbed)

4602

Joint Project Office.

 

7701

Risk reduction program.

 

644

Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) Programs.

Total

26376

 

FY 1998 Planned Program:

 

61700

ACTD Risk Mitigation & Design Contracts

 

18534

Risk Mitigation, Test & Evaluation, Demonstrations and exercises.

 

5959

Aerostat Joint Project Office. Army, Navy, and Air Force on-site and off-site costs.

Total

86193

 

FY 1999 Planned Program:

 

94648

Complete ACTD Risk Mitigation & Design contracts and award ACTD Development & Demo contract.

 

31900

Conduct Test and Evaluation (Testbed) and proof of concepts.

 

7750

Aerostat Joint Project Office. Army, Navy and Air Force on-site and off-site costs.

Total

134298

 

B. Project Change Summary

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 1997 President’s Budget

12993

38940

106592

134940

Appropriated Value

4000

26376

   

Adjustments to Appropriated Value

   

FY 1998 BES/Pres Bud Request

4000

26376

86193

134298

Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY 96 - Congressional reprogramming request (12993), Congress approved $4000.

FY 97 - Congressional reduction (-12000) during appropriation markup

Futher reduction (-564) reprogrammed to higher priority programs.

Schedule: Funding reductions required restructuring of the acquisition strategy. The concept definition phase will extend through 3rd qtr FY 97. ACTD risk mitigation/design contract will be awarded in 1st qtr FY 98. The acquisition strategy allows downselect at contract award, PDR, or CDR. Decision will be dependent upon maturity of technology. One prototype aerostat system will be completed and delivered in FY02.

C. Other Program Funding Summary

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

To

Compl

Total

Cost

Army Missile Command PE 0603009A

5000

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6000

DARPA

1000

                 

D. Schedule Profile

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

 

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

Program Office established

 

X*

                           

Program Plan to OSD

 

X*

                         

Definition Phase**

     

X

X

X

X

                 

OSD Review

               

X

         

X

 

ACTD Risk Mitigation/Design**

         

   

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

ACTD Development & Demo**

                           

X

X

Test Bed**

   

X*

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

*Denotes completed milestone

**Efforts are/will be on-going. Will be denoted by an asterisk when completed.

A. Project Cost Breakdown

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

Product Development & Risk Mitigation

2598

21130

80234

126548

Program Management

1402

4602

5959

7750

SBIR/STTR

 

644

   

Total

4000

26376

86193

134298

B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information

Performing Organizations

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

 

 

FY 1996

 

 

FY 1997

 

 

FY 1998

 

 

FY 1999

 

Budget to Complete

 

Total Program

Product Development Organizations

H&R

C/CPFF

30 Sep 96

2000

2000

0

666

1334

     

2000

Lockheed Martin

C/CPFF

30 Sep 96

2000

2000

0

666

1334

     

2000

Northrop Grum

C/CPFF

30 Sep 96

2000

2000

0

666

1334

     

2000

OGA

MIPR

   

4872

   

4872

     

4872

ACTD Risk Mit/

Design - TBD

C/CPAF

3 Nov 97

117600

0

0

0

0

56000

53700

7900

117600

OGAs

MIPR

   

27600

     

5700

18900

3000

27600

Dev & Demo TBD

C\CPAF

Jul 99

 

257048

       

22048

23500

45548

Support and Management Organizations

Aerostat JPO

     

44401

 

1402

4602

5959

7750

24688

44401

Support Contracts

C/CPFF

TBD

 

29465

 

600

3120

4000

5000

16745

29465

SBIR/STTR

     

644

   

644

     

644

Test and Evaluation Organizations

OGAs

MIPR

   

103551

0

0

7701

8534

20900

66416

103551

Test Bed - TBD

     

13435

0

0

1435

6000

6000

0

13435

Government Furnished Property: None

 

 

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

 

FY 1996

 

FY 1997

 

FY 1998

 

FY 1999

Budget to Complete

Total Program

Subtotal Product Development

 

1998

8874

61700

94648

34400

201620

Subtotal Support and Management

 

2002

8366

9959

12750

41433

74510

Subtotal Test and Evaluation

   

9136

14534

26900

66416

116986

Total Project

 

4000

26376

86193

134298

142249

393116

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK