--------------------------------------------------------------------------- PENUMBER: 0603872C PETITLE: Joint Theater Missile Defense COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost Total Program Element (PE) Cost 429,137 506,492 542,619 514,109 544,417 550,196 538,259 520,800 Continuing Continuing 1155 Phenomonology Program 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 37,464 37,300 37,205 36,490 Continuing Continuing 1161 Advanced Sensor Technology 1,270 3,334 3,364 3,208 3,199 3,151 3,148 3,153 Continuing Continuing 1170 TMD Risk Reduction 41,521 23,184 35,267 25,045 24,920 24,803 24,773 24,817 Continuing Continuing 1270 Applied Inert Mats and System Tech Program 9,137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD 1294 UAVBoost Phase Intercept 5,705 930 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD 2160 TMD Existing System Mods 20,401 22,421 12,328 12,957 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD 2259 Israeli Cooperative Project 59,352 43,892 38,715 38,662 38,624 38,591 0 0 TBD TBD 3153 Architecture Analysis / BMC3I Initiatives 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 8,058 8,020 8,011 8,026 Continuing Continuing 3157 Environmental, Siting, and Facilities 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 3,631 3,609 3,606 3,612 Continuing Continuing 3160 TMD Readiness 1,112 1,709 1,730 1,692 1,687 1,676 1,674 1,677 Continuing Continuing 3251 Systems Engineering and Technical Support 45,358 50,909 65,260 62,031 66,972 69,350 90,554 76,498 Continuing Continuing 3261 TMD BM/C3I (BM/C3I Concepts) 0 32,357 34,094 35,864 43,717 44,576 43,210 43,286 Continuing Continuing 3265 User Interface 15,286 14,031 14,680 21,976 22,060 22,113 22,048 22,118 Continuing Continuing 3270 Threat and Countermeasures Program 19,865 21,419 27,986 29,154 27,981 27,891 28,779 27,898 Continuing Continuing 3352 Modeling and Simulations 71,362 64,180 73,173 72,984 74,959 74,961 78,333 75,661 Continuing Continuing 3354 Targets Support 23,046 22,842 27,603 18,721 42,755 42,226 42,463 42,578 Continuing Continuing 3359 System Test and Evaluation 33,568 42,792 40,307 26,444 30,263 32,250 31,590 31,636 Continuing Continuing 3360 Test Resources 31,139 35,507 30,888 30,201 29,942 29,793 30,312 30,363 Continuing Continuing 4000 Operational Support 0 82,876 87,516 84,809 88,185 89,886 92,553 92,987 Continuing Continuing ARCHITECTURE A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Theater Missile Defense (TMD) program's goal is to develop, maintain and deploy a cost- effective, Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty compliant system designed to protect the United States and its Allies against the immediate and growing threat from shorter range theater ballistic missiles. The TMD core programs are PATRIOT Advanced Capability (PAC)-3, Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) System, and Navy Area Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) formerly (Lower Tier) and Navy Theater-Wide TBMD formerly(Upper Tier). Theater Missile Defense programs, projects, and activities in Advanced Development that have as a primary objective the development of technologies capable of supporting systems, components, and architectures that could produce highly effective defenses against theater missile threats. Includes manpower authorizations and the associated costs specifically identified and measured to the performance of these programs. This project is assigned to the Budget Activity and Program Element codes as identified in this descriptive summary in accordance with existing Department of Defense policy. Further justification of the Budget Activity code assigned to each Program Element is contained within the Brief Description of Element section of each Program Element Summary. Acquisition Strategy: See Individual R2 summaries. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 421,185 520,111 557,046 515,855 2,014,19 7 Appropriated Value Adjustments to Appropriated Value: 525,511 a. MEADS below threshold reprogramming -14,125 b. General Reductions (FFRDC, Inflation etc.) -4,872 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 429,137 506,492 542,619 514,109 1,992,35 7 Change Summary Explanation: See Individual R2 summaries. Funding: Schedule: Technical: C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) See Individual R2 summaries. FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost D. Schedule Profile See Individual R2 summaries. FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1155 Phenomonology Program 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 37,464 37,300 37,205 36,490 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project provides the U.S. with the data and predictive tools to generate high confidence target signatures for ballistic missile defenses (BMD). This is a critical adjunct to the evaluation of BMD system performance across the full spectrum of threats and engagement scenarios. This program provides data collection sensors and instruments for use on live-fire missions and analysis of the resulting test data. This program provides predictive models of target signatures in both Radar and Infrared spectrums. This program evaluates and develops algorithms for the critical functions of discrimination, target handover, and aimpoint selection. This program provides for data storage and retrieval of all ballistic missile defense office (BMDO) sponsored tests per statutory requirements. Data Centers and Management. Storage, archival and retrieval of signature related data is provided by the BMDO-funded Missile Defense Data Center (MDDC) and Advanced Missile Signature Center (AMSC). The MDDC is the primary repository of THAAD data. Both the MDDC and AMSC meet the statutory requirements for program data archiving. Data Collection Platforms. This project provides core operating costs for Airborne Surveillance Testbed (AST) target signature collection sensor and platform. Mission costs for AST are provided by using acquisition programs. This project provided FY 96 termination costs for the COBRA EYE sensor. This project monitors other BMDO signature data collection programs to ensure complete coverage and avoid duplication. Analysis, Algorithms, and Modeling. This project performs analysis of radar and optical data on ballistic missile threat signatures and intercept events for the THAAD Radar, THAAD interceptor, and Navy TMD programs. This project develops and evaluates discrimination and kill assessment algorithms for THAAD Radar. This project develops signature models and modeling tools applicable to TMD threat profiles and flight regimes leveraging off investments made in TMD modeling and modeling tools. For analysis this project provides accurate, objective, and timely flight data analysis in support of target signature phenomenology characterization and sensor algorithm development and evaluation. This includes TMD optical sensor data from THAAD, project 1170, project 3270, and others. This project provides post-flight characterizations of expected and unexpected target features. Under the guidance of the Target Signatures Working Group (TSWG) develop target models and provide high fidelity signature sets of THAAD Dem/Val and User Operational Evaluation System UOES targets. Evaluate THAAD software aimpoint selection, discrimination, and handover algorithms against Dem/Val targets and UOES threats. Provide analysis and recommendations for TMD aimpoint selection, discrimination, and sensor handover. For THAAD Radar algorithms this project develops and analyzes algorithms that have the highest payoff potential for the critical functions of detection, tracking, bulk classification, typing, discrimination, target object map generation, aimpoint selection, and kill assessment. Maintenance and upgrades to the simulation facilities required to develop and evaluate these algorithms against real and simulated data is provided for. The Lexington Discrimination System (LDS) will be used to merge radar and optical data analysis on a real-time basis for algorithm development and assessment. Specific tasks include: (1) Use LDS to support development and evaluation of objective system algorithms to be installed on the THAAD Radar, THAAD Interceptor, and Navy TMD programs; (2) Use signature data to identify robust discriminants using field measurements; (3) Develop and deliver individual radar discrimination algorithms based on identified discriminants; (4) Develop, deliver, and exercise on the LDS, algorithms which utilize radar and optical data to facilitate seeker Target Object Map and aim-point selection for THAAD and other TMD systems; and (5) Complete the LDS real- time multiple-sensor, multiple-target handling capability and test TMD algorithms/architectures using this capability. For modeling this project provides high confidence, target and background scene predictions for sensors and BMD systems. These generated scenes are the foundation for high confidence simulations of engagements that cannot or will not be flight tested. The high-fidelity, physics-based models, predicted composite scenes, and associated analytic output developed in this task are evaluated against measured data to ensure confidence in simulation results and provide a reliable route to systems verification and validation. To facilitate this objective, this task also provides crucial data-driven software tools for exploiting measured data and integrating measurements with simulations in support of technology development, test and evaluation, and acquisition efforts. This project also provides for participation in international technical exchange programs in the areas of optical and radar discrimination, reentry, and background and plume phenomenology include: U.S./U.K. Scientific Cooperation Research Exchange (SCORE); use of the UK MESAR Radar; NATO Extended Air Defense (EAD)/TMD Ad Hoc Working Group - Plume Phenomenology Expert Group (U.S., U.K., France, Canada); U.S./French Bilateral Group - Plumes, Backgrounds, and Reentry Signatures; U.S./Israeli TBM Signature and Phenomenology Research; and the U.S./German Phenomenology Research committee. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $6,513 Data Centers and Management: MDDC and AMSC received, archived, and distributed hardbody and plume target signature test data. Provided for required maintenance of hardware for MDDC and AMSC. - $16,255 Data Collection Platform: Provided AST core operating costs to continue optical data collection in support of THAAD flight tests, the TMD Critical Measurements Program (TCMP) campaign, Navy SM-2 Block IVA tests, Combined Experiment Program (CEP/CPX) and Hera target flights. Provided for COBRA JUDY mission planning to support THAAD intercept events, the TCMP campaign, WD, CEP/CPX, and Hera target flights. Provided for termination of COBRA EYE sensor system. - $14,140 Analysis, Algorithms, and Modeling: Developed, refined, and demonstrated active and passive algorithm architectures of multiple targets and single sensors on LDS prototype. Developed multi-sensor data fusion algorithms which perform efficient data resource allocation. Updated integrated background and weather code to include cloud, terrain and UV to RF coverage for modeling and simulation of radar propagation, IR, visible, and laser models. Used LDS to develop and evaluate real-time algorithms for tumbling targets and high resolution imaging in support of THAAD Radar. Performed statistical evaluation of radar/optical discrimination algorithms using field test data. Continued simulation/analysis of TMD Dem/Val optical discrimination and aimpoint algorithms, and finalize prototype algorithms (target selection, aimpoint selection, and kill assessment). Continued to analyze Dem/Val data to support TMD algorithm development. Completed and distribute atmospheric clutter models to TMD system designers. Upgraded signature modeling to incorporate additional TMD threats, modeling of re-entry hardbody break-up, correlated radar-IR ground clutter and capability to merge data with simulations. Developed integrated handover/discrimination information for aimpoint selection using interceptor seeker and integrated radar hardbody and plume signatures for early detection of theater ballistic missiles (TBMs). Developed and provide new release of optical signature modeling with improvements to support optical discrimination algorithms for NMD and TMD intercept capability. Continued participation in international technical exchange programs (U.S./U.K. Scientific Cooperative Research Exchange (SCORE) Program - Target Signatures & Backgrounds Panel and Trials Group, NATO Extended Air Defense (EAD)/TMD Ad Hoc Working Group - Plume Phenomenology Expert Group (U.S., U.K., France, Canada), U.S./French Bilateral Group - Plumes, Backgrounds, and Reentry Signatures, U.S./Israeli TBM Signature and Phenomenology Research, U.S./German Phenomenology Research) in the areas of optical and radar discrimination, reentry, and signature phenomenology. - $36,908 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $5,310 Data Centers and Management: MDDC and AMSC will receive, archive, and distribute missile signature test data. Provide required upgrades to data storage and handling tools. - $9,857 Data Collection Platform: Provide AST core operating costs for continued optical data acquisition of THAAD flight tests, Navy TMD tests, PAC-3 tests, and Willow Dune, TCMP tests. - $16,171 Analysis, Algorithms, and Modeling: Continue radar and optical data analysis support for developmental TMD systems. Increase the capabilities of the LDS to include a scenario visualization tool, an interceptor engagement simulation, and incorporate data into the LDS Field Mission Data Base. Upgrade the LDS physical plant to include upgraded memory and rapid prototyping environments. Complete the LDS real-time multiple target handling capability. Develop and analyze higher order discrimination algorithms using LDS. Upgrade modeling of radar target signatures. Integrate laser signature modeling into the composite modeling framework for radar and infrared signature representations. Deliver validated signature models for high priority engagement scenarios. Continue participation in international technical exchange programs in the areas of optical and radar discrimination, reentry, and background and plume battlespace environment. - $31,338 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $4,695 Data Centers & Management: MDDC and AMSC will receive, archive, and distribute missile signature test data. Provide required upgrades to data storage and handling tools. - $16,585 Data Collection Platform: Provide AST core operating costs to collect optical data of TMD target development flights and intercepts. - $16,555 Analysis, Algorithms, and Modeling: Continue data analysis support for TMD systems