--------------------------------------------------------------------------- PENUMBER: 0603868C PETITLE: Navy Theater Wide TMD COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1266 Navy Theater Wide Missile Defense 200,442 304,171 194,898 192,073 191,229 190,930 145,190 149,444 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Navy Theater Wide (NTW) Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) program builds upon the Navy Area Theater Missile Defense (TMD) program and the national investment in AEGIS ships, weapons systems, and missiles. Two classes of ships are deployed with the AEGIS combat system: the Ticonderoga Class cruisers and the Arleigh Burke Class destroyers. Navy Theater Wide BMD will take advantage key naval forces attributes including overseas presence, mobility, flexibility, and sustainability to provide protection of a theater of operations. The Navy Theater Wide BMD program will provide an exo-atmospheric naval regional defense capability to counter the TBM threat. In accordance with the BMD Program Review in early 1996, the Navy Theater Wide program is conducting the following activities: an AEGIS LEAP system level intercept demonstration, Kinetic Warhead (KW) technology assessments and concept definition studies, and system engineering efforts to identify key technical risk reduction activities including discrimination and KW lethality. Since the FY97 President’s Budget request, the Department has provided additional funds for FY 98-01 to increase testing and conduct more in-depth risk reduction. Ongoing advanced technology studies provide the anticipated objective system improvements required to meet the evolving threat. This project is assigned to the Budget Activity and Program Element codes as identified in this descriptive summary in accordance with existing Department of Defense policy. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $158,970 Continued NTW TBMD planning and studies, and continue Navy Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA) Phase II. Conducted system and design engineering to support the guidance-to-hit (GTH) technical demonstration flights including SM-2/LEAP limited integration. Conducted AEGIS Weapon System (AWS) integration for an NTW interceptor and provide limited AWS integration to support the GTH demonstration flights. - $15,972 Provided technical support and historical expertise for NTW program. - $17,000 Provided follow-on engineering and analysis to conduct system engineering and risk reduction activities. - $5,000 Conducted initial concept exploration analysis under the Joint System Engineering interceptor studies. - $3,500 Conducted initial lethality tests for momentum/weight effects. - $200,442 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $170,200 Continue Vertical Launch System (VLS) integration of the technical demonstration interceptor. Continue engineering for the NTW regional defense program and continue specific concept investigations and technology demonstrations. - $80,100 Conduct kill vehicle technology assessments and shipboard system risk reduction activities. - $25,450 Continue NTW TBMD planning and studies, and complete Navy COEA Phase II. - $24,000 Continue AEGIS Weapon System integration for an NTW interceptor and provide limited AWS integration to support the GTH demonstration flights. - $4,421 Continue follow-on engineering and analysis to support NTW. - $304,171 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $119,000 Continue planning and system engineering in support of the end game GTH demonstration flights. Continue VLS integration of the technical demonstration interceptor. - $35,542 Conduct kill vehicle technology assessments and shipboard system risk reduction activities. - $19,528 Continue NTW TBMD planning and studies. - $19,377 Continue AEGIS Weapon System integration for an NTW interceptor and provide limited AWS integration to support the end game demonstration flights. - $1,451 Continue follow-on engineering and analysis to support NTW. - $194,898 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $113,000 Continue planning and system engineering in support of the end game GTH demonstration flights. Continue VLS integration of the technical demonstration interceptor. - $41,375 Conduct kill vehicle technology assessments and shipboard system risk reduction activities. - $19,747 Continue NTW TBMD planning and studies. - $17,951 Continue AEGIS Weapon System integration for an NTW interceptor and provide limited AWS integration to support the end game GTH demonstration flights. - $192,073 Total Acquisition Strategy: The Navy acquisition strategy is to leverage the AEGIS ship anti-air warfare capability development by integrating TBMD capability through the Standard Missile prime contractor. