|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Total Program Element (PE) Cost |
|||||||||||
|
Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
Air Force Theater Missile Defense (TMD) is focused in three areas: Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) enhancements; Improvements to existing Attack Operations systems; and the development of the Airborne Laser. PE028060F is primarily concerned with C4I and Attack Operations as part of the Air Force focus in TMD, but also addresses some initial BMC4I studies and analysis for the Airborne Laser (ABL) technology program. AF TMD concentrates on defining improvements to existing operational capabilities, developing and evaluating prototypes, demonstrating as well as simulating modifications during operational concept demonstrations, and coordinating the transition of these capabilities to operational systems. C4I improvements contribute greatly to the overall effectiveness of TMD systems developed by each of the Services and the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (Patriot, THAAD, etc.). C4I enhancements improve our ability to assess, target, plan and task attackers to counter Theater Missile (TM) threats. The C4I program encompasses JTIDS TMD Upgrades (including, for example, TMD Message Set Integration and JTIDS Range Extension), Distributed Battle Management, Operations Decision Tools (Time Critical Target Aid (TCTA), Defensive Planning Module (DPM), and Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA)), Intel Support Systems (Intel Support Concept and Real Time Intel Tools) and integration of these systems within the Air Force and among the Services. Attack Operations focuses on improving the ability to locate, identify, target and destroy theater missiles and supporting infrastructure, including theater missile threats in production, deployment, prior to and during launch, as well as soon after launch before critical mobile targets are able to egress to hide locations. The foundation for Attack Operations is improved C4I and automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) upgrades to one or more airborne platforms (Joint STARS, F-15E, Rivet Joint, U-2). The Air Force program is based upon taking our defense against the growing theater missile threat to the enemy by making near-term modifications to existing theater assets. The TMD program seeks to improve existing operational capability, evaluate and demonstrate prototypes, as well as simulate and demonstrate modifications during operational concept demonstrations.
(U) Acquisition Strategy: HQ ASC provides the program management for the concept exploration of TMD Attack Operations. ASC conducts lab demonstrations with Wright Labs and support Concept of Operations (CONOPS) development and requirements definition by analyzing and demonstrating measures of effectiveness for various sensor improvements and cueing schemes. HQ ESC provides program management for the concept exploration of C4I enhancements. Prototypes and analysis of improvements to existing C4I assets will complement the Attack Operations effort with combined participation in Operational Concept Demonstrations. These Attack Operations and C4I analyses and demonstrations are specifically targeted against operational deficiencies identified in the TMD Mission Area Plan (MAP), are traceable to the AF and JROC Mission Need Statement (MNS) and are consistent with the Air Force and Joint TMD CONOPS and in accordance with Joint Doctrine. Integration of TMD requirements and fielding of proposed material solutions will continue beyond concept exploration in the appropriate program element for a particular system. For example, the TMD demonstration and requirements analysis for F-15E ATC/R may transition into a F-15E Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) and P3I project within the F-15E program element. Existing contracts will be used for those systems where engineering change proposals are appropriate. Systems Engineering and Technical Analysis (SETA) contracts will be used to support the requirements definition phase of TMD improvements. In those areas where new material solutions are necessary to correct a deficiency, the source selection process will be followed to establish a new contract.
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) Previous President’s Budget |
24230 |
22285 |
45134 |
45713 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
25102 |
31285 |
TBD |
||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|
||||
a. Congressional General Reductions |
-679 |
-700 |
|||
b. Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) |
|||||
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram |
|||||
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming |
-17 |
||||
e. Rescissions |
-347 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
+9000 |
-15952 |
-14031 |
||
|
(U) Current Budget Submit/FY 1997 President’s Budget |
24059 |
30585 |
29182 |
31682 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY97 plus-up for UH-1N Simulator integration into the TACCSF simulation environment. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E, deletion of the Active Defense Decision Aid (ADDA), and deletion of an early airborne prototype for Distributed Battle Management (DBM). These programs were deleted to fund higher priority AF programs.
