|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Total Program Element (PE) Cost |
|||||||||||
|
Quantity of RDT&E Articles |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
This program is designed to rapidly transition development efforts in the science and technology base directly to warfighting commands. Projects are directly responsive to operational requirements for improved battle management, communications, theater missile defense (TMD), and surveillance capability. Takes advantage of advanced technology developments throughout the services and industry as well as off-the-shelf technology. The program also defines system architectures and develops communications technology for modernization and improving the Air Force portion of the Tri-Service communications networks which the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) oversees. This research is in Category 4, Demonstration and Validation, because its products are primarily advanced development models, rapid prototype efforts, and software developed through evolutionary acquisition methods.
(U) Acquisition Strategy:
All major contracts within this Program Element were awarded after full open competition. (When restricted technologies are involved, foreign competition is not allowed.) Most contracts are of the cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) type, but when it is deemed appropriate by procurement officials, award fee contracts or firm-fixed price contracts are utilized.
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) FY 1997 President’s Budget |
6,437 |
4,378 |
7,941 |
8,164 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
6,437 |
4,378 |
|||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|||||
a. Congressional Reductions |
-161 |
-114 |
|||
b. Small Business Innovative Research |
-110 |
-85 |
|||
c. Omnibus/Other Above Threshold Reprogramming |
-124 |
||||
|
d. Below Threshold Reprogramming |
-1 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
-291 |
-238 |
|||
|
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget |
6,041 |
4,179 |
7,650 |
7,926 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: See individual projects.
Schedule: N/A
Technical: See individual projects.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands) - See individual projects.
(U) D. Schedule Profile - See individual projects.
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Tactical Air Surveillance |
1,003 |
1,014 |
803 |
457 |
469 |
474 |
480 |
489 |
Continuing |
TBD |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
Develops advanced technology and demonstrates equipment improvements to the Theater Air Control System (TACS) ground surveillance radars. Investigates non-radar and/or adjunct radar sensors to address the Combat Air Forces (CAF) surveillance, detection, and tracking requirements not satisfied by an active radar. Develops advanced surveillance technology in support of next generation sensors and sensor signal processing.(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue development of tube based transmitter panel for AN/TPS-75. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete tube based transmitter panel for AN/TPS-75. |
|
Initiate and complete tube based transmitter panel performance evaluation. |
|
Initiate and complete analysis of solid state versus tube based transmitter for AN/TPS-75 Radar Set |
|
Initiate waveform and signal processor design and evaluation. |
|
Initiate development of Radar Siting Tool for Tactical Surveillance Radar |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Initiate Track Before Detect for Theater Missile Defense (TMD) with adaptive elevation angle estimation |
|
Initiate Mode S integration study for AN/TPS-75 Radar Set |
|
Complete development of Radar Siting Tool for Tactical Surveillance Radar |
|
Complete waveform and signal processor design and evaluation |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue Track Before Detect for TMD |
|
Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) FY 1997 President’s Budget |
998 |
1,057 |
810 |
461 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
1,039 |
1,057 |
|||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|||||
a. Congressional Reductions |
-20 |
-22 |
|||
b. Small Business Innovative Research |
-21 |
||||
c. Omnibus/Other Above Threshold Reprogramming |
-16 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
-7 |
-4 |
|||
|
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget |
1,003 |
1,014 |
803 |
457 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: N/A
Schedule: N/A
Technical: Radar Siting Tool, Mode S, and Track Before Detect for TMD developments added as next highest priority activities planned.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands):
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To Compl |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0602204F, Project 2002) |
8,682 |
8,784 |
10,046 |
9,529 |
9,314 |
10,863 |
10,344 |
10,598 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0603789F, Project 4072) |
6,777 |
6,124 |
6,841 |
6,941 |
7,146 |
7,917 |
7,846 |
8,051 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0207412) |
535 |
590 |
393 |
440 |
487 |
471 |
460 |
451 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) Other Procurement, AF (0207412) |
17,633 |
9,947 |
28,178 |
26,516 |
24,973 |
19,860 |
20,845 |
20,925 |
Cont |
TBD |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
(U) Tube-based transmitter development |
X |
|||||||||||||||
(U) Tube-based transmitter panel performance and R&M testing |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Tube-based versus solid-state eval |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Develop waveform signal processor |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Radar Siting Tool for Tactical Surveillance Radar |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Integrate Mode S into AN/TPS-75 |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Track Before Detect for TMD |
* |
|||||||||||||||
* Indicates the start of an activity; X indicates the completion.
