(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The AEGIS Combat System provides immediate and effective capability to counter the current and expected air, surface and sub-surface threats. Changes in the threat capability and advances in technology such as fiber optics, local area networks, and high performance computing require corresponding Weapon System and Combat System changes. This program provides the Combat System engineering and selected weapons development necessary for a continued increase in the capability of the Combat System in AEGIS cruisers and destroyers. In addition to developing and integrating improvements to the AEGIS Weapon System, this program integrates combat capabilities developed in other Navy R&D programs into the AEGIS Combat System. Modifications of AEGIS Weapon System computer programs must be made to integrate these capabilities into the AEGIS Combat System so that battle effectiveness and Combat System performance will be retained against the evolving threat. Selected Weapon and Combat System upgrades will be backfitted into CG 47 Class and DDG 51 Class ships already in the Fleet, providing key warfighting capability while reducing life cycle maintenance costs. The Smart Ship Project will be incorporated into PE 0604307N under Project K2308 starting in FY 1998. This effort will address reducing shipboard manning requirements and the integration of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) equipment. The goal is to reduce life cycle costs for Navy ships.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development of new end-items prior to production approval decision.

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides AEGIS Cruiser and Destroyer Combat System upgrades and integrates new equipments and systems to pace the threat and capture advances in technology such as fiber optics and distributed architecture. Combat Systems are upgraded in baselines. Baseline 2 (CG 52-58) consists of the Vertical Launching System, TOMAHAWK Weapon System, and Anti-Submarine Warfare upgrades. Baseline 3 (CG 59-64) includes the AN/SPY-1B radar and AN/UYQ-21 consoles. Baseline 4 (CG 65-73) integrates the AN/UYK-43/44 computers with superset computer programs developed for the DDG 51. Baseline 4 is the base Combat System for DDG 51-67. Baseline 5 was introduced in FY 1992 ships and includes the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) Command and Control Processor, Tactical Data Information Link 16, Combat Direction Finding, Tactical Data Information Exchange System, AN/SLQ-32(V)3 Active Electronic Counter Countermeasures and AEGIS Extended Range (ER) Missile. Baseline 5 was developed in three steps (phases): Phase I integrated AEGIS ER and supports the missile Initial Operational Capability; Phase II integrated system upgrades including Deceptive Electronic Countermeasures, Track Load Control algorithms, and Track Initiation Processor; Phase III integrated JTIDS and the OJ-663 color display Tactical Graphics Capability into the AEGIS Combat System. Baseline 6 will be developed in two phases. Baseline 6 Phase I is planned for the last ship in FY 1994, and Phase II is planned for the first ship in FY 1997. Baseline 6 upgrades will include embarked helicopters, Fiber Optics as applied to Data Multiplexing System (DMS), implementation of affordability initiatives, the Radar Set Controller Environmental Simulator (RSCES) and Battle Force Tactical Trainer (BFTT), Advanced Display System, Evolved SEASPARROW Missile (ESSM), Identification (ID) upgrades Phase I, Advanced TOMAHAWK Weapon Control System (ATWCS) Phase II, and Fire Control System upgrades. Baseline 7 will also be developed in two phases. Baseline 7 Phase I is planned for the last ship in FY 1998 and Phase II is planned for the last ship in FY 2002. Major Baseline 7 upgrades include: AN/SPY-1D(V) radar upgrade, integration of Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) and Tactical Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) capability (first forward fit implementation), advanced computer architecture, ID upgrades Phase II, Cueing Sensor, STANDARD Missile-2 Block IIIB full integration,

Advanced Integrated Electronic Warfare System (AIEWS) Phase I and II, Light Airborne Multipurpose System (LAMPS) helicopter Mark III Block II, Advanced Tactical Support, Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS), and Mark 50 torpedo with Periscope

Depth Attack. This project also addresses the Technology Ship Characteristic Improvement Panel(TSCIP)program for advanced computing architecture for SC-21, CVX, LX and other future ship classes.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

· (U) ($18,047) Continued to provide for the participation of Navy laboratories and field activities to perform the engineering and scientific services necessary to monitor and direct the baseline efforts.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

· (U) ($1,710) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 638.

