COST ($ In Thousands)

FY 1996 Actual

FY 1997 Estimate

FY 1998 Estimate

FY 1999 Estimate

FY 2000 Estimate

FY 2001 Estimate

FY 2002 Estimate

FY 2003 Estimate

Cost to Complete

Total Cost

Total Program Element (PE) Cost

 

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

Air Force Theater Missile Defense (TMD) is focused in three areas: Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) enhancements; Improvements to existing Attack Operations systems; and the development of the Airborne Laser. PE028060F is primarily concerned with C4I and Attack Operations as part of the Air Force focus in TMD, but also addresses some initial BMC4I studies and analysis for the Airborne Laser (ABL) technology program. AF TMD concentrates on defining improvements to existing operational capabilities, developing and evaluating prototypes, demonstrating as well as simulating modifications during operational concept demonstrations, and coordinating the transition of these capabilities to operational systems. C4I improvements contribute greatly to the overall effectiveness of TMD systems developed by each of the Services and the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (Patriot, THAAD, etc.). C4I enhancements improve our ability to assess, target, plan and task attackers to counter Theater Missile (TM) threats. The C4I program encompasses JTIDS TMD Upgrades (including, for example, TMD Message Set Integration and JTIDS Range Extension), Distributed Battle Management, Operations Decision Tools (Time Critical Target Aid (TCTA), Defensive Planning Module (DPM), and Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA)), Intel Support Systems (Intel Support Concept and Real Time Intel Tools) and integration of these systems within the Air Force and among the Services. Attack Operations focuses on improving the ability to locate, identify, target and destroy theater missiles and supporting infrastructure, including theater missile threats in production, deployment, prior to and during launch, as well as soon after launch before critical mobile targets are able to egress to hide locations. The foundation for Attack Operations is improved C4I and automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) upgrades to one or more airborne platforms (Joint STARS, F-15E, Rivet Joint, U-2). The Air Force program is based upon taking our defense against the growing theater missile threat to the enemy by making near-term modifications to existing theater assets. The TMD program seeks to improve existing operational capability, evaluate and demonstrate prototypes, as well as simulate and demonstrate modifications during operational concept demonstrations.

 

(U) Acquisition Strategy: HQ ASC provides the program management for the concept exploration of TMD Attack Operations. ASC conducts lab demonstrations with Wright Labs and support Concept of Operations (CONOPS) development and requirements definition by analyzing and demonstrating measures of effectiveness for various sensor improvements and cueing schemes. HQ ESC provides program management for the concept exploration of C4I enhancements. Prototypes and analysis of improvements to existing C4I assets will complement the Attack Operations effort with combined participation in Operational Concept Demonstrations. These Attack Operations and C4I analyses and demonstrations are specifically targeted against operational deficiencies identified in the TMD Mission Area Plan (MAP), are traceable to the AF and JROC Mission Need Statement (MNS) and are consistent with the Air Force and Joint TMD CONOPS and in accordance with Joint Doctrine. Integration of TMD requirements and fielding of proposed material solutions will continue beyond concept exploration in the appropriate program element for a particular system. For example, the TMD demonstration and requirements analysis for F-15E ATC/R may transition into a F-15E Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) and P3I project within the F-15E program element. Existing contracts will be used for those systems where engineering change proposals are appropriate. Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis (SETA) contracts will be used to support the requirements definition phase of TMD improvements. In those areas where new material solutions are necessary to correct a deficiency, the source selection process will be followed to establish a new contract.

 

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

 

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

Total

Cost

(U) Previous President’s Budget

24230

22285

45134

45713

TBD

(U) Appropriated Value

25102

31285

   

TBD

(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value

 

     

a. Congressional General Reductions

-679

-700

     

b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)

         

c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram

         

d. Below Threshold Reprogramming

-17

       

e. Rescissions

-347

       

(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB

 

+9000

-15952

-14031

 

(U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1997 President’s Budget

24059

30585

29182

31682

TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY97 plus-up for UH-1N Simulator integration into the TACCSF simulation environment. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E, deletion of the Active Defense Decision Aid (ADDA), and deletion of an early airborne prototype for Distributed Battle Management (DBM). These programs were deleted to fund higher priority AF programs.