Technical: N/A
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A
(U) D. Schedule Profile
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
(U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance) |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||||
|
(U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototypes/Contingency Support Systems |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
(U) TACCSF |
X |
X |
||||||||||||||
|
(U) Intel Support Systems: ISC updates; Syria, Iran, and Iraq, and automation of country studies |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
|
(U) TMD TACS systems requirements (JTIDS message upgrades, decision aids & planning tools) |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|||||||||||
|
(U) Ops Concept Demonstrations |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence Enhancements |
12,167 |
21,860 |
21,162 |
23,588 |
21,749 |
24,150 |
17,838 |
14,026 |
TBD |
Continuing |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
C4I enhancements are needed to reduce the battle management and command & control timelines associated with the theater missile threat. The C4I program includes:
1) Operations and maintenance of the Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF);
2) Procurement of four MCE/TPS-75 prototypes with expert missile tracker (EMT) and correlator capability;
3) Intel Support Systems which include the development and revision of the Intel Support Concept (ISC), digitization of the country studies and development of processes and tools for automated application of TMD Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace (IPB);
4) JTIDS TMD upgrades which are the development and integration of TMD messages into JTIDS host platforms and the extension of JTIDS beyond line of sight;
5) Operations Decision Support Tools which include the integration of the Time Critical Target Aid into TBM Core Systems (TBMCS) architecture, the development and migration of the Defensive Planning Module into TBMCS, and initiating the development of the Attack Operations Decision Aid.
6) Distributed Battle Management concept, which enhances the forward execution capabilities of the TACS to counter the short timeline of time critical targets. This includes the development, integration and test of the DBM capability on an airborne platform. The program will leverage off the capabilities of the current ground Combat Integration Capability (CIC) program which integrates and fuses various intelligence and surveillance feeds to provide the Joint Force Commander (JFC)/Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) with an effective battle management capability.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continued support for Theater Air Command and Control Simulation Facility (TACCSF) operations for C4I simulation and analysis |
|
Continued missile tracker prototype acquisition for MCE/TPS-75 |
|
Intel Support Systems--Developed processes and tools for automatic production of digitized TMD Intel Prep of the Battlefield (IPB) information. |
|
TMD JTIDS message integration into CRC, Rivet Joint, and Cobra Ball; JTIDS Range Extension concept implementation; Development of TCTA and Defensive Planning Module (DPM) and began design for Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS) integration; started Distributed Battle Management (DBM) analysis and design. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete TACCSF operations support for C4I simulation and analysis; begin incorporation of simulator link to UH-1N SOF simulator. |
|
Complete MCE/TPS-75 missile tracker and correlator capability with final delivery. |
|
Intel Support Systems - Update Intelligence Support Concept (ISC); Complete development of tool for automatic application of digitized TMD IPB information and transition into Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS). |
|
JTIDS TMD message integration into JSTARS, ABCCC and AOC; Complete JTIDS Range Extension performance and cost analysis; Continue development of TCTA (DIS compatible) and DPM V1.0 and transition to TBMCS; Complete DBM trade and analysis/platform impacts and CONOPS validation; Investigate procedures and advanced technology for Attack Operations Decision Aid (AODA). |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Integrate IPB Tool and release with TBMCS; Adapt IPB tool for Air Intelligence Agency’s Virtual Production environment; Demonstrate automated procedures and system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations, CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. |
|