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|
|
(U) Primary Hardware Development |
815 |
899 |
685 |
338 |
|
(U) Government Engineering Support |
168 |
100 |
103 |
104 |
|
(U) Travel |
20 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
|
(U) Total |
1,003 |
1,014 |
803 |
457 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Performing Organizations:
|
Contractor or Government Performing Activity |
Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total Prior to FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget FY 1998 |
Budget FY 1999 |
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
|
|
Product Development Organizations |
||||||||||||
|
Hughes |
C/CPFF |
June 95 |
n/a |
n/a |
345 |
834 |
204 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,383 |
|
|
TBD |
TOA |
Apr 97 |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
470 |
435 |
0 |
0 |
905 |
|
|
Support and Management Organizations |
||||||||||||
|
Rome Laboratory |
In-house |
N/A |
n/a |
n/a |
Cont. |
169 |
190 |
243 |
207 |
Continuing |
TBD |
|
|
Miscellaneous |
Various |
Various |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
150 |
125 |
250 |
Continuing |
TBD |
|
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable. |
||||||||||||
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)
Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable.
|
Subtotal Product Development |
345 |
834 |
674 |
435 |
0 |
0 |
2,288 |
|
Subtotal Support and Management |
Cont. |
169 |
340 |
368 |
457 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Subtotal Test and Evaluation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Total Project |
Cont. |
1,003 |
1,014 |
803 |
457 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Tactical Air Information Production & Distribution |
1,383 |
530 |
2,808 |
3,142 |
3,233 |
3,275 |
3,341 |
3,418 |
Continuing |
TBD |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue Secure Survivable Communications Network (SSCN) Phase II. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete SSCN Phase II/Conduct Joint Demonstration. |
|
Initiate Plan for Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio development. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Initiate Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio ruggedization. |
|
Initiate Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio antenna development. |
|
Initiate Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio electro-magnetic interference/compatability tests. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio ruggedization. |
|
Complete Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio antenna development. |
|
Complete Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio electro-magnetic interference/compatability tests. |
|
Complete Speakeasy airborne-transportable radio control development. |
|
Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) FY 1997 President’s Budget |
1,383 |
569 |
2,844 |
3,188 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
1,581 |
569 |
|||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|||||
a. Congressional Reductions |
-56 |
-28 |
|||
b. Small Business Innovative Research |
-110 |
-11 |
|||
c. Omnibus/Other Above Threshold Reprogramming |
-32 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
-36 |
-46 |
|||
|
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget |
1,383 |
530 |
2,808 |
3,142 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: N/A
Schedule: N/A
Technical: N/A
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands):
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To Compl |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0602702F, Project 4519) |
11,886 |
12,300 |
11,550 |
12,964 |
10,886 |
12,514 |
12,009 |
12,360 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0603789F, Project 2335) |
5,055 |
4,265 |
4,636 |
4,119 |
4,269 |
5,414 |
5,363 |
5,511 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0603238F, Project 4216) |
2,367 |
2,191 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0603789F, Project 4216) |
0 |
0 |
1,420 |
2,441 |
2,564 |
2,768 |
2,834 |
2,919 |
Cont |
TBD |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
(U) Secure Survivable Comm Net Phase II |
||||||||||||||||
|
- Transition Plan |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
|
- Development |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- Joint Demonstration |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
|
(U) Speakeasy Radio System Development |
||||||||||||||||
- Ruggedization |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
- Antenna Development |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
- Electro-magnetic Interference and Compatability Tests |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
- Control Development |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
* Indicates the start of an activity; X indicates the completion.