Schedule: The deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E from this PE will delay implementation of a datalink capability in air to ground aircraft until the planned integration under the F-15E program (after FY00). An Airborne Distributed Battle Management prototype will be delayed until FY00/01, when DBM is integrated into Theater Air Control System (TACS) C2 nodes.

Technical: N/A

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A

 

(U) D. Schedule Profile

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

(U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance)

       

 

X

X

   

X

       

X

(U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototypes/Contingency Support Systems

             

X

               

(U) TACCSF

     

X

     

X

               

(U) Intel Support Systems: ISC updates; Syria, Iran, and Iraq, and automation of country studies

     

X

     

X

     

X

     

X

(U) TMD TACS systems requirements (JTIDS message upgrades, decision aids & planning tools)

   

X

     

X

   

X

       

X

(U) Ops Concept Demonstrations

   

X

     

X

     

X

     

X

 

 

COST ($ In Thousands)

FY 1996 Actual

FY 1997 Estimate

FY 1998 Estimate

FY 1999 Estimate

FY 2000 Estimate

FY 2001 Estimate

FY 2002 Estimate

FY 2003 Estimate

Cost to Complete

Total Cost

4478

Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements

12,167

21,860

21,162

23,588

21,749

24,150

17,838

14,026

TBD

Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

C4I enhancements are needed to reduce the battle management and command & control timelines associated with the theater missile threat. The C4I program includes:

1) Operations and maintenance of the Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF);

2) Procurement of four MCE/TPS-75 prototypes with expert missile tracker (EMT) and correlator capability;

3) Intel Support Systems which include the development and revision of the Intel Support Concept (ISC), digitization of the country studies and development of processes and tools for automated application of TMD Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace (IPB);

4) JTIDS TMD upgrades which are the development and integration of TMD messages into JTIDS host platforms and the extension of JTIDS beyond line of sight;

5) Operations Decision Support Tools which include the integration of the Time Critical Target Aid into TBM Core Systems (TBMCS) architecture, the development and migration of the Defensive Planning Module into TBMCS, and initiating the development of the Attack Operations Decision Aid.

6) Distributed Battle Management concept, which enhances the forward execution capabilities of the TACS to counter the short timeline of time critical targets. This includes the development, integration and test of the DBM capability on an airborne platform. The program will leverage off the capabilities of the current ground Combat Integration Capability (CIC) program which integrates and fuses various intelligence and surveillance feeds to provide the Joint Force Commander (JFC)/Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) with an effective battle management capability.

 

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $5200

Continued support for Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF) operations for C4I simulation and analysis

  • (U) $3817

Continued missile tracker prototype acquisition for MCE/TPS-75

  • (U) $650

Intel Support Systems--Developed processes and tools for automatic production of digitized TMD Intel Prep of the Battlefield (IPB) information.

  • (U) $2500

TMD JTIDS message integration into CRC, Rivet Joint, and Cobra Ball; JTIDS Range Extension concept implementation; Development of TCTA and Defensive Planning Module (DPM) and began design for Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS) integration; started Distributed Battle Management (DBM) analysis and design.

  • (U) $12,167

Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $14900

Complete TACCSF operations support for C4I simulation and analysis; begin incorporation of simulator link to UH-1N SOF simulator.

  • (U) $3000

Complete MCE/TPS-75 missile tracker and correlator capability with final delivery.

  • (U) $1300

Intel Support Systems - Update Intelligence Support Concept (ISC); Complete development of tool for automatic application of digitized TMD IPB information and transition into Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS).

  • (U) $2660

JTIDS TMD message integration into JSTARS, ABCCC and AOC; Complete JTIDS Range Extension performance and cost analysis; Continue development of TCTA (DIS compatible) and DPM V1.0 and transition to TBMCS; Complete DBM trade and analysis/platform impacts and CONOPS validation; Investigate procedures and advanced technology for Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA).

  • (U) $21,860

Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $2717

Integrate IPB Tool and release with TBMCS; Adapt IPB tool for Air Intelligence Agency’s Virtual Production environment; Demonstrate automated procedures and system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations, CINC experiments and Joint Exercises.