Continue to integrate JTIDS TMD message sets into JTIDS host platforms; Begin JTIDS Range Extension implementation; Establish Airborne DBM development environment and DBM unique prototyping/technology development. |
|
Integrate DPM V2.0 and TCTA (ground targeting) and release with TBMCS; Begin AODA prototype/technology development. Explore use of promising planning tools, C2 decision aids, communication and computer processing improvements, sensor fusion technology and sensor upgrade impacts to BMC4I Theater Missile Defense connectivity. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue to adapt the IPB tool for Air Intelligence Agency’s Virtual Production environment; Demonstrate improved automated procedures and IPB system capabilities in Ops Concept Demonstrations (OCDs), CINC experiments and Joint Exercises. |
|
JTIDS/Link-16 Integration: Complete integration of JTIDS/Link-16 TMD message sets onto major C2 nodes; Continue JTIDS Range Extension implementation. |
|
Operations Decision Support Tools - Upgrade DPM (deployment planner), continue to explore BMC4I/sensor improvements that compress Theater Missile engagement timelines and demonstrate integrated capabilities in OCDs, CINC experiments, and Joint Exercises. Begin DBM platform upgrades: battle management, target nomination and communication improvements; Complete AODA prototype/technology development and design for CIC integration. |
|
Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) Previous President’s Budget |
12059 |
13374 |
26713 |
27086 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
12590 |
13374 |
TBD |
||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|
|
|||
a. Congressional General Reductions |
-304 |
-514 |
|||
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram |
|
||||
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming |
|||||
e. Rescissions |
-119 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
+9000 |
-5551 |
-3498 |
||
|
(U) Current Budget Submit/98 PB |
12167 |
21860 |
21162 |
23588 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: FY97 plus-up for integration of UH-1N Simulator into the TACCSF simulation environment. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Active Defense Decision Aid (ADDA), and deletion of an early airborne prototype for Distributed Battle Management (DBM). These programs were deleted to fund higher priority AF programs.
Schedule: An airborne Distributed Battle Management prototype will be delayed until FY00/01, when DBM is integrated into Theater Battle Management Core Systems (TBMCS).
Technical: N/A
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands): N/A
(U) D. Schedule Profile: See page 3.
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|||||||||||||
|
(U) TPS-75 Expert Missile Tracker Prototypes/Contingency Support Systems |
X |
X |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(U)TACCSF |
X |
X |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (U) Intel Support Systems: ISC updates; Syria, Iran, and Iraq, and automation of country studies |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(U) TMD TACS systems requirements (JTIDS message upgrades, decision aids & planning tools) |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($0 in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|
|
(U) TACCSF |
5100 |
14900 |
0 |
0 |
|
(U) Intelligence Support Systems (ISC/Automated IPB) |
650 |
1300 |
2717 |
4350 |
|
(U) MCE/TPS-75 Missile Tracking System |
3709 |
3000 |
0 |
0 |
|
(U) JTIDS/Link-16 Integration & Beyond LOS Capability |
1000 |
520 |
8645 |
8860 |
|
(U) Distributed Battle Management (DBM) |
1100 |
300 |
2400 |
6378 |
|
(U) Operations Decision Support Tools (planning tools, decision aids, C4I processing and sensor fusion technologies) |
608 |
1840 |
7400 |
4000 |
|
(U) Total |
12,167 |
21,860 |
21,162 |
23,588 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($0 in Thousands)
Performing Organizations:
|
Contractor or Government Performing Activity |
Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total Prior to FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget FY 1998 |
Budget FY 1999 |
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
|
Product Development Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
Martin Marietta (TACCSF) |
FFP |
Oct 95 |
ACCDRA |
9100 |
4700 |
14900 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
28,700 |
|
|
North/Grumman (TPS-75) |
FFP |
Oct 95 |
ESC/AVT |
2069 |
2142 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
4,211 |
||
|
Zeltech/SPARTAPSR/BETAC (IPB) |
T&M |
May 96 |
ACC/INX |
500 |
837 |
830 |
2294 |
3693 |
TBD |
8,154 |
|
|
Logicon (DBM) |