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|
|
(U) Primary Hardware Development |
1,053 |
190 |
2,618 |
3,042 |
|
(U) Government Engineering Support |
60 |
50 |
60 |
60 |
|
(U) Travel |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
|
(U) Contractor Engineering Support |
230 |
250 |
90 |
0 |
|
(U) Total |
1,383 |
530 |
2,808 |
3,142 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Performing Organizations:
|
Contractor or Government Performing Activity |
Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total Prior to FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget FY 1998 |
Budget FY 1999 |
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
|
Product Development Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
ESC |
PD |
Various |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
210 |
230 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
440 |
|
SOCOM |
PD |
Sept 96 |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
392 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
392 |
|
TBD (Speakeasy) |
TBD |
TBD |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2,508 |
2,842 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Support and Management Organizations |
|||||||||||
|
Rome Laboratory |
In-house |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Cont. |
392 |
139 |
300 |
300 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Miscellaneous |
Various |
Various |
n/a |
n/a |
Cont. |
389 |
161 |
0 |
0 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable |
|||||||||||
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)
Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
|
Subtotal Product Development |
0 |
602 |
230 |
2,508 |
2,842 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Subtotal Support and Management |
Cont. |
781 |
300 |
300 |
300 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Subtotal Test and Evaluation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
Total Project |
Cont |
1,383 |
530 |
2,808 |
3,142 |
Cont. |
TBD |
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Tactical Battle Information Management |
3,394 |
2,385 |
3,894 |
4,118 |
4,237 |
4,295 |
4,369 |
4,469 |
Continuing |
TBD |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
Designs and integrates improvements to system software and C3 applications modules via rapid prototyping and maximum user participation in all design activities. Current focus is the functional development and rapid prototyping of the Force Level Execution (FLEX) system, which will assist the combat operations personnel in an AOC to quickly replan or reallocate resources based on real-time threat inputs, including time critical targets (TCTs) and changes in the wartime scenario. The Defensive Planning and Execution system will provide an automated system that aids the air defense duty officers in planning the integrated employment of Defensive Counter-Air and Active and Passive Defenses in conjunction with Offensive Counter-Air, to destroy or neutralize enemy aircraft and theater missiles.(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue FLEX development. |
|
Continue TBM systems integration evaluations. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue FLEX development and initiate integration into TBM Core Systems. |
|
Initiate accelerated Defensive Planning and Execution software development for joint use |
|
Complete TBM systems integration evaluations. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete initial FLEX integration into TBMCS V1.0 and TBMCS remote terminals. |
|
Continue Defensive Planning and Execution software development |
|
Initiate FLEX airborne applications via TBMCS remote terminals (i.e. AWACS, JSTARS, ABCCC). |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Complete FLEX airborne application integration into TBMCS remote terminals. |
|
Initiate itegration of Defensive Planning and Execution as a TBMCS application. |
|
Total |
(U) B. Program Change Summary ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) FY 1997 President’s Budget |
3,394 |
2,485 |
3,926 |
4,156 |
TBD |
|
(U) Appropriated Value |
3,533 |
2,485 |
|||
|
(U) Adjustments to Appropriated Value |
|||||
a. Congressional Reductions |
-69 |
-52 |
|||
b. Small Business Innovative Research |
-48 |
||||
c. Omnibus/Other Above Threshold Reprogramming |
-70 |
||||
|
(U) Adjustments to Budget Years Since FY 1997 PB |
-32 |
-38 |
|||
|
(U) FY 1998/1999 Biennial Budget |
3,394 |
2,385 |
3,894 |
4,118 |
TBD |
(U) Change Summary Explanation:
Funding: N/A
Schedule: N/A
Technical: Defensive Planning and Execution software development added as next highest priority activity planned.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Thousands):
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
FY 2000 |
FY 2001 |
FY 2002 |
FY 2003 |
To Compl |
Total Cost |
|
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0603789F, Project 2335) |
5,055 |
4,265 |
4,636 |
4,119 |
4,269 |
5,414 |
5,363 |
5,511 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
(U) RDT&E, AF (0207438F, Project 4287) |
18,425 |
23,970 |
12,886 |
9,222 |
8,765 |
6,847 |
11,522 |
11,879 |
Cont |
TBD |
(U) D. Schedule Profile
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
(U) TBM Systems Integration Evaluation |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
(U) FLEX |
||||||||||||||||
|
- TBMCS V1.0 integration |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- Airborne application |
* |
X |
||||||||||||||
(U) Defensive Planning and Execution software development |
* |
|||||||||||||||
|
- Evolutionary Prototype (EP) #1 |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- EP #2 |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- EP #3 |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- Advanced Technology Demonstration |
X |
|||||||||||||||
|
- Functional Validation Model #1 |
X |
|||||||||||||||
* Indicates the start of an activity; X indicates the completion.