  • (U) $11045

Continue to integrate JTIDS TMD message sets into JTIDS host platforms; Begin JTIDS Range Extension implementation; Establish Airborne DBM development environment and DBM unique prototyping/technology development.

  • (U) $7400

Integrate DPM V2.0 and TCTA (ground targeting) and release with TBMCS; Begin AODA prototype/technology development. Explore use of promising planning tools, C2 decision aids, communication and computer processing improvements, sensor fusion technology and sensor upgrade impacts to BMC4I Theater Missile Defense connectivity.

  • (U) $21,162

Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $4350

Continue to adapt the IPB tool for Air Intelligence Agency’s Virtual Production environment; Demonstrate improved automated procedures and IPB system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations (OCDs), CINC experiments and Joint Exercises.

  • (U) $8860

JTIDS/Link-16 Integration: Complete integration of JTIDS/Link-16 TMD message sets onto major C2 nodes; Continue JTIDS Range Extension implementation.

  • (U) $10378

Operations Decision Support Tools - Upgrade DPM (deployment planner), continue to explore BMC4I/sensor improvements that compress Theater Missile engagement timelines and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. Begin DBM platform upgrades: battle management, target nomination and communication improvements; Complete AODA prototype/technology development and design for CIC integration.

  • (U) $23,588

Total

 

 

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

 

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

Total

Cost

(U) Previous President’s Budget

12059

13374

26713

27086

TBD

(U) Appropriated Value

12590

13374

   

TBD

(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value

     

a. Congressional General Reductions

-304

-514

     

b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR)

         

c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram

       

d. Below Threshold Reprogramming

         

e. Rescissions

-119

       

(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB

 

+9000

-5551

-3498

 

(U) Current Budget Submit/98 PB

12167

21860

21162

23588

TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: FY97 plus-up for integration of UH-1N Simulator into the TACCSF simulation environment. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Active Defense Decision Aid (ADDA), and deletion of an early airborne prototype for Distributed Battle Management (DBM). These programs were deleted to fund higher priority AF programs.

Schedule: An airborne Distributed Battle Management prototype will be delayed until FY00/01, when DBM is integrated into Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS).

Technical: N/A

(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A

 

 

(U) D. Schedule Profile: See page 3.

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

                       
 

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

(U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototypes/Contingency Support Systems

             

X

X

             

(U)TACCSF

     

X

     

X

               

(U) Intel Support Systems: ISC updates; Syria, Iran, and Iraq, and automation of country studies

     

X

     

X

     

X

     

X

(U) TMD TACS systems requirements (JTIDS message upgrades, decision aids & planning tools)

   

X

     

X

   

X

     

X

 

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($0 in Thousands)

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

(U) TACCSF

5100

14900

0

0

(U) Intelligence Support Systems (ISC/Automated IPB)

650

1300

2717

4350

(U) MCE/TPS-75 Missile Tracking System

3709

3000

0

0

(U) JTIDS/Link-16 Integration & Beyond LOS Capability

1000

520

8645

8860

(U) Distributed Battle Management (DBM)

1100

300

2400

6378

(U) Operations Decision Support Tools (planning tools, decision aids, C4I processing and sensor fusion technologies)

608

1840

7400

4000

(U) Total

12,167

21,860

21,162

23,588

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($0 in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

 

Budget

FY 1996

 

Budget

FY 1997

 

Budget

FY 1998

 

Budget

FY 1999

 

Budget to Complete

 

Total Program

 

Product Development Organizations

Martin Marietta

(TACCSF)

FFP

Oct 95

 

ACCDRA

9100

4700

14900

0

0

TBD

28,700

North/Grumman

(TPS-75)

FFP

Oct 95

 

ESC/AVT

 

2069

2142

0

0

TBD

4,211

Zeltech/SPARTAPSR/BETAC (IPB)

T&M

May 96

 

ACC/INX

500

837

830

2294

3693

TBD

8,154

Logicon (DBM)

T&M

May 96

 

ESC/XRS

 

1131

0

2038

5397

TBD

8,566

Alphatech (DPM)