in Dem/Val and EMD. Provide support for TMD radar/optical discrimination algorithms and architectures for advanced TMD threats and penaids. Develop real-time algorithms for battlefield learning using neural networks, field data, and simulations on LDS. Develop algorithms for real-time sensor resource allocation to support threat-adaptive algorithm architectures. Deliver validated signature models for high priority engagement scenarios. Continue participation in international technical exchange programs in the areas of optical and radar discrimination, reentry, and signature phenomenology. - $37,835 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $6,256 Data Centers & Management: MDDC and AMSC will receive, archive, and distribute missile signature test data. Provide required upgrades to data storage and handling tools. - $16,557 Data Collection Platform: Provide AST core operating costs to collect optical data of TMD target development flights and intercepts (i.e., THAAD DT, PAC-3 test, etc.) - $15,809 Analysis, Algorithms, and Modeling : Continue data analysis support for TMD systems in Dem/Val and EMD. Continue demonstration of TMD radar/optical discrimination algorithms to finalize EMD algorithms. Demonstrate real-time algorithms for battlefield learning using neural networks, field data, and simulations on LDS. Continue development of real-time sensor algorithms for resource allocation and multi-sensor fusion. Incorporate new field data sets from the transportable radar into the TMD bulk classifiers to adjust parameters for objective system. Maintain and refine signature modeling to run with higher resolution at enhanced computational speed. Deliver validated signature models for high priority engagement scenarios. Continue participation in international technical exchange programs in the areas of optical and radar discrimination, TBM reentry, MESAR tactical trials and signature phenomenology. - $38,622 Total Acquisition Strategy: This project funds data centers, data collection platforms, and algorithm and model development through executing agents in the Air Force (Phillips Laboratory and Arnold Engineering Development Center), Army (Space and Strategic Defense Command), Navy (Naval Research Laboratory) and OSD (Institute for Defense Analysis) via existing contracts. With the executing agents, free and open competitive contracts will be used to the maximum extent possible. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 36,984 41,524 38,988 39,940 157,436 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 144,703 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Decrease in FY97 funds was due to reduction of the AST program to offset part of the higher priority Department unfunded requirement. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 2400 NMD Program, PE 0603871C 730,7 18 828,8 64 504,0 91 393,0 85 309,7 48 309,5 84 391,8 58 392,4 33 Cont Cont 1155 Phenomenology Program, PE 0603173C 2,410 18,30 9 26,74 0 26,20 5 20,40 1 21,20 4 22,39 9 22,92 6 Cont Cont D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Navy Area TBMD (formerly Lower Tier) Deliver software releases (optical/radar discrimination) X CORPS SAM, Sea-based Theater-wide (Upper Tier) - Deliver software releases(algorithms, plumes, backgrounds, optical/radar discrimination algorithms) X Deliver new software releases ( OSC) X X X X X X X X X Support BMDO test flight programs X X X X X X X X TMD-GBR - Deliver software releases (radar discrimination algorithms) X THAAD - Deliver software releases (backgrounds, optical discrimination algorithms) X TMD GBR - Deliver software releases (radar discrimination algorithms) X X Deliver new software releases (SSGM) X X X THAAD - Deliver software releases (background, optical discrimination algorithms) X Upgrade MDDC and AMSC data retrieval and data analysis tools X Initiate BMDO sponsorship of Cobra Gemini system X Cobra Gemini - provide mission planning and data analysis costs A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Prime Contracts 28,329 21,352 27,069 28,631 OGA 2,109 2,109 2,109 2,109 Support Contracts 4,505 5,887 6,763 5,990 Program Management 1,965 1,990 1,894 1,892 Total 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Support and Management Organizations Sverdrop 800 890 910 910 3,510 Teledyne Brown 11,231 7,645 7,598 9,272 35,746 Colsa 923 1,503 1,565 1,560 5,551 Boeing 13,452 6,826 13,932 14,057 48,267 MIT/Lincol n Lab 2,581 2,791 2,343 2,253 9,968 Xontech 1,291 1,596 1,171 1,126 5,184 Nichols Research 711 1,596 1,171 1,126 4,604 Photon Research 2,211 2,810 2,671 2,626 10,318 Soarta 701 1,294 1,211 1,202 4,408 Miscellane ous 3,007 4,387 5,263 4,490 17,147 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development Subtotal Support and Management 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 144,70 3 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 36,908 31,338 37,835 38,622 144,70 3 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1161 Advanced Sensor Technology 1,270 3,334 3,364 3,208 3,199 3,151 3,148 3,153 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The goal of this program is to develop and demonstrate survivability technologies to insure that Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TMD) systems can perform their mission in all required environments. Ballistic missile defenses must be able to operate in nuclear environments and against countermeasure threats. The requirements for the Survivability program are: define, develop and demonstrate Survivability Enhancement Options (SEO) for TMD systems; develop and transfer SEO technology base to research and development centers and laboratories; provide risk reductions to support THAAD Radar Milestone II. This program develops and demonstrates survivability technologies to ensure that TMD elements can perform their mission in all expected hostile threats. Approaches include: studies/analyses; defense suppression threat mitigation technologies development; developing enhanced shelters applying camouflage, concealment and deception (CCD), SEO development; Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) engineering support, survivability/operability demonstrations, development of issue resolution approaches; development of Anti-Radiation Missile (ARM) Countermeasure Evaluator (ACE); and hardened technology integration. ACE combines the desirable effects of low-cost digital simulations and hardware testing of actual ARM hardware in open- and closed-loop simulations. ACE will be used to develop initial ARM Electronic Counter-Countermeasure (ECCM) techniques for THAAD/GBR and PAC-3. The multi-spectral signature of the deployed THAAD Radar system requires application of extensive CCD technologies which have been developed by the Army Labs. Technologies will be available for incorporation into core missile defense systems at Engineering Manufacturing Development (EMD), will provide near-term improvements to existing systems, and will provide necessary risk reduction evidence to support THAAD Radar, and Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) system milestone decisions. This program has developed tools to evaluate THAAD Radar performance under defense suppression threats and in hostile environments. These evaluations support the THAAD Radar Milestone II decisions. The ACE operational capability was demonstrated. Countermeasures for precision guided missiles and cruise missiles continued to be developed. CCD techniques applied to the THAAD Radar were evaluated for effectiveness in battlefield conditions. Requirements for the THAAD Radar to be protected against electromagnetic environmental effects were reviewed and design guidelines were identified. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $1,270 This program has developed tools to evaluate THAAD Radar performance under defense suppression threats and in hostile environments. These evaluations support the THAAD Radar Milestone II decisions. The ACE operational capability was demonstrated. Countermeasures for precision guided missiles and cruise missiles continued to be developed. CCD techniques applied to the THAAD Radar were evaluated for effectiveness in battlefield conditions. Requirements for the THAAD Radar to be protected against electromagnetic environmental effects were reviewed and design guidelines were identified. - $1,270 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $3,334 Conduct ACE evaluation of PATRIOT and MEADS TMD radars against countermeasures. Repaired ACE to allow testing of THAAD radar waveforms. Implement E(3) program and develop NBC guidelines to optimize protection to TMD systems while minimizing cost and weight. Conduct analysis of vulnerability to Precision Guided Munitions (PGM), and analysis of PGM SEO designs. Continued development of TMD survivability technologies in CCD. - $3,334 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $3,364 Develop CCD/technologies for THAAD Radar and THAAD Systems signature management. Utilize ACE for integrated ARM/ECCM evaluation for THAAD Radar. Support THAAD Radar EMD testing. Evaluate THAAD Radar software for survivability. Conduct SEO proof of principle test. Continue environmental model development and enhancements. - $3,364 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $3,208 Demonstrate and validate Pre-Planned Product Improvement SEOs for THAAD radar. Utilize ACE for THAAD/GBR radar evaluation. Multi-spectral decoys for TMD systems. Continue E3 programs.. - $3,208 Total Acquisition Strategy: The survivability technology program supports the tailored and streamlined acquisition strategy employed by the TMD acquisition managers Survivability technologies chosen for evaluation/development will be based on requirements. Within the executing agents, free and open competitive contracts will be used to the maximum extent possible to accomplish specific work packages in accordance with field laboratory acquisition procedures. Contract proposals will be evaluated according to innovative technology approaches, responsiveness to program requirements, quality of proposed deliverables, and cost. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 921 3,531 3,498 3,353 11,303 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 1,270 3,334 3,364 3,208 11,176 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: OSD reduction Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 2260 THAAD System, PE 0603861C 565,8 18 341,3 07 294,6 47 16,77 8 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 ACE eval of GBR X CCD shelter POP X X E3-THAAD Radar susceptibility guide X THAAD Milestone II X CCD SEO test/trades X ACE eval of MEADS X CCD SEO POP X X X X E3 guidelines update X PAC-3 Milestone III X ACE test of BM/C3 SEO suite X SEO design to counter PGM X ARM/ECCM for THAAD Radar X ACE/ECCM for THAAD Radar X Upgrade CCD technologies X SEO integration experiment X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Demonstration & Validation 1270 3334 3364 3208 Total 1,270 3,334 3,364 3,208 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations BDM CPFF 21 Dec 90 431 1000 1000 1000 Cont 3,431 BDM CPFF 0 1127 1159 1003 Cont 3,289 NRC CPFF 14 Feb 92 216 0 0 0 0 216 BAH CPFF 10 Jul 92 175 0 0 0 0 175 TBE CPAF 6 Mar 92 50 0 0 0 0 50 MICOM MIPR Multipl e 0 1000 1000 1000 Cont 3,000 Support and Management Organizations SSDC PMA Multipl e 392 200 200 200 Cont 992 Misc Multipl e 6 7 5 5 Cont 23 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Cont. Support and Management Property Cont. Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 872 3,127 3,159 3,003 10,161 Subtotal Support and Management 398 207 205 205 1,015 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 1,270 3,334 3,364 3,208 11,176 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1170 TMD Risk Reduction 41,521 23,184 35,267 25,045 24,920 24,803 24,773 24,817 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project is the primary BMDO risk mitigation program addressing TMD target/threat signature and the sensor-to-system interface issues for all TMD systems. How potential targets appear to radar and infrared seekers is an important issue which allows TMD acquisition programs to limit costs by concentrating designs on narrow bands of key threat signature characteristics. This project consists of five elements: TMD Critical Measurements Program (TCMP) which builds, flies, observes, and analyzes targets with signature characteristics similar to those anticipated on foreign threats; the Target Signature Measurements Program which observes and directs the analysis of signatures from BMDO test targets (STORM, HERA, etc.) to obtain target signature insights, and which exploits other similar threat signature opportunities; the TMD Seeker Test/Measurements Program which uses an experimental seeker test bed to evaluate emerging missile seeker technologies and to support resolution of unexpected critical problems that emerge during their engineering and testing phases; Kill Assessment Program which investigates the signatures and results of a target intercept; and the Sapphire Statistical Characterization and Risk Reduction (SSCARR) program which determines window/dome reliability and fabrication techniques. In all cases, the target signature data and the analyses address specific questions relating to how a radar first identifies a missile (discrimination), how the radar passes the missile location to a seeker (sensor to seeker handover), how the seeker determines the best place to hit the target (aim point selection), and how the defender can tell if a missile is destroyed (kill assessment). The core sensor costs used in this project to collect target signature data will be provided under projects 1155 and 3360. This project funds the specific sensor tasks for each mission. TMD Critical Measurements Program. This program supports the risk mitigation efforts in TMD signatures. TCMP is a flight test program where threat representative targets are flown at the Kwajalein Missile Range (KMR) or other facilities to observe typical threat-like objects in flight with a sophisticated suite of sensors. These sensors give both target data and representative signature data as seen by TMD system sensors. The TCMP program performs the analysis on the data obtained in these flights. In all cases, the target and threat data and the analysis address the specific areas of discrimination, target object map handover and aim point selection. The hardware, flight instrumentation and data analysis of the TCMP flights are all included in the TCMP budget. TCMP 2 will consist of three medium range flights, in the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year96 and two in the second quarter Fiscal Year97. Kill Assessment. This program is developing the technical basis for the TMD architecture battle