3. (U) FY 1998 PLAN:

· (U) ($8,300) Complete Baseline 6 Phase I computer program coding, debugging and testing. Complete rehosting of ACTS computer programs for BFTT, and for C&D and ID related computer programs into COTS-based architecture. Conduct Link Certification. Conduct System Qualification Test (SQT) demonstration test at the CSED Site.

· (U) ($20,900) Conduct Baseline 6 Phase II CDR. Begin computer program coding, debugging and testing.

· (U) ($15,051) Complete system definition/engineering for full integration of SPY-1D(V) into new construction AEGIS Combat System in Baseline 7 Phase I and start system design.

· (U) ($10,965) Conduct Baseline 7 Phase I PDR for integration of upgrades into the AEGIS Combat System. Continue advanced processing EDM-5 development for open systems networked architecture in Baseline 7 Phase I ships.

· (U) ($7,200) Continue to provide the RDT&E share of operations and maintenance of the CSED Site, Program Generation Center, Computer Program Test Site, and Land Based Test Site.

· (U) ($18,426) Continue to provide for the participation of Navy laboratories and field activities to perform the engineering and scientific services necessary to monitor and direct the baseline efforts.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

· (U) ($16,650) Complete Baseline 6 Phase II computer program code, debugging and testing. Start integration of Baseline 6 Phase II upgrades into the AEGIS Combat System at the CSED Site.

· (U) ($15,981) Continue system engineering for full integration of SPY-1D(V) into new construction AEGIS Combat System in Baseline 7 Phase I.

· (U) ($29,500) Conduct Baseline 7 Phase I CDR for integration of upgrades into the AEGIS Combat System. Start computer program coding, debugging, and testing. Continue advanced processing EDM-5 development for open systems networked architecture in Baseline 7 Phase I ships.

· (U) ($2,947) Conduct system definition and start design of an advanced combat system with fully distributed architecture leveraging HIPER-D and other technology efforts.

· (U) ($7,000) Start system definition and engineering development for integration of the Area Air Defense

Coordinator (AADC) capability into AEGIS Ships.

· (U) ($9,800) Continue to provide the RDT&E share of operations and maintenance of the CSED Site, Program

Generation Center, Computer Program Test Site, and Land Based Test Site.

· (U) ($20,830) Continue to provide for the participation of Navy laboratories and field activities necessary to perform the engineering an scientific services necessary to monitor and direct the baseline efforts.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

B. (U) PROGRAM

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 76,291 82,537 74,198 114,874

(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -3,109 -3,515 +6,644 -12,166

(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submit: 73,182 79,022 80,842 102,708

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 1996 (-$3,109): Changes due to transfer of SBIR (-$1,518), and reductions associated with program and other minor pricing adjustments (-$1,591). FY 1997 (-$3,515): Changes due to Congressional undistributed reductions associated with the NWCF - sec. 8120 (-$1,650), General undistributed - sec. 8136 (-$1,650), FFRDC and Non-FFRDC sec. 8037 (-$170), and other minor pricing adjustments (-$45). FY 1998 (+$6,644): Changes due to program restructure associated with Baseline 7, AADC, and Arsenal ship (+$11,000), reductions for NWCF rate adjustments/carryover and other minor pricing changes (-$4,356). FY 1999 (-$12,166): Changes due to program restructure associated with Baseline 7 and AADC as well as other minor pricing adjustments.

(U) Technical: N/A

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0603216C (Theater Ballistic Missile Defense)

(U) PE 0603382N (Advanced Combat System Technology)

(U) PE 0603755N (Ship Self Defense)

(U) PE 0604216C (Theater Ballistic Missile Defense)

(U) PE 0604366N (Standard Missile Improvements)

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: See attachment (1)

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

a. System Engineering 54,068 64,542 65,266 85,482

b. Gov. Engineering Spt. 15,805 11,123 13,880 15,479

c. Pgm. Management Spt. 541 572 589 607

d. Development Test and Eval. 1,250 1,075 1,107 1,140

e. SBIR Assessments 1,518 1,710 0 0

Total 73,182 79,022 80,842 102,708

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Contract

Government Method/ Award/ Perform Project Total

Performing Fund Type Oblig Activity Office FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

Activity Vehicle Date EAC EAC & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Product Development

Martin Marietta, Moorestown, NJ

SS/CPFF 03/93 389,135 389,135 133,489 50,886 62,252 61,016 81,492 CONT. CONT.