T&M

Mar 95

 

ESC/XRS

 

500

840

3736

849

TBD

5,925

Motorola (TCTA)

T&M

Mar 96

 

ESC/XRS

 

500

885

849

0

TBD

2,234

North/Grm (MSI) AODA-For Profit Contractor

T&M

TBD

Nov 96

Oct 97

 

ESC/JSX

ESC/XRS

0

0

0

0

170

1189

1698

425

2547

TBD

TBD

1,784

Lock/Mart (MSI)

T&M

Mar 97

 

ESC/XRS

   

50

0

0

TBD

50

MASC

JRE-For Profit Contractor

TBD

TBD

Nov 96

Oct 97

 

ESC/XRS

ESC/XRS

0

0

0

0

200

0

0

6151

0

7098

TBD

TBD

200

Support and Management Organizations

FFRDC

       

1605

1395

975

1784

1992

TBD

7,751

Non-FFRDC

       

1935

1035

534

892

996

TBD

5,392

HQ ESC

       

2251

0

334

531

591

TBD

3,707

Test and Evaluation Organizations

TBD

                 

 
                       

Total Project

       

15391

12167

21860

21162

23588

TBD

TBD

COST ($ In Thousands)

FY 1996 Actual

FY 1997 Estimate

FY 1998 Estimate

FY 1999 Estimate

FY 2000 Estimate

FY 2001 Estimate

FY 2002 Estimate

FY 2003 Estimate

Cost to Complete

Total Cost

4479

Attack Operations Concept Development

11,892

8,725

8,020

8,094

8,581

9,169

10,463

10,951

TBD

Continuing

(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

Improvements in Attack Operations are based on the ability to locate, identify, and destroy theater missiles, their launchers, and associated infrastructure on the ground. In addition to the enhancements to C4I, the Attack Operations Project focuses on advanced sensor and target identification capabilities, CONOPS and requirements development for TMD offensive counter-air and their optimized integration with defensive systems. Specific technologies such as automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) and moving target indicator/track (MTI/T) upgrades to Joint STARS, F-15E and potentially the U-2, F-16 and UAVs are to be analyzed using constructive analysis and evaluated through Technology/Operational Concept Demonstrations and CINC Experiments along with command and control connectivity upgrades critical to their optimum employment against time-critical targets. Effectiveness and affordability parameters defined will be used in support of follow on acquisition decisions involving P3I upgrades to existing weapon systems and potential new start programs within existing/other program elements.

(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $495

Prototype analysis of surveillance ATC/R demonstration.

  • (U) $895

Conducted Operational Concept Demonstration with participation in CINC experiments.

  • (U) $2604

Continued requirements definition and analysis of sensor prototypes and Attack Operations improvements

  • (U) $3013

Conducted definition studies and analysis on Airborne Laser

  • (U) $4885

F-15E ATC/R demonstration.

  • (U) $11,892

Total

(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $1190

Conduct demonstration of surveillance ATR prototype.

  • (U) $3367

Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration.

  • (U) $1528

Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system upgrades, improved model fidelity and threat scenarios.

  • (U) $2640

Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype.

  • (U) $8,725

Total

(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $2468

Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration.

  • (U) $1650

Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, incorporate model and threat scenario upgrades and perform engagement analyses for input to future year mission analysis.

  • (U) $3902

Conduct development of F-15E ATC/R prototype integrated with improved on/off-board sensor fusion.

  • (U) $8,020

Total

(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):

  • (U) $2458

Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration.

  • (U) $1755

Continue analysis of updated architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, incorporate obscured targets and weapon effects and perform engagement analyses for input to future year mission analysis.

  • (U) $3881

Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype with sensor fusion.

  • (U) $8,094

Total

(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)

 

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

Total

Cost

(U) Previous President’s Budget

12171

8911

18421

18627

TBD

(U) Appropriated Value

12512

8911

   

TBD

(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value

       

a. Congressional General Reductions

-375

-186

     

b. SBIR

         

c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram

       

d. Below Threshold Reprogramming

-17

       

e. Recissions

-228

       

(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB

-10401

-10533

 

(U) Current Budget Submit/98 PB

11892

8725

8020

8094

TBD

(U) Change Summary Explanation:

Funding: Change in FY97 due to payment of Air Force Bills. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E.