management decision kill assessment capability. This capability will enable the battle manager to respond nearly "real-time" following a target intercept engagement to ceasefire, to order a second shot, or to cue the lower tier for appropriate action. This kill assessment capability will also help measure defense system effectiveness and identify threat warhead type. In support of this shoot-look-shoot doctrine, the program is conducting a series of specialized sensor data collections of TMD interceptor tests, follow-on data analysis, and algorithm development. The most challenging aspect is gathering enough pertinent data from various types of intercept scenes to identify and evaluate those observable characteristics serving this decision process. Since opportunities to observe actual TMD missile intercepts are rare, this program will emphasize ground test measurements and construction of analytical models and tools for developing and validating algorithms for the TMD acquisition program. TMD Seeker Test/Measurements: This program provides for the application, integration, and testing of the latest available seeker technologies into on-going TMD seeker designs. The program is divided into two parts; the first supports the Seeker Experimental System (SES) which is used to evaluate missile seeker performance functions and the second is a seeker window sapphire material characterization effort designed to provide a critical database for designers to evaluate seeker window performance in the high temperature, low altitude flight regime. The SES provides BMDO with independent evaluation of emerging seeker technologies in a realistic system context, allowing for risk assessment prior to acquisition commitment. In supporting the solution of technical problems arising in seeker acquisition programs, the SES can address a wide range of design and implementation issues such as hardware/software integration and evaluation of seeker functional algorithms. The sapphire material test activities serve as risk mitigation for Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), Navy Standard Block IVA Missile and the ARROW Programs for improved survivability confidence of the seeker window. Target Signature Measurements. This program funds the per mission costs to acquire data using sophisticated sensor platforms (Airborne Surveillance Testbed, HALO, Sealite Beam Director, etc.) on BMDO interceptor target flights (LANCE, STORM, HERA, etc.). This program also provides the tasking through the Target Signatures Working Group (TSWG) and the funding for each mission to the sensor platforms for each flight. The data collected is utilized by the acquisition programs, the TSWG, and the Targets Program to establish target in-flight signature characteristics for use in hardware development and interceptor algorithm assessment. SSCARR is a joint effort involving the THAAD, Navy SM Block IVA, and ARROW programs. Due to its mechanical strength, high thermal conductivity, and high transparency in the mid-wave infrared, sapphire has become the material of choice for TMD seeker windows and domes. SSCARR employs statistical procedures to determine window/dome reliability for the participating programs. This probability of failure data will allow designers and battle planners to more fully exploit the interceptors’ available battle-space. In addition, diagnostic techniques are being used in an attempt to demonstrate correlation’s between sapphire surface and volume features and “weak” sapphire, thus providing a sapphire screening technique. Potential follow-on activities to SSCARR include a computational fluid dynamics validation effort with emphasis on problems relating to predicting jet interaction effects, an assessment of advanced seeker window technology to remove blur where extreme accuracy in angle-rate measures are required, and an investigation of the utility of reactive materials on hit-to-kill interceptors. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $30,223 Fiscal Year 1996 accomplishments included fabrication and testing of TCMP 2 payload and FASP hardware. Planning for TCMP 3 continued throughout Fiscal Year 1996. A successful July launch of TCMP 2B allowed for extensive data collection and analysis. Preparation and planning for TCMP 3 continued. - $6,145 Upgraded sensor assets to optimize data collections on intercept events, collected intercept data on Marine Corps HAWK-Lance mission. - $2,195 Enhanced and tested Seeker System performance in support of THAAD; continued to support TMD seeker related improvements and used the seeker experimental system for seeker functional testing, initiated sapphire window material tests to improve seeker performance reliability. - $2,958 Collected data to characterize STORM and HERA targets; collect static Radar Cross Section (RCS) data on items, observe Navy flight tests. - $41,521 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $15,144 Conduct TCMP 2A and 2C experimental flight test; analyze, and report test results. Continue TCMP 3 experimental flight test planning for long and mid-range flights to support THAAD EMD and Navy Upper Tier, and to evaluate potential countermeasures and tactics. Purchase and integrate TCMP 3 payload hardware. Expected launch during first quarter Fiscal Year 1999. - $3,353 Continue to collect and analyze sensor data of intercept tests and transfer kill assessment technology to TMD Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPS); evaluate and upgrade, as required, kill assessment algorithm performance. - $2,510 Continue electro-optical infrared support testing of missile seekers with Seeker Experimental System (SES) and complete the sapphire material test program. Continue SSCARR joint effort. - $2,177 Continue target measurements and observe and characterize interceptor targets and flight tests. - $23,184 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $26,131 Purchase boosters and remaining payload hardware for TCMP 3 flights, focusing on countermeasures and longer range threats. Conduct final preparations for TCMP launches. - $6,904 Continue to collect intercept data and to develop the primary kill assessment algorithms for Engineering Manufacturing and Development (EMD) in support of the THAAD Radar system and Navy Theater Wide. - $2,232 Continue target measurements and observe and characterize interceptor targets. - $35,267 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $21,495 Conduct TCMP 3 flight tests, data collection and analysis. Plan and prepare for TCMP 4 experiments. - $3,550 Continue to collect intercept data and test the primary kill assessment algorithms for EMD in support of Navy Upper Tier. - $25,045 Total B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 41,521 22,954 35,267 25,045 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 41,521 23,184 35,267 25,045 125,017 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: The FY97 and FY98 funding was reduced by $13.5M to fund higher priority projects. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 1266, Navy Theater Wide TBMD 0603868C 200,4 42 304,1 71 194,8 98 192,0 73 191,2 29 190,9 30 145,1 90 149,4 44 D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 TCMP Campaign 2B X TCMP Campaign 2A, 2C X TCMP Campaign 3 Planning X Conduct TCMP Campaign 3 X Provide Kill Assessment Algorithms X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Engineering 36,938 21,920 31,170 22,692 Studies 3,013 1,264 4,097 2,353 Support 1,570 0 0 0 Total 41,521 23,184 35,267 25,045 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Multiple Multiple Multipl e 39,938 23,184 35,267 25,045 Cont 123,43 4 Support and Management Organizations SSDC Alloc 1,583 0 0 0 Cont 1,583 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 39,938 23,184 35,267 25,045 123,43 4 Subtotal Support and Management 1,583 1,583 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 41,521 23,184 35,267 25,045 125,01 7 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1270 Applied Inert Mats and System Tech Program 9,137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Atmospheric Interceptor Technology (AIT) Program: The AIT program will develop, integrate and demonstrate the critical technologies for performing hypersonic hit-to-kill intercepts of TBMs within the atmosphere. The demonstrations will validate the solution to critical KKV technologies and will provide: (1) new capabilities with reduced costs/risks compared to current interceptor weapons systems, and enhancements to other interceptors under development; (2) reduction of technical risks and costs in support of acquisition programs through direct technology insertions; and (3) technical solutions to provide theater defense interceptor capabilities for contingencies not currently addressed by the TMD system programs. The program uses existing contracts and technologies currently under development to reduce schedule and cost, and will be planned and conducted with BMDO, Air Force, Navy, and Army elements to make maximum use of existing Service infrastructures. The AIT project will participate in the UAV/BPI Studies (PMA 2259) and the Navy Theater Wide requirements studies. The AIT program has successfully developed and demonstrated critical technologies for hypersonic endoatmospheric kill vehicles that perform hit-to-kill intercepts of TBMs in the atmosphere. A number of cooled window concepts have been developed and demonstrated, prototype strap-down seeker hardware has been developed and tested, and kill vehicle design concepts have been completed. The program will complete prototype seeker hardware and testing, develop a solid propellant divert and attitude control system (DACS), and integrate complete ground and potential flight test hardware. Aero-optical shock tunnel tests were completed on an externally cooled window concept. A downselect to a single prime contractor was conducted in first quarter Fiscal Year 1996. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $9,137 Atmospheric Advanced Interceptor Technology: Continue prototype strapdown seeker validations and tests. Complete downselect to single prime contractor. Conduct cooled window and forebody aero-optical shock tunnel tests. Conduct forebody and airframe vibration tests and field joint validation, and initiate development of solid propellant divert and attitude control system (DACS) components. Continue detailed design of KKV vehicle. - $ - $ - $9,137 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $0 - $ - $ - $0 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $0 - $ - $ - $0 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $0 - $ - $ - $0 Total Acquisition Strategy: The AIMST Project uses U.S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command (USASSDC), DoD and DoE laboratories to fund contractors supported by relevant in-house expertise to meet the AIMST milestones. Weapons systems prime contractors acquire license agreements to use advanced manufacturing/producibility processes (e.g., composite materials, baffles and nozzles) developed by the AIMST Project. International funding (e.g., UK and Japan) and joint agency coalitions (e.g., NASA, DoE and ARPA) are assembled to obtain critical level of effort (e.g., US/UK STRV-2, BMDO/AF/ARPA Smart Structures, US/Japan Composites and superconducting materials programs). The AIT program plan will consist of development and validation of endoatmospheric kill vehicle technologies for potential use in advanced TMD systems, such as advanced NTWD THAAD, MEADS and UAV/BPI; and options for the design, fabrication, and test of the KKVs; options for KKV/booster integration and flight tests. USASSDC will provide technical and contract management of the AIT prime contract. On-going, competitively-awarded, CPFF contracts for the kill vehicle technologies within the AIT program will continue through the completion of ground testing and potential flight tests. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 9,708 0 0 0 9,708 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 9,137 0 0 0 9,137 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Changes in funding resulted in realigning of interceptor & sensor technologies within Projects 1270 and 1161 to better reflect the technologies principle application. The AIT Program was transferred to Project 1270 in FY96 from Project 1265 (BPI), PE 0603870, without funding. Execution of the STRV-2 Program was transferred to Project 1270 starting in FY97. Schedule: Delay in program milestones due to cancellation of BPI program and transfer of AIT Technology development to Project 1270 and other funding reductions. Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 2400 NMD Program PE 0603871C 730,6 56 828,8 64 504,0 91 393,0 85 309,7 48 309,5 84 391,5 85 392,4 33 Cont Cont D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 AIT Downselect to single prime contractor. * COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 1294 UAVBoost Phase Intercept 5,705 930 0 0 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-Based Boost Phase Intercept (BPI) project covers two tasks; Task 1: Cooperative UAV-Based BPI project with Israel, and Task 2: Development of a US UAV-Based BPI Concept. Task 1 is a cooperative U.S./Government of Israel (GOI) BPI program which involves future development and refinement (risk mitigation) of the Israeli Boost Phases Intercept System (IBIS) concept which is planned to destroy tactical ballistic missiles in the boost phase of flight, before engine cutoff, preferably while in enemy territory. This project is based on the use of UAVs armed with on-board interceptors to provide the means of destroying enemy missiles in their boosting phase of flight. The first task of this two-part project will provide risk mitigation in the development of the GOI's UAV BPI. Task 2 of this effort develops a U.S. UAV-based BPI system concept. It will develop the system requirements, to include: kinetic energy interceptors, UAVs, search and track sensors, Battle Management, Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (BMC4I), and the concept of operations (CONOPS) based on readily available U.S. technologies. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $5,705 UAV-based BPI: Developed U.S. requirements and concept for UAV-based kinetic energy BPI. Generated and evaluated U.S. technologies available for a UAV platform, interceptor, and search and track systems. Developed related BMC4I Technologies. Analyzed available UAVs and develop requirements. Developed preliminary CONOPS for a US UAV concept. Worked with the Israelis to develop a cooperative risk mitigation effort in the areas of interceptors, sensors, and BMC4I. - $5,705 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $930 See PE0603870C: Continue the risk mitigation effort with the GOI and initiate interoperability efforts. - $930 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $0 See PE0603870C - $0 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $ Project continuation decision expected in FY98. - $0 Total Acquisition Strategy: This project is risk integration for the ABL program. Task 1 of this PMA is a cooperative US/Government of Israel (GOI) risk mitigation effort addressing further MOAB interceptor development, BMC3I, along with intraconstellation communications. The effort is being done under a firm fixed price contract. The US and GOI share costs. Task 2 is being accomplished by BMDO tri- service Integrated Product Teams (IPT). Additional support is provided by industry. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 9,706 9,296 9,436 0 28,438 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 5,705 930 0 0 6,635 Change Summary Explanation: See PE 0603870C for FY97/98 Funding Funding: Project funding, structure, and objective directed by Congress Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 3359 System Test and Evaluation, PE 0603872C 33,35 5 42,79 2 40,30 7 26,44 4 25,76 3 29,79 3 30,31 2 30,36 3 D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Complete IBIS Follow-On Report X Contract Milestone (Israeli) Risk Mitigation X Preliminary US UAV BPI Concept X Israeli Risk Mitigation Final Report X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 IBIS Systems Engineering US Systems Engineering 5,705 930 Total 5,705 930 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations SMC MIPR Jan 97 157 157 1,350 157 0 0 TBD 1,507 Navy PEO TADB MIPR Jan 97 250 250 2,025 0 TBD 2,025 NAWC MIPR 466 250 0 0 TBD 716 DARPA MIPR 650 0 0 0 TBD 650 Support and Management Organizations WJSA CPFF Apr 96 1,171 523 0 0 TBD 1,694 SSDC MIPR Sep 96 25 0 0 0 TBD 25 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Govt Property FP Jul 18 0 0 0 TBD 18 Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 4,509 407 4,916 Subtotal Support and Management 1,196 523 1,719 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 5,705 930 6,635 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 2160 TMD Existing System Mods 20,401 22,421 12,328 12,957 0 0 0 0 TBD TBD A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project implements non-major defense acquisition program modifications to current and existing warning and surveillance systems that result in fielded improvements to TMD capabilities. This project consists of three programs: Cueing and Netting, SHIELD, and the Extended Airborne Global Launch Evaluator (EAGLE). CUEING AND NETTING. The overarching objective of the cueing and netting task is to enable the US Marine Corps AN/TPS-59 long-range surveillance radar to accept external cues from, and pass cues to, different theater sensors in order to facilitate theater ballistic missile (TBM) identification, location, and tracking. The effort will consist of the development, testing, and operational demonstration of hardware and software improvements to the radar and other supporting systems. SHIELD (Formerly Talon Shield). The SHIELD program is developing a system that receives and fuses Defense Support Program (DSP) assets, other national intelligence data and SIGINT data on theater ballistic missile (TBM) events to provide more timely warning of worldwide TBM launch point, time, azimuth and impact point prediction to tactical units. As processing improvements and additional sources are integrated and fused, these upgraded capabilities are passed to the Air Force Attack and Launch Early Reporting to Theater (ALERT) and the Army Joint Tactical Ground Station (JTAGS) programs for incorporation in the operational systems. The system is co-located at the Joint National Test Facility, Falcon Air Force Base, CO with ALERT. Extended Airborne Global Launch Evaluator (EAGLE). The EAGLE is a Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) and Non-Developmental Item (NDI) program that will field a detection, tracking, and cueing system against TBM. EAGLE will be compatible with any Boeing 707 type or larger class aircraft. The prototype is currently planned for installation in the Air Force E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft. EAGLE represents the integration of several existing technologies into a new sensor suite that will add significant leverage to the overall TBM defense architecture as well as provide significant complementary support to the US and NATO AWACS missions. The principal components of EAGLE are a Wide Area Surveillance Sensor (WASS) from the B-1B program, a High Accuracy Reacquisition Sensor (HARS) from the F-117A Nighthawk program, and a laser range finder from the Navy's Radiant Mist/Outlaw projects. The overall integrator and prime contractor is Boeing in Seattle, Washington. The major sub-contractors are Texas Instruments in Dallas, Texas and Rockwell International of California. International participation is at the second tier sub- contractors. Operationally, the EAGLE system will acquire a boosting TBM and track it until shortly after burnout to establish very precise trajectory, launch point, and impact point estimates. This information will be broadcast as a Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) message which will be used to cue active defense radar, support attack operations against the launchers, and provide improved warning for passive defense. The trajectory cue will enable fire control radar from a variety of interceptor systems to efficiently focus their energy into a single beam allowing acquisition much sooner than normally achievable with autonomous operations. This capability maximizes the defended area footprint as required by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC). EAGLE can greatly improve the defended area against long range theater ballistic missiles versus autonomous operation. In addition, the improved situational awareness provided through BMC3I to the Joint Force Air Component Commander greatly enhances the coordination of the theater air battle and ballistic missile defenses. FY97 Congressional Language mandated that funding be moved from “TMD Existing Systems - EAGLE” to “Airborne Sensor for Ballistic Missile Tracking”. The language also directed the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology {USD (A&T)} provide a plan to congressional defense committees for developing an airborne sensor capability for ballistic missile tracking not later than 19 Jan 97. The language directed that operational user requirements and perspectives and total program cost be given priority consideration in selecting a system to provide this capability. To meet this mandate, the FY97 funds for Task 3 - EAGLE was moved to Task 4 - Airborne Sensor for Ballistic Missile Tracking, the report to Congress written, and program plan developed for the chosen airborne sensor. The EAGLE program will be allowed to proceed at a slower pace due to the funding limitation while the study is conducted and the report written. The Rivet Joint Technology Transfer program will be given initially $400,000 to participate in the study. Depending on the USD (A&T) decision, an airborne sensor may be chosen to proceed through engineering, manufacturing, and development (EMD) and production. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $4,704 SHIELD. Complete SHIELD processor and calibration upgrades; continue to incrementally develop, test and demonstrate added capability of fusing DSP data with other classified sensor data. - $15,600 EAGLE. Finalize the design, commence sensor rapid prototyping; complete modifications to sensor components and integrate sensor subsystems; conduct tests in contractor laboratories to characterize components and subsystems. - $097 EAGLE. Update Air Force Theater Air Command and Control Facility (TACCSF) EAGLE simulation and demonstrate modeling. EAGLE cost analysis of procurement options and studies from simulations in Europe. - $20,401 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $1,393 CUEING AND NETTING. Develop AN/TPS-59 hardware and software modifications to accept and pass an external cue and conduct developmental testing of cueing and netting capability. - $3,808 SHIELD. Continue SHIELD development test and evaluation activities; continue to incrementally develop, test and demonstrate improved processing capabilities and fusion of other intelligence and sensor data sources with DSP. - $93 EAGLE. Complete efforts initiated in FY 1996. Characterize sensor performance under conditions more characteristic of the operational environment against TBM targets of opportunity and surrogate targets prior to prototype integration on the AWACS TS-3 test aircraft. - $17,127 Airborne Sensor for Ballistic Missile Tracking - $22,421 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $1,361 CUEING AND NETTING. Conduct an operational demonstration of the TPS-59 capability to accept and pass an external cue. - $1,815 SHIELD. Continue SHIELD development, test and evaluation activities; continue to incrementally develop test and demonstrate improved processing capabilities and fusion of other intelligence and sensor data sources with DSP. - $9,152 EAGLE. Continue FY 1997 activities; install and integrate the EAGLE prototype sensor aboard the TS-3 aircraft; conduct EAGLE prototype flight testing. - $12,328 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $12,957 EAGLE. Complete prototype testing and pre-EMD activities initiated in FY98. - $12,957 Total B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 20,006 24,166 12,860 13,593 70,625 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 20,401 22,421 12,328 12,957 68,107 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Funding adjustments made to support higher priority projects. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 CUEING AND NETTING Acquisitions milestones X Engineering milestones X X Test and Demos X X X EAGLE Acquisition Milestone Design Review Technical Interchanges X X X X X X X X X X X X Engineering Milestone Component Ground Lab Test X X X X X X X Lab and Field Ground Test X X X Prototype Flight Test X X X Contract Milestone Other Program Events International Participation Negotiations X X X X TALON SHIELD Acquisition Milestones Engineering Milestones Upgrade Reviews X X X X X X X X X X T&E Milestone Test and Demos X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Engineering 18,156 21,223 11,328 12,097 Studies 2,245 1,198 1,000 860 Total 20,401 22,421 12,328 12,957 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations ESC/XR MIPR 15,487 16,680 9,547 12,957 0 54,671 SMC/XR MIPR 4,815 5,648 2,781 0 0 13,244 Support and Management Organizations ESC/XR MIPR 99 93 0 0 0 192 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 20,302 22,328 12,328 12,957 67,915 Subtotal Support and Management 99 93 192 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 20,401 22,421 12,328 12,957 68,107 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 2259 Israeli Cooperative Project 59,352 43,892 38,715 38,662 38,624 38,591 0 0 TBD TBD A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project includes the Arrow Continuation Experiments (ACES) Project, the Arrow Deployability Project (ADP), the Israeli Test Bed (ITB), Israeli Cooperative Research & Development (R&D), and the Israeli System Architecture and Integration (ISA&I) Project. The U.S. derives considerable benefits from its participation in these projects. The primary benefits are in U.S. gains in technology and technical information that will reduce risks in U.S. TMD development programs. The U.S. also benefits from the eventual presence of an anti-ballistic missile defense system in Israel, which provides deterrence of future tactical ballistic missile (TBM) conflicts in that region. This defensive system also contributes to a more robust defensive response should deterrence fail. The Israeli / Arrow program consists of efforts to develop a ballistic missile defense system. It includes the U.S.-Government of Israel (GOI) initiative to assist the GOI development of an anti- tactical ballistic missile (ATBM) interceptor and launcher. The program also includes development of the fire control radar, fire control center and launch control center by the Israelis without U.S. participation. Comprised of three phases, this initiative began with the Arrow Experiments project (Phase I) that developed the preprototype Arrow I interceptor. The ACES project (Phase II) is a continuation of Phase I, and consists of critical lethality tests using the Arrow II interceptor upgraded development and test of the Arrow II interceptor. Arrow provides the basis for an informed GOI engineering and manufacturing decision for an ATBM defense capability. If successful, the Arrow II will satisfy the Israeli requirement for an interceptor for defense of military assets and population centers and will support U.S. technology base requirements for new advanced anti-tactical ballistic missile technologies that could be incorporated into the U.S. theater missile defense (TMD) systems. The third phase is the ADP which began in Fiscal Year 1996. This phase of the project will pursue the research and development of technologies associated with the deployment of the Arrow Weapon System (AWS) and will permit the GOI to make a decision regarding deployment (without financial participation by the U.S. beyond the R&D stage). This effort will include system-level flight tests of the U.S.-Israeli cooperatively developed Arrow II interceptor supported by the Israeli-developed fire control radar, fire control center and launcher control center (LCC). An interface will be developed for AWS interoperability with U.S. TMD systems. Lethality, kill assessment and producibility will continue to be assessed. Subsequent U.S.