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 194,565 58,171 96,226 143,295 492,257 Appropriated Value 304,171 Changes to Appropriated Value: a. Restoration of Inflation Reduction 5,877 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 200,442 304,171 194,898 192,073 891,584 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: FY1997 change due to Congressional addition of $246M and various adjustments to the program. Changes in FY97 - 99 reflect congressional language and DoD increases to the program. Schedule: The Navy SM-2/AEGIS/LEAP program was delayed 3-6 months in FY96 in order to transition the executing agent from the BMDO to the Navy; Completion of Navy TBMD COEA has been delayed approximately one year following program restructure in January 1996. The joint system engineering team (JSET) study will be completed in the third quarter of FY98 with a briefing to be presented in the fourth quarter FY98. Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 2263, Navy Area TBMD, PE 0603867C 277,5 65 59,31 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD 2263, Navy Area TBMD, PE 0604867C 0 241,3 30 267,8 22 226,7 48 222,1 45 158,2 71 52,43 3 38,08 9 Cont Cont Standard Missile WPN 1507, BA2 16,27 6 9,151 *15,5 00 *44,6 00 *130, 000 *161, 000 *236, 000 *225, 000 *Cont *Cont * Funds transferred to U. S. Navy D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Transition to Navy as Executing Agent X Control Test Vehicle 1 X Complete Navy TBMD COEA X Third Stage Rocket Motor Test X Control Test Vehicle 2 X Kinetic Warhead Hover Test X Complete Joint System Engineering Study X Control Test Vehicle 3 X Control Test Vehicle 4 X First Flight Intercept Demo 1 (Guidance Test Vehicle) - 2Q/FY2000 A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 a. System Engineering 27,099 65,675 37,621 34,727 b. Program Management 3,818 6,250 5,818 5,818 c. Program Support 4,386 5,825 5,386 5,386 d. Ship System Mods 290 8,450 3,875 3,875 e. Design & Analysis 68,701 75,325 45,117 43,117 f. Hardware Fab & Procurement 51,340 96,675 58,430 60,499 g. Test & Evaluation 5,806 9,900 7,806 7,806 h. Test Equipment 544 4,600 3,300 3,300 I. Engineering Support 3,975 7,500 6,975 6,975 j. Travel 300 300 300 300 k. Software Development 13,795 19,250 18,795 18,795 l. Other/Misc/BMDO 20,388 4,421 1,475 1,475 Total 200,442 304,171 194,898 192,073 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Standard Missile Company CPAF 53,131 84,970 173,75 0 89,754 89,823 TBD 491,42 8 Lockheed Martin CPAF 12,637 16,800 30,575 16,800 16,800 TBD 93,612 NSWC Dalgren WR 6,109 20,239 30,100 11,777 10,034 TBD 78,259 JHU/APL RCP 3,295 9,673 18,650 7,807 6,656 TBD 46,081 Holloman AFB MIPR 8,794 720 1,350 720 720 TBD 12,304 SSI CPFF 1,576 952 1,500 952 952 TBD 5,932 United Defense PD 0 2,675 4,100 2,675 2,675 TBD 12,125 Rockwell CPAF 0 942 1,450 942 942 TBD 4,276 Arnold Eng CPFF 0 300 400 300 300 TBD 1,300 ARC CPFF 0 435 500 435 435 TBD 1,805 TSC CPFF 0 2,150 2,550 2,150 2,150 TBD 9,000 Misc 12,640 2,663 3,750 2,663 2,663 TBD 24,379 BMDO 47,990 37,972 4,421 37,972 37,972 TBD 166,32 7 Support and Management Organizations NSWC Dalgren WR 0 2,000 3,100 2,000 2,000 TBD 9,100 NSWC Port Hueneme WR 0 815 1,250 815 815 TBD 3,695 NAWC China Lake WR 0 1,400 1,675 1,400 1,400 TBD 5,875 NSWC Indian Head RCP 0 2,370 2,600 2,370 2,370 TBD 9,710 VITRO CPFF 2,132 445 550 445 445 TBD 4,017 SPA CPFF 0 500 1,000 500 500 TBD 2,500 JHU/APL CPFF 0 4,153 5,500 4,153 4,153 TBD 17,959 Misc 2,589 1,496 1,900 1,496 1,496 TBD 8,977 Test and Evaluation Organizations NSWC Dalgren WR 0 3,800 4,600 3,800 3,800 TBD 16,000 JHU/APL CPFF 0 400 1,500 400 400 TBD 2,700 SSDC Army MIPR 0 1,276 4,600 1,276 1,276 TBD 8,428 WSMR WR 1,198 50 1,500 50 50 TBD 2,848 Misc 3,909 1,246 1,300 1,246 1,246 TBD 8,947 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 146,17 2 180,49 1 273,09 6 174,94 7 172,12 2 946,82 8 Subtotal Support and Management 4,721 13,179 17,575 13,179 13,179 61,833 Subtotal Test and Evaluation 5,107 6,772 13,500 6,772 6,772 38,923 Total Project 156,00 0 200,44 2 304,17 1 194,89 8 192,07 3 1,047, 584 February 1997 4 - Demonstration and Validation 0603868C Navy Theater Wide TMD