Schedule: The deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E from this PE will delay implementation of a datalink capability in air to ground aircraft until the planned integration under the F-15E program (after FY00).

Technical: N/A

 

 

(U) D. Schedule Profile:

 

 

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

                       

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

(U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance)

       

 

X

X

   

X

       

X

(U) Ops Concept Demonstrations

   

X

     

X

     

X

     

X

 

(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)

FY 1996

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

(U) Definition Studies/Analysis Airborne Laser

3013

0

0

0

(U) Joint STARS ATC/R Demonstration/Improvements

495

1190

0

0

(U) Operational Concept Demonstration

895

3367

2468

2458

(U) Sensor Prototypes and Attack Ops Demonstrations/Sims

2604

1528

1650

1755

(U) F-15E ATC/R Demonstrations

4885

2640

3902

3881

(U) Total

11,892

8,725

8020

8094

(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)

Performing Organizations:

Contractor or Government Performing Activity

Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle

Award or Obligation Date

Performing Activity EAC

Project Office

EAC

Total

Prior to

FY 1996

 

Budget

FY 1996

 

Budget

FY 1997

 

Budget

FY 1998

 

Budget

FY 1999

 

Budget to Complete

 

Total Program

 

Product Development Organizations

Boeing

 

F3361594C1436

Aug 94

 

HQ/ASC

772

0

0

0

0

781

781

Boeing

F3361585C1765

30 May 86

 

HQ/ASC

890

0

0

0

0

890

890

Geometric

F3361594C1441

Mar 95

 

HQ/ASC

65

0

0

0

0

TBD

TBD

Hughes-FD

F3361594D1420000004

Mar 95

 

HQ/ASC

1234

1565

350

3006

1665

TBD

TBD

Norden

F3361592C1045

Sep 94

 

HQ/ASC

540

0

0

0

0

TBD

TBD

Veda

F3361594D14000006

Feb 95

 

HQ/ASC

200

400

0

0

0

TBD

TBD

Lincoln Lab

AF FM 616

Mar 95

 

HQ/ASC

100

0

0

0

0

100

100

Sverdrup

F3361594C1425

Mar 95

 

HQ/ASC

565

35

0

0

0

TBD

TBD

HSC/AL

AF FM 616

Aug 94

 

HQ/ASC

2470

715

985

0

0

TBD

TBD

Sandia Nat Labs

MIPR

Mar 95

 

HQ/ASC

8586

0

240

0

0

TBD

TBD

Lockheed Martin

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

2422

1825

746

1521

TBD

TBD

Optimetrics

TBD

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

0

0

150

TBD

TBD

ESC//JTF

MIPR

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

600

0

0

TBD

TBD

Grumman

AF FM 616

Sep 96

 

HQ/ASC

0

500

350

0

0

850

850

ACC/XPSAS

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

0

500

505

TBD

TBD

WL/AAZ

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ ASC

0

85

96

0

0

TBD

TBD

WL/AAR

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

0

650

675

TBD

TBD

AL/CFHI

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

0

800

745

TBD

TBD

WL/AAJT

AF FM 616

TBD

 

HQ/ASC

0

0

0

0

112

TBD

TBD

Support and Management Organizations

FFRDC

     

HQ/ASC

757

82

648

210

230

TBD

TBD

Non-FFRDC

     

HQ/ASC

471

0

355

160

192

TBD

TBD

HQ ASC

       

561

4943

960

948

559

TBD

TBD

Test and Evaluation Organizations

28 Test/TOT

AF FM 616

Mar 95

 

HQ/ACC

16

910

1316

950

1040

TBD

TBD

AFSAA

AF FM 616

Feb 95

 

HQ/ACC

350

85

0

0

0

TBD

TBD

Eglin-46 Tst Wg

 

May 94

 

HQ/ASC

5296

150

1000

50

700

TBD

TBD

                       

Total Project

       

22874

11892

8725

8020

8094

TBD

TBD