T&M |
May 96 |
ESC/XRS |
1131 |
0 |
2038 |
5397 |
TBD |
8,566 |
||
|
Alphatech (DPM) |
T&M |
Mar 95 |
ESC/XRS |
500 |
840 |
3736 |
849 |
TBD |
5,925 |
||
|
Motorola (TCTA) |
T&M |
Mar 96 |
ESC/XRS |
500 |
885 |
849 |
0 |
TBD |
2,234 |
||
|
North/Grm (MSI) AODA-For Profit Contractor |
T&M TBD |
Nov 96 Oct 97 |
ESC/JSX ESC/XRS |
0 0 |
0 0 |
170 |
1189 1698 |
425 2547 |
TBD TBD |
1,784 |
|
|
Lock/Mart (MSI) |
T&M |
Mar 97 |
ESC/XRS |
50 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
50 |
|||
|
MASC
JRE-For Profit Contractor |
TBD TBD |
Nov 96 Oct 97 |
ESC/XRS ESC/XRS |
0 0 |
0 0 |
200 0 |
0 6151 |
0 7098 |
TBD TBD |
200 |
|
|
Support and Management Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
FFRDC |
1605 |
1395 |
975 |
1784 |
1992 |
TBD |
7,751 |
||||
|
Non-FFRDC |
1935 |
1035 |
534 |
892 |
996 |
TBD |
5,392 |
||||
|
HQ ESC |
2251 |
0 |
334 |
531 |
591 |
TBD |
3,707 |
||||
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
TBD |
|
||||||||||
|
Total Project |
15391 |
12167 |
21860 |
21162 |
23588 |
TBD |
TBD |
||||
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Attack Operations Concept Development |
11,892 |
8,725 |
8,020 |
8,094 |
8,581 |
9,169 |
10,463 |
10,951 |
TBD |
Continuing |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
Improvements in Attack Operations are based on the ability to locate, identify, and destroy theater missiles, their launchers, and associated infrastructure on the ground. In addition to the enhancements to C4I, the Attack Operations Project focuses on advanced sensor and target identification capabilities, CONOPS and requirements development for TMD offensive counter-air and their optimized integration with defensive systems. Specific technologies such as automatic target cueing/recognition (ATC/R) and moving target indicator/track (MTI/T) upgrades to Joint STARS, F-15E and potentially the U-2, F-16 and UAVs are to be analyzed using constructive analysis and evaluated through Technology/Operational Concept Demonstrations and CINC Experiments along with command and control connectivity upgrades critical to their optimum employment against time-critical targets. Effectiveness and affordability parameters defined will be used in support of follow on acquisition decisions involving P3I upgrades to existing weapon systems and potential new start programs within existing/other program elements.
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Prototype analysis of surveillance ATC/R demonstration. |
|
Conducted Operational Concept Demonstration with participation in CINC experiments. |
|
Continued requirements definition and analysis of sensor prototypes and Attack Operations improvements |
|
Conducted definition studies and analysis on Airborne Laser |
|
F-15E ATC/R demonstration. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Conduct demonstration of surveillance ATR prototype. |
|
Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. |
|
Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system upgrades, improved model fidelity and threat scenarios. |
|
Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. |
|
Continue analysis of architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, incorporate model and threat scenario upgrades and perform engagement analyses for input to future year mission analysis. |
|
Conduct development of F-15E ATC/R prototype integrated with improved on/off-board sensor fusion. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Conduct Attack Operations Operational Concept Demonstration. |
|
Continue analysis of updated architectures with weapon system and BMC4I upgrades, incorporate obscured targets and weapon effects and perform engagement analyses for input to future year mission analysis. |
|
Conduct demonstration of F-15E ATC/R prototype with sensor fusion. |
|
Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) Previous President’s Budget |
12171 |
8911 |
18421 |
18627 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
12512 |
8911 |
TBD |
||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|
||||
a. Congressional General Reductions |
-375 |
-186 |
|||
b. SBIR |
|||||
c. Omnibus or Other Above Threshold Reprogram |
|
||||
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming |
-17 |
||||
e. Recissions |
-228 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
|
|
-10401 |
-10533 |
|
|
(U) Current Budget Submit/98 PB |
11892 |
8725 |
8020 |
8094 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: Change in FY97 due to payment of Air Force Bills. Changes in FY98 and FY99 were due to deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E.