(U) A. Project Cost Breakdown ($ in Thousands)
|
FY 1996 |
FY 1997 |
FY 1998 |
FY 1999 |
|
|
(U) Software Development |
2,587 |
1760 |
3,039 |
3,418 |
|
(U) Government Engineering Support |
360 |
250 |
430 |
200 |
|
(U) Travel |
79 |
150 |
150 |
200 |
|
(U) Contractor Engineering Support |
368 |
225 |
275 |
300 |
|
(U) Total |
3,394 |
2,385 |
3,894 |
4,118 |
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information ($ in Thousands)
Performing Organizations:
|
Contractor or Government Performing Activity |
Contract Method/Type or Funding Vehicle |
Award or Obligation Date |
Performing Activity EAC |
Project Office EAC |
Total Prior to FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1996 |
Budget FY 1997 |
Budget FY 1998 |
Budget FY 1999 |
Budget to Complete |
Total Program |
||
|
Product Development Organizations |
|||||||||||||
|
Logicon |
C/CPFF |
June 94 |
n/a |
n/a |
3,084 |
2,420 |
818 |
1,775 |
0 |
0 |
8,097 |
||
|
TBD (DPE) |
C/CPAF |
Mar 94 |
n/a |
n/a |
0 |
0 |
650 |
650 |
2,500 |
3,400 |
7,200 |
||
|
Support and Management Organizations |
|||||||||||||
|
Rome Laboratory |
In-house |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
Cont |
779 |
604 |
955 |
1,025 |
Cont |
TBD |
||
|
Miscellaneous |
Various |
Various |
n/a |
n/a |
Cont |
195 |
313 |
514 |
593 |
Cont |
TBD |
||
|
Test and Evaluation Organizations - Not Applicable |
|||||||||||||
(U) B. Budget Acquisition History and Planning Information Continued ($ in Thousands)
Government Furnished Property: Not Applicable
|
Subtotal Product Development |
3,084 |
2,420 |
1,468 |
2,425 |
2,500 |
3,400 |
15,297 |
|
Subtotal Support and Management |
0 |
0 |
917 |
1,469 |
1,618 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
Subtotal Test and Evaluation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
Total Project |
Cont |
3,394 |
2,385 |
3,894 |
4,118 |
Cont |
TBD |
|
COST ($ In Thousands) |
FY 1996 Actual |
FY 1997 Estimate |
FY 1998 Estimate |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Estimate |
FY 2001 Estimate |
FY 2002 Estimate |
FY 2003 Estimate |
Cost to Complete |
Total Cost |
|
|
Tactical Air Forces Systems Integration |
261 |
250 |
145 |
209 |
231 |
235 |
248 |
255 |
Continuing |
TBD |
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification
: Provides systems engineering and integration support to the Combat Air Forces (CAF) or to other development efforts. Project addresses integration and interoperability issues associated with TBM General Officers Steering Group (GOSG) directed efforts, makes recommendations, identifies deficiencies, and establishes requirements for development efforts.(U) FY 1996 ($ in Thousands):
|
Continue support of TBM core systems integration. |
|
Complete analysis of Defensive Planning and expand to Management of Aggregated Sensors. |
|
Continue evaluation of Force Level joint interoperability issues. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1997 ($ in Thousands):
|
Prepare for AOC Defensive Planning Development. |
|
Complete Sensor Management analysis. |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1998 ($ in Thousands):
|
Support and Analyze TBMCS Theater Integration |
|
Evaluate Defensive Planning and Execution Prototype |
|
Total |
(U) FY 1999 ($ in Thousands):
|
Evaluate Defensive Planning advanced technology demonstration prototype |
|
Initiate transition of Defensive Planning and Execution System to TBMCS |
|
Total |