Applied Physics Lab (APL), Baltimore, MD

SS/CPFF 02/94 24,118 24,118 8,368 4,500 2,750 4,000 4,500 CONT. CONT.

McClellan AFB, CA

MIPR 01/94 18,664 18,664 16,964 1,700 0 0 0 0 18,664

Navy Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA

WR 10/93 43,396 43,396 14,025 7,420 6,160 7,601 8,190 CONT. CONT.

Vitro Corp., Silver Spring, MD

C/CPFF 10/92 14,661 14,661 9,961 4,700 0 0 0 0 14,661

• 400 B Omnibus Contract

C/CPFF 12,750 12,750 0 0 4,000 4,250 4,500 CONT. CONT.

Miscellaneous 14,159 14,159 5,203 2,185 2,213 2,279 2,279 CONT. CONT.

Support and Management

Miscellaneous 8,379 8,379 6,070 541 572 589 607 CONT. CONT.

Test and Evaluation

Miscellaneous 6,596 6,596 2,024 1,250 1,075 1,107 1,140 CONT. CONT.

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: Not applicable.

Total

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

& Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Subtotal Product Development 188,010 71,391 77,375 79,146 100,961 CONT. CONT.

Subtotal Support and Management 6,070 541 572 589 607 CONT. CONT.

Subtotal Test and Evaluation 2,024 1,250 1,075 1,107 1,140 CONT. CONT.

Total Project 196,104 73,182 79,022 80,842 102,708 CONT. CONT.

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

A.(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides for modifications to the AEGIS Weapon System MK-7 to counter the threat as articulated in ONI System Threat Assessment Report, ONI TA #046-93 dated May 1993 and subsequent updates. The modifications will be introduced into CG 47 Class and DDG 51 Class ships.

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

· (U) ($1,500) Completed ORTS MMI upgrade implementation.

· (U) ($2,668) Began ORTS upgrade for Baselines 3, 4 and 5.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN:

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

· (U) ($100) Continue AN/SPY-1B/D upgrade analysis support. Complete TIP design changes.

· (U) ($1,200) Continue ORTS upgrade for Baselines 3,4 and 5 design, development and engineering.

· (U) ($1,100) Continue AN/SPY-1B/B(V)/D Moving Target Indicator analysis, design, development and engineering for radar enhancement.

· (U) ($1,800) Continue system engineering for AN/SPY-1B/D DECCM upgrades.

· (U) ($3,125) Continue design and engineering for RCSES for AN/SPY-1D(V) radar system.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 4,568 2,204 6,269 7,406

(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: -100 -90 -146 -81

(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUD Submit: 4,468 2,114 6,123 7,325

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 1996 funding decreased by $100K for FY 1996 SBIR transfer and other minor pricing adjustments.

FY 1997 funding decreased by $90K for Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF) carryover and other minor pricing

adjustments. FY 1998 funding decreased by $146K for NWCF carryover and other minor pricing adjustments.

FY 1999 funding decreased by $81K for respread GDIP/NFIP adjustments (inflation and NWCF charges) and other minor pricing adjustments.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not applicable.

D. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

a. Systems Engineering 3,486 1,255 5,274 6,450

b. Government Engineering Support 885 820 845 870

c. Program Management Support 3 3 4 5

d. SBIR Assessment 94 36 0 0

Total 4,468 2,114 6,123 7,325

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONS

Contractor/ Contract

Government Method/ Award/ Perform Project Total

Performing Fund Type Oblig Activity Office FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

Activity Vehicle Date EAC EAC & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Product Development

Martin Marietta, Morriestown, NJ

SS/CPFF 03/91 25,819 25,819 9,318 3,486 1,291 5,274 6,450 CONT. CONT.