-Israeli cooperative R&D on other ballistic missile defense concepts may occur in the future. The ITB Program is a medium-to-high fidelity theater missile defense simulation that provides the capability to evaluate potential Israeli missile defenses, aids the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) in the decision of which defense systems to field, provides insights into command and control in TMD, and trains personnel to function in a TMD environment. A structured set of joint U.S./Israeli experiments is being executed to evaluate the role of missile defenses in both mature and contingency Middle East theater operations. This funding also provides for a portion of the operation and maintenance of the ITB and for planned enhancements. Completed experiments identified additional enhancements needed to improve the ITB as an analysis tool. The enhancements incorporated in the ITB to date include radar and weapons models, and a BPI simulation capability. The BPI enhancement benefited the Israeli BPI study completed in January 1996. The planned Adaptive Battle Management Center (ABMC) enhancement will benefit the U.S. by enabling the ITB to simulate a wide variety of command and control and interoperability issues. The Israeli Cooperative R&D program supports the advancement of emerging TMD technologies. This support will advance the technology demonstration phase which will provide for the defense of the State of Israel. It further supports the U.S. technology base needs for these technologies, and furthers the pursuit of interoperability with U.S. TBMD systems. This task supports efforts in developing an interface to allow for interoperability between Israeli TMD systems and U.S. TBMD systems and the implementation of such a system. The ISA&I tasks provide ongoing analysis and assessment of the baseline, evolutionary, and responsive threats to support the definition and evaluation of an initial Israeli Reference Missile Architecture (IRMA), a baseline missile configuration. Evolutionary growth paths to enhance the IRMA robustness against future threats will be identified. Critical TMD system architecture issues and technologies will be analyzed, and the conformance to established requirements of various Israeli anti-tactical ballistic missile (ATBM) programs, including the Arrow missile development activity, the ADP, and the ITB will be conducted. Finally, previously developed simulations and models will be used selectively to address significant TMD issues. Collectively, the tasks conducted under this cooperatively sponsored ISA&I project will provide critical insights and technical data to both the U.S. and Israeli governments for improving near-term and evolutionary defenses against ballistic missile threats. Since program initiation in 1988, Israel successfully improved the performance of its pre-prototype Arrow I interceptor to the point that it achieved a successful intercept and target destruction in June 1994. Arrow II design and component testing progressed to the successful demonstration of the new warhead, electro-optical seeker, radar fuse, first stage booster, sustainer booster, launcher canister, and launcher. The ADP International Agreement was signed in March 1996 and Presidential certification was completed in May 1996. The ITB became operational in the second quarter of FY 1992. The ITB experiments validated the performance of the prospective near-term Israel Theater Missile Defense System. It provided valuable insight into the potential role of Human-In-The-Loop (HIL) for a TMD system. Also, the Test bed Product Office at the Space and Strategic Defense Command benefited from the application of ITB Project experience to the U.S. and United Kingdom Extended Air Defense Test Bed (EADTB) Projects. The ISA&I Project activities demonstrated that defense of the State of Israel from tactical ballistic missile (TBM) attacks is feasible and cost-effective. The ISA&I effort analyzed and addressed numerous TMD system issues including HIL, resource allocation, and threat analysis. The U.S. benefited from the architecture analysis work, including identification and progress toward resolution of critical TMD system issues such as kill assessment and the lethality study of a novel interceptor warhead. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $31,493 Completed Arrow Continuation Experiments (ACES) and Support. Completed Arrow II interceptor design, development and fabrication. Initiate Arrow II interceptor flight tests. Continued to transfer Arrow data for risk reduction in the THAAD and SM-2 Block IVA programs. Developed and used high fidelity seeker models to analyze seeker performance. - $24,075 Arrow Deployability Project and Support. Program implementation of procurement of long lead items. Conducted interoperability studies. - $1,911 ITB. Awarded contract for continuation of ITB effort. Initiated Adaptive Battle Management Center enhancements. - $1,666 ISA&I. Analyzed technical issues associated with TMD system performance including Kill Assessment and Lethality. Evaluated the performance of the near-term TMD against near-term and evolutionary threats. Awarded follow-on contract modification. Continued architecture analysis work for near term and future threats. - $207 Cooperative R&D. Identified and assessed key technologies. Assessed technologies and interoperability. - $59,352 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $1,701 ACES Support. Complete lethality analysis of Arrow II. Evaluate Arrow II performance against surrogate threat High Explosive and bulk chemical warhead targets. Complete analysis of Arrow II flight test data. Provide Arrow II flight data to U.S. TMD interceptor developers. - $38,653 Arrow Deployability Project and Support. Begin production of Arrow II UOES and targets. Evaluate Arrow interoperability with other TMD systems. Evaluate expected Arrow Weapon System (AWS) test performance. Provide AWS test plans and flight data to U.S. TMD developers. - $1,898 ITB. Complete Adaptive Battle Management Center enhancements. Conduct experiments on near-term improvements to the TMD system. Continue HIL experiments - $1,498 ISA&I. Provide independent oversight and assessment of near-term TMD system to include capability conformance with operational requirements and test plan traceability with operational specifications. Conduct architecture effectiveness/cost/risk trade study to examine evolution from near-term TMD system. - $142 Gov Project Personnel & Support. Provide project support for USASSDC personnel. - $43,892 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $35,184 Arrow Deployability Project and Support. Continue AWS integrated flight tests. Evaluate U.S. and Arrow components for electro-magnetic interference. Transfer the results of the AWS tests to U.S. TMD interceptor developers. Continue interoperability, lethality, kill assessment and producibility studies. Develop an US/Israeli Interoperability Capability. - $1,894 Continue experiments on near-term improvements to the TMD system and on deployability. Provide improved threat model and Arrow II update enhancements. - $1,495 ISA&I. Analyze results of ITB Interoperability experiments. Continue evaluations of the performance of the near-term TMD system based on ADP system engineering flight tests. Continue analysis of TMD refinements for future threats. - $142 Gov Project Personnel & Support. Provide project support for USASSDC personnel. - $38,715 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $35,137 Arrow Deployability Project and Support. Conduct Benefits Review to determine future ADP plans. Continue AWS integrated flight tests. Continue transfer of the AWS test results to U.S. TMD systems. Continue interoperability, lethality, kill assessment and producibility studies. - $1,891 Complete experiments on near-term improvements to the TMD system and on deployability. Provide improved threat model and Arrow II update enhancements. Conduct joint US/IS experiments. - $1,493 Continue to analyze results of ITB Interoperability experiments. Continue performance evaluations of the near-term TMD system based on ADP system engineering flight tests. Continue analysis of TMD refinements for future threats. - $141 Gov Project Personnel & Support. Provide project support for USASSDC personnel. - $38,662 Total Acquisition Strategy: This is a cooperative U.S./GOI development program. By completing the Arrow Deployability Project, U.S. TMD programs will be afforded state-of-the-art technical data for program risk reduction and the GOI will have developed information to make a sound Arrow Weapon System deployment decision. The planned ISA&I and ITB efforts will continue to refine the operational tactics and techniques of the fielded near-term TMD system. The IBIS will provide requirements and concept of operations needed for further acquisition strategy development. The U.S. and the GOI, under the umbrella of the various Memoranda of Agreements, share project costs. The U.S. share of total funding is based upon the maturity of the development. Each contract associated with the individual projects is a firm-fixed price (FFP) contract. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 52,906 37,180 37,874 37,402 165,362 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 59,352 43,892 38,715 38,662 180,621 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: The FY1997 Congressional Appropriation contained an additional $2.7M for the Israeli Cooperative Programs. The program was reduced by $46K in Department of Defense-Wide RDT&E reductions. Negotiations for an extended ADP reduced the Cooperative R&D budget after the U.S.- GOI agreement to cap Israeli Cooperative programs at $40M per year starting in FY1998. Inflation reductions impacted FY1998 and beyond to levels below the $40M per year specified in the US/Israel Memorandum of Agreement (Kaminski-Eilam). Schedule: Out of six flight tests planned in FY96, three occurred in FY96, and three will occur in FY97. Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 3359 - System Test & Evaluation, PE 603872C 33,56 8 42,79 2 40,30 7 26,44 4 25,76 3 27,75 0 27,09 0 27,13 6 Cont Cont D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 U.S./Israel ADP Agreement signed X Complete Arrow Interceptor Development X Complete ITB Enhancements X X X X Complete six Arrow II Flight Tests (ACES) X Initiate Arrow Weapon System Flight Tests X Initiate Interoperability Requirements X Interoperability Tests X X X X U.S. Benefits Review X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Prime Contract (Israel Ministry of Defense) 19950 33,000 33,000 33,000 Other U.S. Government Activities 3975 5,647 2,173 2,121 US Government Flight Test 31493 1,703 0 0 Software Development 1911 1,900 1,900 1,900 Systems Engineering 1666 1,500 1,500 1,500 Miscellaneous 357 142 142 141 Total 59,352 43,892 38,715 38,662 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Support and Management Organizations Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development Subtotal Support and Management Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 3153 Architecture Analysis / BMC3I Initiatives 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 8,058 8,020 8,011 8,026 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project, which began in FY95, supports two offices within BMDO to ensure that appropriate issues relating to system architecture and Battle Management/Command, Control, and Communications (BM/C3) are addressed in a coordinated and synergistic manner across all BMDO National Missile Defense (NMD) and Theater Missile Defense (TMD) efforts. The offices of Architecture Integrator and the BM/C3 Office report directly and independently to the BMDO Director to provide the necessary mission-area oversight of critical BMDO technical issues. In this project, BMDO supports systems analysis work to determine the expected operational performance and effectiveness of missile defense systems under development. Computer simulation models are developed and used to investigate architecture and system level capability and to resolve critical technical issues related to the development of specific elements of the architecture. Tradeoffs in alternative elements, specific designs, inventory and integration of systems are conducted in detail to determine the most cost effective approach for a particular missile defense mission. The work is performed on a continuing basis in order to determine the impact of changing threats, mission requirements, and advances in technology. The project provides BMDO with an independent assessment of the expected effectiveness of major programs under development and requirements for supporting technology. The work is separated into two program elements, one for TMD and the other for NMD. In this program element the focus is on TMD systems and technology. The primary thrust of the work is to show, through analysis, the need for and the expected performance of different defense systems under development to handle current and projected missile threats, both ballistic and cruise. Issues such as warhead lethality, system degradation in a severe countermeasure environment, target handover from tracking sensor to missile seeker, effects of netting sensors, etc. are some of the technical issues addressed in this project. Future BM/C3 activities in this project will provide for the mission-area oversight and coordination of all BMDO BM/C3 development and acquisition activities. This effort will provide for the synergistic evaluation of relevant BM/C3 technical issues; the formulation of appropriate plans, programs, and policies to facilitate the coordination of all BMD Advanced Development BM/C3 research, development, and acquisition activities across TMD and NMD program activities; promote appropriate reuse strategies to maximize BMD reuse capabilities; and minimize the duplication of BM/C3 research and development efforts across all NMD and TMD development efforts. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $5,707 Architecture Analysis: Performed analyses of architectures and systems using new (validated) simulation tools. Conducted 3 month study (PROGRUS III) to determine impact of any change in threat, requirements, or development programs on the TMD architecture. Analyzed unresolved technical issues identified in the TMD COEA Study. Determined the ability of TMD systems to respond to proposed countermeasures. Studied active defense in the context of overall defenses including passive and counterforce options. Evaluate the capability of potential Russian and Allied missile defense systems with TMD systems. - $4,031 BM/C3 Initiatives: Provided the mission-area capability to address emerging BM/C3 system requirements and concerns and facilitate their resolution in a synergistic manner across all TMD and NMD development efforts. Defined TMD and NMD BM/C3 development process requirements to facilitate the translation of operational BM/C3 requirements to joint and combined interoperable systems. Coordinated BMDO participation in the analysis, development, and implementation of various BMDO, DoD, Allied, and other Government and commercial initiatives relating to BMDO TMD/NMD BM/C3 development. Developed a concise definition of BM/C3 and a simple description of its components, relative to TMD/NMD/Theater Air Defense (TAD) architectures. Developed a Cost Analysis Requirements Document (CARD) type document to support cost and investment analysis. - $9,738 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $4,591 Architecture Analysis: Conduct annual program update study (PROGRUS IV). Continue systems analysis of architecture/system performance and related technical issues as directed by the BMDO Architecture Integrator and the Deputy for Acquisition/TMD. - $2,208 BM/C3 Initiatives: Provide BMDO system-level capability to address emerging BM/C3 system requirements and concerns in a synergistic manner across all NMD and TMD development efforts and facilitate the translation of operational BM/C3 requirements to joint and combined interoperable systems. Coordinate BMDO participation in the analysis, development, and implementation of various BMDO, DoD, Allied, and other Government and commercial initiatives relating to BMDO NMD/TMD BM/C3 development. - $6,799 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $5,295 Architecture Analysis: Conduct annual program update study (PROGRUS IV). Continue systems analysis of architecture/system performance and related technical issues as directed by the BMDO Architecture Integrator and the Deputy for Acquisition/TMD - $2,978 BM/C3 Initiatives: Provide BMDO system-level capability to address emerging BM/C3 system requirements and concerns in a synergistic manner across all NMD and TMD development efforts and facilitate the translation of operational BM/C3 requirements to joint and combined interoperable systems. Coordinate BMDO participation in the analysis, development, and implementation of various BMDO, DoD, Allied, and other Government and commercial initiatives relating to BMDO NMD/TMD BM/C3 development. - $8,273 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $5,182 Architecture Analysis: Conduct annual program update study (PROGRUS IV). Continue systems analysis of architecture/system performance and related technical issues as directed by the BMDO Architecture Integrator and the Deputy for Acquisition/TMD. - $2,917 BM/C3 Initiatives: Provide BMDO system-level capability to address emerging BM/C3 system requirements and concerns in a synergistic manner across all NMD and TMD development efforts and facilitate the translation of operational BM/C3 requirements to joint and combined interoperable systems. Coordinate BMDO participation in the analysis, development, and implementation of various BMDO, DoD, Allied, and other Government and commercial initiatives relating to BMDO NMD/TMD BM/C3 development. - $8,099 Total Acquisition Strategy: Systems analysis work in this project is contracted. In November 1995, a two year competitive contract for this work (with two, one year extension options) was awarded to a ten-member corporate team led by SPARTA, Inc., Laguna Hills, Calif. For BM/C3 Initiatives efforts, expertise of Government, Federally Funded Research & Development Center (FFRDC), System Engineering and Integration Contractor (SEIC), and Scientific, Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) personnel are leveraged in the execution of project activities, using existing contracts to the maximum extent possible. Specifically, U.S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command (USASSDC) and USAF/Electronic Systems Center (ESC) Government and contractor personnel lead Information Architecture and development efforts; SETA and SEIC contracts provide the core of technical expertise for a variety of BM/C3 activities; and Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) contract vehicles provide state-of-the-art technical expertise in Software Engineering and related technical areas. Additional contractor services will be procured if needed to meet emerging program requirements B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 8,876 8,062 8,629 8,496 Continui ng Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 Continui ng Change Summary Explanation: Funding: None Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 2400 NMD Program, PE 0603871C 730,6 56 828,8 64 504,0 91 393,0 85 309,7 48 309,5 84 391,8 58 392,4 33 Cont Cont D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Define BM/C3 elements X Assess TMD/NMD/TAD Architectures X Assess Global Command and Control System (GCCS) Interoperability in support of the Technical Architecture X Develop Commander-in- Chief (CINC)/User BM/C3 Feedback Plan in support of the Technical Architecture X Establish BMD BM/C3 CARD like document X Establish Technical Architecture X BM/C3 Policy Update X X X X Quarterly Program Review X X X X X X X X X Annual Contract Program Review X X X X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Support Contracts 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 Total 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Support and Management Organizations SETA CPFF/CPA F 27 Dec 94 BMDO 2,916 1,750 2,500 2,500 contin uing 9,666 Other Support Cont Multipl e 6,822 5,049 5,773 5,599 contin uing 23,243 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development Subtotal Support and Management 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 32,909 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 9,738 6,799 8,273 8,099 32,909 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 3157 Environmental, Siting, and Facilities 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 3,631 3,609 3,606 3,612 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Provides environmental program guidance, environmental impact analyses and documentation, real property facility siting, acquisition, and facility operational support for the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) Theater Missile Defense (TMD) system. Plans, programs, budgets, and oversees facility acquisition through the Military Construction (MILCON) and RDT&E construction programs. Provides guidance and supports BMDO TMD Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Statement process, environmental compliance, pollution prevention, and other environmental efforts for TMD activities. Develops guidance for Executing Agents on facilities, siting, acquisition, and environmental matters. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $3,378 Supported TMD programs with siting analyses, basing deployment plans, environmental analyses and documentation, environmental compliance and pollution prevention programs, and test range studies. TMD systems being emphasized are the PATRIOT Advance Capability Level 3 (PAC-3), Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), Navy Lower Tier (Area) systems and Family of Systems System Integration Tests. - $77 Conducted facility planning and developed preliminary facility design concepts for TMD test and evaluation facilities, and for deployment locations. - $914 Executed and managed TMD's FY 96-98 MILCON, Minor MILCON, and RDT&E facility design, construction projects, and related activities. The emphasis is on the PAC-3 and THAAD EMD test and deployment facilities, such as THAAD Test Facilities at USAKA, TMD Target Launch Facilities at Wake Island and Fort Wingate, and THAAD 1st Objective Battalion Facilities at Fort Bliss. - $4,369 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $1,878 Support TMD programs with siting analyses, basing deployment plans, environmental analyses and documentation, environmental compliance and pollution prevention programs, and test range studies. The project covers costs associated with maturing acquisition programs, fielding of systems, integrated system testing, and test and evaluation programs. - $144 Continues facility planning for fielding the PAC-3 and THAAD systems. It also continues facility planning support for test and evaluation programs. - $3,915 Provides funds to execute and manage TMD's FY 97-99 MILCON, Minor MILCON, and RDT&E facility design, construction projects and other related activities providing program support. Design projects include: the THAAD Test Facilities at USAKA, Facility Upgrades at Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF), Utilities Repairs at Wake Island , Extended Range Target Launch Complex facilities, and possible Air Launch facilities in the Pacific. Construction projects include PAC-3, THAAD, and Navy Lower Tier (Area) facility projects, such as: TMD Target Launch Facilities at Wake Island and Fort Wingate, and construction of THAAD 1st Objective Battalion Facilities at Fort Bliss. - $35 OSD and SBIR Reductions - $5,972 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $1,784 Support TMD programs with siting analyses, basing deployment plans, environmental analyses and documentation, environmental compliance and pollution prevention programs, and test range studies. Begin work on the System Integrated Tests requirements development and continue on the Navy Lower Tier (Area), THAAD and PAC-3 systems. The program manages activities associated with maturing acquisition programs, fielding of systems, integrated system tests, and test and evaluation programs. - $62 Complete facility planning for PAC-3 and THAAD facilities. Begin planning and development of unique range test facilities for both Atlantic and Pacific requirements. Complete planning for the FY00 and FY01 System Integration Tests. - $1,754 Provides funds to execute overall FY98-00 MILCON, Minor MILCON, and RDT&E facility design, construction projects and related activities. Construction projects include: THAAD Test Facilities at USAKA, Utilities Repairs at Wake Island, and Facility Upgrades at PMRF. Continual improvements to TMD's test and evaluation facilities are required to support the ever increasing complexity of test scenarios. Initial requirements to meet improvements to PAC-3, THAAD and Navy Lower Tier (Area) system will enter the design phase. - $3,600 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $1,800 Support TMD programs with siting analyses, basing deployment plans, environmental analyses and documentation, environmental compliance and pollution prevention programs, and test range studies. Work continues on new TMD requirements as well as on Navy Lower Tier (Area), Navy Upper Tier (Theater Wide), THAAD, and PAC-3 systems to meet their requirements. The program manages activities associated with maturing acquisition programs, fielding of systems, integrated system tests, and test and evaluation programs. - $63 Complete facility planning for PAC-3 and THAAD basic system facilities. Continue planning and development of unique range test facilities for both Atlantic and Pacific requirements as well as follow-on improvements to THAAD and the Navy Upper Tier (Theater Wide) systems. Complete planning for the FY00 and FY02 System Integration Tests. - $1,777 Provides funds to execute overall FY98-00 MILCON, Minor MILCON, and RDT&E design and construction. The design emphasis will be on completing facility requirements for PAC-3. Provides for TMD test and evaluation facilities improvements to support increasingly complex test scenarios. Final requirements to meet improvements to PAC- 3, THAAD and Navy Lower Tier (Area) system will enter the design phase. The construction emphasis will be on the Facility Upgrades at PMRF. - $3,640 Total Acquisition Strategy: BMDO is assisted by executing agents in the Army, Navy, Air Force and contractor support. They provide technical assistance of facilities, siting, and environmental activities. The U.S. Army Space and Strategic Defense Command, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Army Program Executive Office-Missile Defense and Navy PEO Theater Air Defense provide specific additional technical assistance in delivering the Facilities, Siting, and Environmental documentation products needed for program execution. BMDO tasks the Services through Program Management Agreements to perform the required tasks in support of the TMD program. BMDO performs quarterly on-site reviews to verify and validate completed tasks. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 3,399 3,768 3,754 3,818 14,739 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 17,581 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Funding adjustments in FY97 made to support additional environmental analysis requirements. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost 3157 Minor MILCON & Design, Joint TMD Dem/Val, PE 0603872C 1,642 1,404 1,965 1,885 1,444 341 1,643 1,650 Cont. Cont D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 PAC-3 and THAAD Target Launch Facilities, Ft Wingate and Wake Island X X X X PAC-3 Missile Assembly Bldg, White Sands Missile Range X X X X X X THAAD Test Facilities, Kwajalein Atoll X X X X X X X X X THAAD 1st Objective Battalion, Ft Bliss X X X X X X Manage Environmental Analysis for Eglin Gulf Test Range X X X X X X X X Manage Environmental Analysis for Pacific Missile Range Facility X X X X X X X X X X Manage Environmental Analysis for Alternate Air Launch X X X X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Environmental, Siting & Facilities 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 Total 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations AF/SMC PMA FY96 25 10 10 10 Cont. 55 Huntsville Corps of Engr MIPR FY95 167 130 130 130 Cont. 557 Navy Civil Engr/Envir on Staff CPFF FY94 27 50 50 50 Cont. 177 Pac Ocean Div Corp of Engr MIPR FY97 0 1,600 0 0 Cont. 1,600 USASSDC CPFF FY96 125 0 279 588 Cont. 992 Fish & Wildlife Service MIPR FY92 6 30 0 0 Cont. 36 WSMR Environ Staff MIPR FY96 225 175 0 0 Cont. 400 MICOM-RDEC MIPR FY96 25 25 25 25 Cont. 100 PEO-AMD- TSD-Civil PMA FY96 30 30 30 30 Cont. 120 Support and Management Organizations SETA (SSDC) CPFF FY97 488 450 445 445 Cont. 1,828 PEO-AMD- TSD Support CPFF FY95 167 130 130 130 Cont. 557 MEVATEC CPFF FY96 100 100 100 100 Cont. 400 USASSDC Environ. Support CPFF FY94 983 1,929 1,078 757 Cont. 4,747 Navy Environ. Support CPFF FY97 0 275 274 280 Cont. 829 SETA (BMDO) CPFF FY95 2,001 1,038 1,049 1,095 Cont. 5,183 Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development 630 2,050 524 833 4,037 Subtotal Support and Management 3,739 3,922 3,076 2,807 13,544 Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project 4,369 5,972 3,600 3,640 17,581 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 3160 TMD Readiness 1,112 1,709 1,730 1,692 1,687 1,676 1,674 1,677 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project supports Theater Missile Defense projects in the functional areas of manufacturing, logistics supportability and metrology design and support. These diverse functions map directly into meeting operational suitability and affordability goals. By focusing on all TMD (BMD) activities and coordinating these efforts between the Services and projects, common cost avoidance is realized. TMD readiness activities include producibility and planning for manufacturing, acquisition logistics, metrology, and training. The efforts will concentrate on identifying and analyzing critical TMD systems level deployment, support, producibility and manufacturing (P&M) risks, industrial base capability issues and developing mitigation plans for these areas to ensure operational requirements and BMDO affordability objectives are met. In addition, TMD operational suitability and availability advances and lessons learned are applied to NMD projects. This effort will also focus on the identification of critical TMD metrology requirements; and the development of national/DOD measurement standards and calibration support for TMD technology and acquisition programs. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $723 Completed development of Long Wave Infrared (LWIR) transfer standard detectors. Continued National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) support of THAAD Radar antenna calibration and field diagnostics. Continued development of IR standards for detectors, sources, optical materials characterization, and focal plane arrays (FPA). Continued to support the TMD program offices, their contractors, Government laboratories and test centers with Infrared (IR) calibration and measurement services. - $349 Integrated producibility issues. Resolved TMD system common support and producibility problems. Developed mitigation strategies (both element specific and TMD wide). Reviewed manufacturing planning. - $40 Updated operational suitability planning, to address issues related to TMD concepts of operations, BM/C3, inter-Service operations, and systems readiness and functional requirements. - $1,112 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $808 Complete the NIST medium background IR calibration facility. Continue development of IR standards for MWIR detectors, focal plane array testing, and IR filter measurements. Continue NIST support of THAAD Radar antenna field diagnostics and calibration. Continue to support the TMD program offices, their contractors, Government laboratories and test centers with IR calibration and measurement services. - $485 Support completion and insertion of producibility and manufacturing mitigation programs developed in FY95 and 96, including non-BMDO programs. Support element program offices in risk mitigation development and assessment. - $416 Update operational suitability planning, to address issues related to TMD concepts of operations, BM/C3, inter-Service operations, and systems readiness and functional requirements. - $1,709 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $820 Complete Medium Wave Infrared (MWIR) detector transfer standard and standards for IR filter spectral measurements. Continue development of standards for testing IR focal plane arrays and IR scene projections. Continue NIST support of THAAD. Continue to support the TMD program offices, their contractors, Government laboratories and test centers with IR calibration and measurement services. - $490 Continue insertion of producibility and manufacturing mitigation programs from FY97, including non-BMDO programs; support producibility and manufacturing aspects of PATRIOT Advanced Capability Level 3 (PAC-3) and Sea-based Area TBMD milestones. Support element program offices in development of exit criteria resolution and assessment. - $420 Update operational suitability planning, to address issues related to TMD concepts of operations, BM/C3, inter-Service operations, and systems readiness and functional requirements. Complete plans for the transition of system management of current TMD acquisition programs from BMDO to the Services. - $1,730 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $811 Continue MWIR/LWIR detector transfer standard and standards for IR filter spectral measurements. Continue development of standards for testing IR focal plane arrays and IR scene projections. Continue NIST support of THAAD. Continue to support the TMD program offices, their contractors, Government laboratories and test centers with IR calibration and measurement services. - $461 Continue insertion of producibility and manufacturing mitigation programs from FY97, including non-BMDO programs; support producibility and manufacturing aspects of PAC-3 and Sea-based Area TBMD milestones. Support element program offices in development of exit criteria resolution and assessment. - $420 Update operational suitability planning, to address issues related to TMD concepts of operations, BM/C3, inter-Service operations, and systems readiness and functional requirements. Complete plans for the transition of system management of current TMD acquisition programs from BMDO to the Services. - $1,692 Total Acquisition Strategy: a. Efforts to develop and implement metrology standards will be executed by the NIST. BMDO funding will be administered by the AF Metrology Center in Newark OH. The AF Metrology Center staff also have the responsibility of helping BMDO identify metrology needs and implementing and distributing developed standards through-out US industry. b. Efforts in producibility and manufacturing , industrial base analyses, and operational suitability will be worked through a series of government managed working groups and IPTs. Efforts may be executed by BMDO SETAs, Service Industrial base Analyses organizations, Service training and planning organizations. Unless a significant, multi-year effort is required on a particular issue, these areas will be worked via MIPRs to services and by funding tasks with existing BMDO and service SETAs. These limited funds will go to the organization with the expertise on a topic -by-topic basis. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 1,106 1,822 1,805 1,776 6,509 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 1,112 1,709 1,730 1,692 6,243 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: None Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 IR and improved IR dynamic range spectral calibration services are provided throughout other milestones (TBD) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Integrated Logistics Support 1,112 1,709 1,739 1,692 Total 1,112 1,709 1,739 1,692 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Support and Management Organizations Test and Evaluation Organizations B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development Subtotal Support and Management Subtotal Test and Evaluation Total Project COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 3251 Systems Engineering and Technical Support 45,358 50,909 65,260 62,031 66,972 69,350 90,554 76,498 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification This project provides system engineering and technical support for the integration of Service- supplied weapon systems to facilitate the identification and resolution of inter-Service integration and interoperability issues; technical and engineering assessments and trade-off studies of Theater Missile Defense (TMD) system architectures and concepts; support for UK developed sensor data fusion methodology; Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system survivability oversight and assessment; risk reduction and acquisition streamlining support; modeling, simulation, experiment, and flight test support; development and maintenance of technical and programmatic databases; and preparation of technical reports, briefings, and programmatic documentation associated with TMD studies and critical issues. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $2,470 Supported completion of a UK developed concept of operations test bed. Support continued in the testing and fielding of the UK developed Target Oriented Tracking System (TOTS). - $9,775 Provided scientific, engineering, and technical support for the acquisition, integration, and fielding of TMD systems including: reviewed products in comparison to standards, specifications, and requirements; provided modeling and simulation support of architecture analyses and trade-off studies; installed and completed operational configuration of the BMDO node of the Extended Air Defense Test Bed (EADTB); continued analytic and programmatic support of the TMD Capstone Cost and Operational Effectiveness Analysis (COEA); provided risk reduction and acquisition streamlining support; provided engineering and technical support for international programs and BM/C3 efforts; developed and maintained technical and programmatic databases; and prepared technical reports, briefings, and programmatic documentation. - $814 Provided support to WALEX, THAAD, HAWK and TMD Conference - $13,856 Using Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) resources, performed independent technical and engineering assessments of TMD system architectures including: system concept development and assessment; COEA support; critical element technical and programmatic assessments including trade-off analyses; reviews of mandated documents, international cooperative programs, and treaty implications; multi-Service and allied BM/C3 integration; modeling, simulation, experiment and flight test support; integration of fielded components into operational units; specific studies and analyses of critical issues. - $3,728 Provided technical support to the TMD COEA, individual system COEAs, and congressionally-directed studies. - $9,596 Provided minimum-level system engineering and integration support at the TMD system level to include the following efforts: continued to identify inter-Service integration interfaces; prepared engineering documents that identify changes required in theater air defense C3I systems to incorporate TBMD; updated TMD Integrated Test Plan; updated system description documents; completed TMD integration trade studies; and planned, coordinated, and analyzed C2 wargames for CINC CONOPS development. - $1,794 Provided continued support to intra-Service integration, interoperability, and resolution of interface issues; supported review of SEI contractor integration and assessment documentation; evaluated threat-generated requirements; initiated environmental modeling and simulation tool improvements; continued refinement of Survivability Enhancement Options (SEOs) for BM/C3; supported the EADTB effort and supported the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) effort. - $1,500 Provided technical support to Combat Developments Directorate-Ft Bliss, TX. - $100 Supported BMDO services (e.g., security, contracting, supplies). - $1,374 Supported BMDO operations and personnel management. - $351 Provided personnel management support to Program Executive Officer, Missile Defense, Huntsville, AL. - $45,358 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $1,107 Continue UK sensor data fusion efforts including Target Oriented Tracking System (TOTS) integration testing and development and testing of TOTS applications. Begin use of TOTS in test analysis at various BMD test ranges. - $442 Provide support to TMD conference, HAWK and Marine Corps combat development support. - $8,953 Provide scientific, engineering, and technical support for the acquisition, integration, and fielding of TMD systems including: review of products in comparison to standards, specifications, and requirements; modeling and simulation support of architecture analyses and trade-off studies; risk reduction and acquisition streamlining support; engineering and technical support for international programs and BM/C3 efforts; conduct EADTB distributed analyses and operations; development and maintenance of technical and programmatic databases; and preparation of technical reports, briefings, and programmatic documentation. - $13,781 Using FFRDC resources, perform independent technical and engineering assessments of TMD system architectures including: system concept development and assessment; critical element technical and programmatic assessments including trade-off analyses; reviews of mandated documents, international cooperative programs, and treaty implications; multi-Service and allied BM/C3 integration; modeling, simulation, experiment and flight test support; integration of fielded components into operational units; and specific studies and analyses of critical issues. - $1,879 Provide technical support to the TMD Joint Effectiveness Analysis (JEA), individual system JEAs, and congressionally directed studies. - $11,695 Increase system engineering and integration support at the TMD system level. Continue to identify inter-Service integration interfaces; prepare engineering documents to identify changes required in theater air defense C3I systems to support TBMD; update TMD Integrated Test Plan; update system description documents; and plan, coordinate, and analyze C2 wargames for CINC CONOPS development. - $4,608 Provide support to Service integration, interoperability, and resolution of interface issues; determine adequacy of threshold/objective hardness specifications for C4I support equipment; identify SEOs for C4I/support equipment to meet/exceed identified exposure levels to ensure critical operational effectiveness; continue environmental modeling and simulation tool improvements; assist in coordinating technology infusion to support pre-planned product improvements; continue support to TMD program offices in refining software development practices and mitigating technical, cost, and schedule risks across BMD/TMD software development, integration, testing, and maintenance efforts. - $300 Support for BMDO services (e.g., security, contracting, supplies). - $466 Support for Blue Team Analysis to study counter-countermeasures to TMD system. - $1,999 Provide technical support to Combat Developments Directorate-Ft Bliss, TX. - $5,458 Support BMDO operations and personnel management. - $221 Provided personnel management support to Program Executive Officer, Missile Defense, Huntsville, AL. - $50,909 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $1,134 Continue utilization of TOTS at US BMD test ranges. - $13,915 Provide scientific, engineering, and technical support for the acquisition, integration, and fielding of TMD systems including: review of products in comparison to standards, specifications, and requirements; modeling and simulation support of architecture analyses and trade-off studies; risk reduction and acquisition streamlining support; engineering and technical support for international programs and BM/C3 efforts; conduct Extended Air Defense Testbed (EADTB) distributed analyses and operations; development and maintenance of technical and programmatic databases; and preparation of technical reports, briefings, and programmatic documentation. - $14,030 Using FFRDC resources, perform independent technical and engineering assessments of TMD system architectures including: system concept development and assessment; critical element technical and programmatic assessments including trade-off analyses; reviews of mandated documents, international cooperative programs, and treaty implications; multi-Service and allied BM/C3 integration; modeling, simulation, experiment and flight test support; integration of fielded components into operational units; and specific studies and analyses of critical issues. - $3,986 Provide technical support to the TMD JEA, individual system JEAs, and congressionally- directed studies. - $19,038 Increase system engineering and integration