Schedule: The deletion of Link-16 integration in the F-15E from this PE will delay implementation of a datalink capability in air to ground aircraft until the planned integration under the F-15E program (after FY00).
Technical: N/A
(U) D. Schedule Profile:
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|||||||||||||
|
(U) ATC/R Demos (F-15E/Surveillance) |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(U) Ops Concept Demonstrations |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|
|
(U) Definition Studies/Analysis Airborne Laser |
3013 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
(U) Joint STARS ATC/R Demonstration/Improvements |
495 |
1190 |
0 |
0 |
|
(U) Operational Concept Demonstration |
895 |
3367 |
2468 |
2458 |
|
(U) Sensor Prototypes and Attack Ops Demonstrations/Sims |
2604 |
1528 |
1650 |
1755 |
|
(U) F-15E ATC/R Demonstrations |
4885 |
2640 |
3902 |
3881 |
|
(U) Total |
11,892 |
8,725 |
8020 |
8094 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Performing Organizations:
|
Contractor or Government Performing Activity |
Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total Prior to FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget FY 1998 |
Budget FY 1999 |
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
|
Product Development Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
Boeing
|
F3361594C1436 |
Aug 94 |
HQ/ASC |
772 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
781 |
781 |
|
|
Boeing |
F3361585C1765 |
30 May 86 |
HQ/ASC |
890 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
890 |
890 |
|
|
Geometric |
F3361594C1441 |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ASC |
65 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Hughes-FD |
F3361594D1420000004 |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ASC |
1234 |
1565 |
350 |
3006 |
1665 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Norden |
F3361592C1045 |
Sep 94 |
HQ/ASC |
540 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
| Veda |
F3361594D14000006 |
Feb 95 |
HQ/ASC |
200 |
400 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Lincoln Lab |
AF FM 616 |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ASC |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
Sverdrup |
F3361594C1425 |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ASC |
565 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
HSC/AL |
AF FM 616 |
Aug 94 |
HQ/ASC |
2470 |
715 |
985 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Sandia Nat Labs |
MIPR |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ASC |
8586 |
0 |
240 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Lockheed Martin |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
2422 |
1825 |
746 |
1521 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Optimetrics |
TBD |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
ESC//JTF |
MIPR |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
600 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Grumman |
AF FM 616 |
Sep 96 |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
500 |
350 |
0 |
0 |
850 |
850 |
|
|
ACC/XPSAS |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
505 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
WL/AAZ |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ ASC |
0 |
85 |
96 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
WL/AAR |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
650 |
675 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
AL/CFHI |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
800 |
745 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
WL/AAJT |
AF FM 616 |
TBD |
HQ/ASC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
112 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Support and Management Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
FFRDC |
HQ/ASC |
757 |
82 |
648 |
210 |
230 |
TBD |
TBD |
|||
|
Non-FFRDC |
HQ/ASC |
471 |
0 |
355 |
160 |
192 |
TBD |
TBD |
|||
|
HQ ASC |
561 |
4943 |
960 |
948 |
559 |
TBD |
TBD |
||||
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
28 Test/TOT |
AF FM 616 |
Mar 95 |
HQ/ACC |
16 |
910 |
1316 |
950 |
1040 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
AFSAA |
AF FM 616 |
Feb 95 |
HQ/ACC |
350 |
85 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
Eglin-46 Tst Wg |
May 94 |
HQ/ASC |
5296 |
150 |
1000 |
50 |
700 |
TBD |
TBD |
||
|
Total Project |
22874 |
11892 |
8725 |
8020 |
8094 |
TBD |
TBD |
||||