Miscellaneous 4,633 4,633 1,213 885 820 845 870 CONT. CONT.

Support and Management

Miscellaneous 1,068 1,068 959 97 3 4 5 CONT. CONT.

Test and Evaluation: Not applicable.

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: Not applicable.

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

Total

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

& Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Subtotal Product Development 10,531 4,371 2,111 6,119 7,320 CONT. CONT.

Subtotal Support and Management 959 97 3 4 5 CONT. CONT.

Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Project 11,490 4,468 2,114 6,123 7,325 CONT. CONT.

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

A.(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Smart Ship Project (SSP) was initiated by a Chief of Naval Operations directive to examine a variety of means to reduce life cycle cost of ships, concentrating on the fact that a major portion of ship's life cycle cost is manpower. The Project is chartered to devise and implement technology and policy changes which will reduce the workload for a ship's crew. Reduced workload may result in reduced manning and therefore reduce ship life cycle costs. The technology being considered replaces human functions rather than just improving efficiency, and its application requires funding. Policy changes are focused on reducing unnecessary or redundant requirements, and do not require funding. Selected technology and policy changes will be tested in an in-service fleet ship, USS YORKTOWN (CG 48). Those changes which prove successful will be considered for implementation in both current in-service ships and future ships to maximize life cycle cost savings across all Navy ship classes. The Project will develop, procure, install, train and support test projects for demonstration in the two test ships. Successful projects will be analyzed and packaged for wider application in the fleet.

1. (U) FY 1996 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Not Applicable.

2. (U) FY 1997 PLAN: Not Applicable.

· (U) ($478) Assess current technology and equipment available through Department of Defense and industry sources which are candidates for reducing shipboard manning requirements and individual crew member workloads. Any manning and workload reductions identified will not affect ship and system readiness and performance, crew safety, nor habitability.

· (U) ($253) Install and check out equipment on board designated ships and conduct at-sea testing.

4. (U) FY 1999 PLAN:

· (U) ($1,635) Continue ship and system design and engineering necessary to adapt candidate technology and equipment to adapt to shipboard environment and to integrate the equipment into existing ship systems.

· (U) ($978) Continue installation and check out of equipment on board designated ships and conduct at-sea testing.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: B. (U) PROGRAM FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

(U) FY 1997 President's Budget: 0 0 0 0

(U) Adjustments from FY 1997 PRESBUDG: 0 0 +969 +5,610

(U) FY 1998/1999 PRESBUDG Submit: 0 0 969 5,610

(U) CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: Smart Ship is an FY 1998 new start in PE 0604307N.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

(U) RELATED RDT&E: Not Applicable.

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not Applicable.

A. (U) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN: ($ in thousands)

Project Cost Categories FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999

a. Systems Engineering 0 0 547 2,190

b. Government Engineering Support 0 0 250 1,460

c. Program Management Support 0 0 86 960

d. Developmental Test and Evaluation 0 0 86 1,000

Total 0 0 969 5,610

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

Contractor/ Contract

Government Method/ Award/ Perform Project Total

Performing Fund Type Oblig Activity Office FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

Activity Vehicle Date EAC EAC & Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Product Development

Contingent Contractors

SS/CPAF 03/98 2,737 2,737 0 0 0 547 2,190 0 2,737

Support and Management

Misc. 2,756 2,756 0 0 0 336 2,420 0 2,756

Test and Evaluation

Misc. 1,154 1,154 0 0 0 86 1,000 68 1,154

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: Not applicable.

B. (U) BUDGET ACQUISITION HISTORY AND PLANNING INFORMATION ($ in thousands)

FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 To Total

& Prior Budget Budget Budget Budget Complete Program

Subtotal Product Development 0 0 0 547 2,190 0 2,737

Subtotal Support and Management 0 0 0 336 2,420 0 2,756

Subtotal Test and Evaluation 0 0 0 86 1,000 68 1,154

Total Project 0 0 0 969 5,610 68 6,647