support at the TMD system level. Continue to identify inter-Service integration interfaces; prepare engineering documents to identify changes required in theater air defense C3I systems to support TBMD; update TMD Integrated Test Plan; update system description documents; and plan, coordinate, and analyze C2 wargames for CINC CONOPS development. - $5,575 Provide support to Service integration, interoperability, and resolution of interface issues; determine adequacy of threshold/objective hardness specifications for C4I support equipment; identify SEOs for C4I/support equipment to meet/exceed identified exposure levels to ensure critical operational effectiveness; continue environmental modeling and simulation tool improvements; assist in coordinating technology infusion to support pre-planned product improvements; continue support to TMD program offices in refining software development practices and mitigating technical, cost, and schedule risks across BMD/TMD software development, integration, testing, and maintenance efforts. - $409 Support for BMDO services (e.g., security, contracting, supplies). - $1,000 Support for Blue Team Analysis to study counter-countermeasures to TMD system. - $5,817 Support BMDO operations and personnel management. - $356 Provided personnel management support to Program Executive Officer, Missile Defense, Huntsville, AL. - $65,260 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $1,113 Continue utilization of TOTS at US BMD test ranges. - $14,263 Provide Scientific, Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) support of TMD systems acquisition. - $14,250 Using FFRDC resources, perform independent and technical engineering assessment and studies to support fielding TMD systems. - $2,257 Provide technical support to congressional directed studies (e.g. JEA). - $5,314 Inter-Service Integration Efforts. - $315 Technical Support for BMDO services. - $950 Support Blue Team analysis to study counter-countermeasures to TMD systems. - $17,234 SEI Contract, system software and engineering, and TMD system survivability. - $5,970 Support BMDO operations and personnel management. - $365 Provided personnel management support to Program Executive Officer, Missile Defense, Huntsville, AL. - $62,031 Total Acquisition Strategy: This project uses a combination of FFRDC, competitively awarded SETA contracts, and a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the United Kingdom Ministry of Defense. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 47,919 55,669 67,892 60,858 232,338 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 45,358 50,909 65,260 62,031 223,558 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Funding transferred to higher priority projects. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Engineering Milestone T&E Milestone Tech Demo Milestone Contract Milestone - Deliver TMD Sys RD X X X X - Deliver TMD Sys Assessment Doc X X X X - Deliver TMD Int Test Plan X X X X - Deliver TMD C3I Int Assessment X X X X - Deliver TMD Surv Assessment X X X X - TMD BMC3 WG Plan/Exec X X X X X X X X - TIBS/TRAP Msg Int X X X X BMDO EADTB Node Development - Node IOC X - Full distributed Operations X X X Support through delivery of integration engineering analysis the following TMD events: - Navy Area TBMD Def COEA comp X - Navy Area TBMD Defense MS II X - THAAD Flight Test X X X X - Complete NATO Mag Set Tests X - TMD-GBR Target Tests X X - PAC-3 CDR X - BPI PDR X - C3I Integration Test X X X - System Integration Test X X X - THAAD MS II X - PAC-3 LRIP Decision X - BPI KKV CDR X - MEADS SRR X - Navy Theater-wide Informed Decision X - Navy Theater-wide TBMD MS I X - BPI Integration Tests X - THAAD UCT X - UOES Delivery X - PAC-3 MS III X - MEADS MS II/III X A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Developmental Test & Evaluation 2,470 1,107 1,134 1,113 Program Management Support 29,134 25,821 33,340 32,035 Systems Engineering 10,529 16,303 24,613 22,548 Program Management Personnel 3,225 7,678 6,173 6,335 Total 45,358 50,909 65,260 62,031 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands) Performing Organizations: Contractor or Government Performing Activity Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Perfor ming Activi ty EAC Projec t Office EAC Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Organizations Support and Management Organizations SETA CPAF Nov 96 9,775 8,953 13,915 14,263 ONGOING 46,906 Other Supt. Cont. Multipl e 28,094 28,563 38,463 35,006 ONGOING 130,126 OGA’s MIPR Multipl e 5,019 12,286 11,748 11,649 ONGOING 40,702 Test and Evaluation Organizations DT&E 2,470 1,107 1,134 1,113 ONGOING 5,824 B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands) Government Furnished Property: Item Description Contract Method/T ype or Funding Vehicle Award or Obligat ion Date Delivery Date Total Prior to FY 1996 Budget FY 1996 Budget FY 1997 Budget FY 1998 Budget FY 1999 Budget to Comple te Total Progra m Product Development Property Support and Management Property Test and Evaluation Property Subtotal Product Development Subtotal Support and Management 42,888 49,802 64,126 60,918 217,73 4 Subtotal Test and Evaluation 2,470 1,107 1,134 1,113 5,824 Total Project 45,358 50,909 65,260 62,031 223,55 8 COST ($ In Thousands) FY 1996 Actual FY 1997 Estimate FY 1998 Estimate FY 1999 Estimate FY 2000 Estimate FY 2001 Estimate FY 2002 Estimate FY 2003 Estimate Cost to Complete Total Cost 3261 TMD BM/C3I (BM/C3I Concepts) 0 32,357 34,094 35,864 43,717 44,576 43,210 43,286 Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The primary mission of this project is to provide the warfighter with an integrated and interoperable Theater Missile Defense (TMD) Battle Management/Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (BM/C3I) capability having the flexibility to meet a wide range of threats and expected needs. The BM/C3I architecture for TMD is built upon the existing command and control (C2) structure for Theater Air Defense (TAD) and adds the communications linking TMD C2 nodes, weapons, and sensors, and the TMD interfaces to intelligence systems and other supporting capabilities. The BMDO, from its joint perspective, uses this project to oversee independent weapon systems development and to provide guidance, standards, equipment, integration, and analysis to maximize the performance of a multitude of sensors, interceptors, and C2 nodes and to synergize their individual contributions to an integrated Joint theater-wide TMD system. BMDO has three major thrusts to the TMD BM/C3I integration program. The first thrust establishes the links and means for receipt of and in-theater dissemination of early warning and launch warning information from space-based and intelligence systems external to TMD. This project supports the system engineering of their capability and prototype development of items such as improved displays for early in-theater warning information. This project focuses on linking separate external systems into the theater. The second thrust of the BM/C3I program focuses on communication and interoperability among TMD weapon systems. Interoperability includes both the communications equipment, and protocols as well as the common command and control procedures among different weapons systems to ensure a truly integrated theater-wide ballistic missile defense system. The cornerstone of TMD interoperability is the Joint Data Net (JDN) which uses the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) and the Tactical Data Information Link-JTIDS (TADIL-J) message format. This project integrates JTIDS terminals into existing Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) C2 platforms and provides the necessary software upgrades. This funding is critical for timely inter-Service interoperabiltiy. The third thrust of the BM/C3I program directs attention to upgrades of Service C2 centers. Various command center upgrades are included in this project to reduce decision-making time necessary to effectively engage ballistic missiles. Again, BMDO leverages off several existing Service-funded theater air defense command center upgrades and this project funds only the specific TMD-related aspects of these upgrades. BMDO's central direction and support of hardware and software developments will produce an integrated C2 capability for TMD. The joint warfighters and BM/C3I developers evaluate the effects of early warning, improved interoperability, integration, and command center upgrades on joint TBMD doctrine through BM/C3I work shops and analysis. All of the efforts in this project are designed to provide a seamless interoperable architecture to provide timely warning and information necessary to reduce decision times and allow more opportunities to efficiently and effectively engage hostile missiles. The end result will kill more missiles and will reduce casualties to U.S. and other friendly forces. FY 1996 ($ in Thousands): - $0 There is no funding under this project in this PE for FY96. This project was transferred from PE 0603864 per Congressional Direction. - $0 Total FY 1997 ($ in Thousands): - $5,390 BM/C3I Integration - Army: Integrate JTIDS into Army systems; develop terminal initialization parameters; demonstrate enclave interoperability; integrate User Operational Evaluation System (UOES) upper/lower tier; continue TMD Cell/TOC automation. - $14,515 BM/C3I Integration - Air Force: Continue JTIDS integration efforts, initiate integration into two additional existing platforms; Air Operations Center/Command Reporting Center (AOC/CRC) upgrades for TMD; begin development of JTIDS Range Extension (JRE) capability. - $5,400 BM/C3I Integration - USMC: Complete development of AN/TPS-59 cue acceptance software; commence development of TAOM BM/C3I TMD software. - $283 BM/C3I Integration - Navy: Support joint development of JTIDS Range Extension (JRE). - $4,394 BM/C3I Integration - Joint/Combined: Obtain/approve additional TADIL-J TMD messages; transition MIDS development to the Army; conduct evaluations of JTIDS networks to determine value of JTIDS Time Slot Reallocation (TSR); begin software integration of TMD messages; obtain NATO approval of additional TADIL-J messages; perform an integrated engineering analysis for the joint composite tracking network (JCTN) including the cooperative engagement capability. - $2,375 BM/C3I Integration - Joint National Test Facility (JNTF): Conduct TMD BMC3I work shop; conduct C2 tests to refine C2 procedures; deploy joint TMD planning capability to command centers for initial user testing. - $32,357 Total FY 1998 ($ in Thousands): - $9,995 BM/C3I Integration - Army: Field two Tactical Operations Centers (TOC) to active Army brigades; support JTIDS Range Extension (JRE) efforts; participate in JTIDS network management activities; initiate Joint TMD Planner (JTMDP) integration into Army host platforms. - $12,654 BM/C3I Integration - Air Force: Develop an automated intelligence database function; continue JTIDS platform integration; initiate one additional platform; continue JRE development; technology development of distributed battle management; and validate TMD battlefield situation display software. - $291 BM/C3I Integration - Navy: Continue support of joint development of JRE. - $2,500 BM/C3I Integration - USMC: Complete testing of AN/TPS-59 cue capability; and continue TAOM BMC3I software development. - $6,098 BM/C3I Integration - Joint/Combined: Update TADIL-J message set approval and initiate definition and development of joint composite tracking network (JCTN). - $2,556 BM/C3I Integration - JNTF: Continue BMC3I work shops; update Joint TMD Planner (JTMDP) based on initial user test results; and provide Global Command and Control System (GCCS) capability for TMD applications evaluations. - $34,094 Total FY 1999 ($ in Thousands): - $7,916 BM/C3I Integration - Army: Continue integration of THAAD EMD and Navy TMD systems into brigade TOC planner; continue JRE support. - $11,701 BM/C3I Integration - Air Force: Start JTIDS TMD integration to AOC; continue installation on AWACS, test integration on Airborne Battlefield Command and Control Center (ABCCC); perform TMD BSD SW modification to AOC; upgrade Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace (IPB) GCCS decision support tool; continue JRE development. - $290 BM/C3I Integration - Navy: Continue support of JRE - $13,666 BM/C3I Integration - Joint: Continue JCTN development and update TMD TADIL message sets. - $2,291 BM/C3I Integration - JNTF: Continue BM/C3I work shops; perform user assessments of TMD GCCS TMD applications; and identify product improvements to the JTMDP. - $35,864 Total Acquisition Strategy: The 3261 Project acquisition strategy leverages existing system acquisition programs (which are subject to milestone decisions and testing) and accomplishes supporting tasks to satisfy BM/C3I performance requirements. A significant portion of this project entails systems engineering of separately funded and managed service programs so that all systems will interoperate when fielded. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands) FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 Total Cost Previous President’s Budget 0 31,388 36,562 39,018 106,968 Current Budget Submit/President’s Budget 0 32,357 34,094 35,864 102,315 Change Summary Explanation: Funding: Congressional direction eliminated the TMD BM/C3I program elements 0603864/0604864C and placed this project under the Joint TMD activities program element. Consistent with this direction, a determination was made that this program is more appropriately funded with Dem/Val funds. Navy tasks directly supporting the Navy Area TBMD program were deleted from this project for FY1997 and beyond, and funded under the Navy Area TBMD program element (Project 2263) to unify control. Additional FY1997 funds were authorized and appropriated for cooperative engagement capability (CEC) integration. This will be addressed in an integrated engineering analysis for the joint composite tracking network. In FY1997, Project 3261 was cut to pay various PBD reductions including those for COBRA JUDY and MEADS. In FY1997-2003, Project 3261 was cut as part of a reallocation of BMDO funds to support the JNTF. Schedule: None Technical: None C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) While this program is not dependent upon funding from other programs, it supports other programs by providing capstone systems engineering, common BM/C3I guidance, government furnished equipment, interface support, joint network design analysis, and other actions necessary to achieve interoperability among independent systems. FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Compl Total Cost D. Schedule Profile FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Engineering Milestone Data link handbook published (Army) X TMD software